Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
07-01-2006, 03:11 PM
|
#16
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,519
Rep:
|
Is there anyway to open konqueror in fluxbox but.. make the konqueror not load up all the other KDE stuff in the background?
I noticed the konqueror (which I was launching from flux in terminal) launches ARTS, and some other stuff too.
I've noticed this actually if I launch any KDE application, like kwrite or kedit even, it wants arts...yuk.
|
|
|
07-01-2006, 03:24 PM
|
#17
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,467
Rep:
|
Unfortunately a lot of KDE apps also start up kdeinit and other things. Doesn't seem to be any way around it.
|
|
|
07-01-2006, 03:37 PM
|
#18
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,519
Rep:
|
I was afraid that was the case.
What other alternatives are there:
rox filer (which is a little akward, but works)
the xfce file manager
midnight commander in terminal
any other nice file manager's not KDE dependant?
|
|
|
07-01-2006, 10:06 PM
|
#19
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 834
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Ive been using xfce for about 4 hours and it only crashed once, actually I think it was Firefox. I didnt have to reboot this time. I also dumped Firefox for continuous segmentation faults/Crashing and yea, I Downloaded the newest version.
|
|
|
07-01-2006, 10:11 PM
|
#20
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by M$ISBS
Ive been using xfce for about 4 hours and it only crashed once, actually I think it was Firefox. I didnt have to reboot this time. I also dumped Firefox for continuous segmentation faults/Crashing and yea, I Downloaded the newest version.
|
yeah, firefox 1.5.0.4 is known to be very crash-prone for whatever reason...
Last edited by win32sux; 07-01-2006 at 10:14 PM.
|
|
|
07-02-2006, 04:15 AM
|
#21
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2006
Distribution: slackware linux
Posts: 28
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old_Fogie
I was afraid that was the case.
What other alternatives are there:
rox filer (which is a little akward, but works)
the xfce file manager
midnight commander in terminal
any other nice file manager's not KDE dependant?
|
"midnight commander gtk bad-copy": emelfm2. I've installed it coz I don't like rox very much but I must admit that I'm used to surf my dirs in fluxbox via aterm rather than via a file manager... I think that emelfm2 is not really good but is good enough for basic tasks. of course it shows only lists and not icons:
http://emelfm2.net/ScreenShots
another light choice extremely windows-like is XFE (based on fox libs). here shots: http://roland65.free.fr/xfe/index.php?page=screenshots
M
|
|
|
07-02-2006, 07:17 AM
|
#22
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Siberia
Distribution: Slackware & Slamd64. What else is there?
Posts: 1,705
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by M$ISBS
Ive been using xfce for about 4 hours and it only crashed once, actually I think it was Firefox. I didnt have to reboot this time. I also dumped Firefox for continuous segmentation faults/Crashing and yea, I Downloaded the newest version.
|
I run xfce on one of my desktops for months and it never crashed. xfce should not crash. But then I don't run Firebox. Apps should be able to crash without taking the desktop with them.
|
|
|
07-02-2006, 07:21 AM
|
#23
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Siberia
Distribution: Slackware & Slamd64. What else is there?
Posts: 1,705
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old_Fogie
I was afraid that was the case.
What other alternatives are there:
rox filer (which is a little akward, but works)
the xfce file manager
midnight commander in terminal
any other nice file manager's not KDE dependant?
|
What's awkwards about ROX? Of the ones you mentioned, it's head and shoulders above the rest. I liked the xffm (xfce fm) on the Slackware 10.2 as you can navigate extremely quickly but it has many bizarre quirks. And the later versions are so bad that I decided to abandon xffm now. xfe is another fm but it is also very poor from a GUI standpoint, popping up many extraneous windows.
|
|
|
07-02-2006, 07:23 AM
|
#24
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Siberia
Distribution: Slackware & Slamd64. What else is there?
Posts: 1,705
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_absinthe
"midnight commander gtk bad-copy": emelfm2. I've installed it coz I don't like rox very much but I must admit that I'm used to surf my dirs in fluxbox via aterm rather than via a file manager... I think that emelfm2 is not really good but is good enough for basic tasks. of course it shows only lists and not icons:
http://emelfm2.net/ScreenShots
another light choice extremely windows-like is XFE (based on fox libs). here shots: http://roland65.free.fr/xfe/index.php?page=screenshots
M
|
There are a few other things ROX can do. You can associate file types with applications so when you click on a c program in ROX it pops up your choice of IDE, editor, etc. You can do it for any file type.
You can also get it to create menu bars and desktop icons if you use a window manager like flux/black/openbox.
And you can get it to set the desktop wallpaper.
I also didn't like ROX the first few hours. Now I think it's one of the best X apps I've seen.
|
|
|
07-02-2006, 07:37 AM
|
#25
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2006
Distribution: slackware linux
Posts: 28
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randux
There are a few other things ROX can do. You can associate file types with applications so when you click on a c program in ROX it pops up your choice of IDE, editor, etc. You can do it for any file type.
You can also get it to create menu bars and desktop icons if you use a window manager like flux/black/openbox.
And you can get it to set the desktop wallpaper.
I also didn't like ROX the first few hours. Now I think it's one of the best X apps I've seen.
|
ok this is going a bit OT...but: I don't like desktop icons and I'm used to open files inside programs (not click-ing on them) so I just use a file manager to surf inside my FS, my consideration about ROX are just related to my feeling with its interface not related to rox features (coz I don't use them!)
bye,
M
|
|
|
07-02-2006, 11:29 AM
|
#26
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Siberia
Distribution: Slackware & Slamd64. What else is there?
Posts: 1,705
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_real_absinthe
ok this is going a bit OT...but: I don't like desktop icons and I'm used to open files inside programs (not click-ing on them) so I just use a file manager to surf inside my FS, my consideration about ROX are just related to my feeling with its interface not related to rox features (coz I don't use them!)
bye,
M
|
Yeah, I'm with you, I also like a clean desktop with nothing on it. Just saying it in case someone didn't know.
If you run a minimalist wm like black/flux/openbox then the associations make life a little quicker. I can open a new Emacs from ROX on the file I want than I can to start Emacs from a terminal on the file I want. I like to have multiple Emacs running instead of one with multiple buffers because sometimes I'm working on multiple projects at the same time.
I guess if you use a desktop then maybe life is different.
|
|
|
07-02-2006, 11:32 AM
|
#27
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,519
Rep:
|
The ROX filer is a "little" akward to me, like one of the other's here said. It's probably one of those app's that if you use it for a while you can't live without it.
I dont think it's bad, I'm just not used to it. I tried using their rox desktop icons which also gave a nice background, but I lost my custom fluxbox menu when rox desktop is active.
I have to rtfm more on it is what it really boils down to. The rox system is not let's say "an ex-MS user friendly".
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|