LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


View Poll Results: Which Do You Use, NetworkManager or Wicd?
NetworkManager: 82 61.65%
Wicd: 22 16.54%
Other: 29 21.80%
Voters: 133. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-02-2018, 10:25 AM   #1
cwizardone
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current with "True Multilib" and KDE4Town.
Posts: 9,086

Rep: Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262Reputation: 7262
Do You Use NetworkManager or Wicd?


This poll is for Slackware users only. Please do not vote if you don't use Slackware. Thank you.

A claim made by a board member in another thread prompted this poll.
So, in Slackware, do you use NetworkManager or Wicd?
If neither, what do you use?
Thank you.

Last edited by cwizardone; 07-02-2018 at 10:44 AM.
 
Old 07-02-2018, 10:39 AM   #2
Gordie
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: Nolalu, Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Slackware64-Current
Posts: 871

Rep: Reputation: 364Reputation: 364Reputation: 364Reputation: 364
I have used NetworkManager in the past but now am using Wicd. This is on my laptop and I have had problems with wifi at some hotels so I tried this and tried that and in the process have found that I like Wicd and am comfortable using it. My desktop also has Wicd but it is wired so it matters not what I use
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-02-2018, 10:46 AM   #3
GazL
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 6,897

Rep: Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018
I use raw wpa_supplicant and dhcpcd (in master mode) via this custom rc.inet1:
Code:
#!/bin/sh

case "${1:-start}" in
        start)  ip -batch - <<-EOF
                        address flush dev lo
                        address add 127.0.0.1 dev lo
                        link set lo up
                EOF

                if [ ! -e /var/run/wpa_supplicant/wlan0 ]; then
                        iw reg set GB
                        wpa_supplicant -B -c /etc/wpa_supplicant/wlan0.conf -i wlan0 >/dev/null
                fi
                dhcpcd -q -b -L -M wlan0
                ;;
        stop)   dhcpcd -q -k
                ip link set wlan0 down
                if [ -e /var/run/wpa_supplicant/wlan0 ]; then 
                        wpa_cli -i wlan0 terminate >/dev/null
                fi
                ;;
esac
 
3 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-02-2018, 11:10 AM   #4
coralfang
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Bristol, UK
Distribution: Slackware, FreeBSD
Posts: 836
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 297Reputation: 297Reputation: 297
With my current network card, and router, i have been using NetworkManager for quite a while now without any problems. I've also stuck to using NetworkManager for it's additional features provided by the NetworkManager-openvpn slackbuild, which makes it effortless to switch my location for privacy.

Before i got a hold of a "Qualcomm Atheros AR93xx" wifi card, i was having many problems with a Belkin dongle which used the "rt2800usb" driver, where i would get constant unexplainable disconnects, unless i were to use wicd.

So for me, it depends on the device in question. I've found some dongles/cards play better with wicd / vice versa.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-02-2018, 11:57 AM   #5
Richard Cranium
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Location: McKinney, Texas
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0
Posts: 3,858

Rep: Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225Reputation: 2225
Laptops use NetworkManager.

Desktops use rc.inet1.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-02-2018, 02:38 PM   #6
Trasa
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 63

Rep: Reputation: 26
I use rc.inet1. Iirc i have actually done it with /sbin/ip when i had a manjaro version installed that didnt want to connect.

I mean seriously, what could be simpler than opening one file in vi, plugging in your numbers, chmod +x, and it just works.

Of course my network is pretty simple, two desktops and a router, no wifi, so i guess im lucky in the network management dept.

I should add that at one point i tried using Network Mgr. and it was such a mess that i guess it put me off it for ever.

Last edited by Trasa; 07-02-2018 at 02:43 PM.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-02-2018, 03:55 PM   #7
kjhambrick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, TX
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0 + Multilib
Posts: 2,159

Rep: Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512Reputation: 1512
I use wicd on my laptops but hardwire my servers.
 
Old 07-02-2018, 03:58 PM   #8
rkfb
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Guildford, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0 running i3
Posts: 494

Rep: Reputation: 174Reputation: 174
I've never been too sure how I would use NetworkManager in TWM but then neither have I looked into it. Netconfig suggests adding the applet to the desktop, I run dropbox in stalonetray so maybe I could somehow.

Anyway, wicd offers me wicd-curses which is easy, so I just use that.
 
Old 07-02-2018, 04:01 PM   #9
rkfb
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Guildford, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0 running i3
Posts: 494

Rep: Reputation: 174Reputation: 174
So I just randomly typed nm-applet in xterm, hit enter and it popped up in stalonetray, so there you go.
 
Old 07-02-2018, 04:25 PM   #10
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 13,923
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158
Member response

Hi,

I find no need for either. I perform my needs from the cli. I use scripts to control my LAN needs.

Slackware64 does have the scripts to use for my needs and I compose my own scripts to use '/etc/rc.d/rc.inet1' via the '/etc/rc.d/rc.inet1.conf' files.

Hope this helps.
Have fun & enjoy!
 
Old 07-02-2018, 04:33 PM   #11
Poprocks
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 522

Rep: Reputation: 279Reputation: 279Reputation: 279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Cranium View Post
Laptops use NetworkManager.

Desktops use rc.inet1.
This, ditto servers re: rc.inet1.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-02-2018, 05:17 PM   #12
phalange
Member
 
Registered: May 2018
Distribution: Slackware, FreeBSD, Debian
Posts: 355

Rep: Reputation: 184Reputation: 184
I use NM and the other tools in the suite like the applet and the openvpn plugin. I started using Slackware long after working in other distros, so part of it was being already familiar.

Also I use nmcli and nmtui sometimes if I'm not in a GUI or lack a tray for the applet.

Last edited by phalange; 07-02-2018 at 05:19 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 07-02-2018, 05:31 PM   #13
ChuangTzu
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2015
Location: Where ever needed
Distribution: Slackware/Salix while testing others
Posts: 1,718

Rep: Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857Reputation: 1857
Desktop: dhcpcd
Laptop: Wicd

chose Wicd for poll
 
Old 07-02-2018, 06:45 PM   #14
glorsplitz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Distribution: slackware!
Posts: 1,308

Rep: Reputation: 368Reputation: 368Reputation: 368Reputation: 368
wired rc.inet1.conf, wireless wpa_supplicant.conf
 
Old 07-02-2018, 07:05 PM   #15
1337_powerslacker
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Kansas, USA
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0
Posts: 862
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 592Reputation: 592Reputation: 592Reputation: 592Reputation: 592Reputation: 592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Cranium View Post
Laptops use NetworkManager.

Desktops use rc.inet1.
Laptops must use NetworkManager (or wicd)
Desktops can use rc.inet1 as a 3rd option to the above.

I say this because my desktop uses NetworkManager with no difficulty, although I do know how to configure rc.inet1 to use DHCP (or a static address), should the need arise (and has several times in the past).
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Switching from NetworkManager to wicd statguy Slackware 16 02-15-2017 06:42 PM
[SOLVED] wicd connected where networkmanager could not slac-in-the-box Slackware - Installation 4 07-24-2016 03:06 PM
[SOLVED] NetworkManager not working (WICD does) n4rf Slackware 13 09-19-2015 04:48 AM
wicd vs. networkmanager JWJones Slackware 77 09-17-2013 07:16 AM
What is the advantage (if any) of NetworkManager over wicd? BobNutfield Slackware 28 07-13-2012 06:24 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration