SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
having some problem here. I had just installed Slackware 10 using just CD1 - no gnome, no kde on an old laptop. Config as follows:
1) Satellite 330CDT
2) Pentium MMX 266Mhz
3) 4 GB harddisk space (couldn't remember exactly)
4) 64MB RAM
After default installation, I noticed that DMA was not turned on (alert message when booting up).
I did the following
Code:
hdparm -d1 /dev/hda
I got the following message
Code:
setting using_dma to 1 (on)
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
using _dma = 0 (off)
i'm not quite sure what you mean by drive/mobo? I tried a couple of linux distro on this laptop and I don't remember seeing that message. Then again, i never did check with hdparm command.
Well linoox,
I can only guess at this, but the only time I've seen "operation not permitted"
for setting UDMA is when the "ide bus master" was not supported in the kernel.
I think Toshiba chipsets are proprietary and they don't release info about them.
I hope I'm wrong here.
Anyway, keep asking around, some one may have a better answer.
This problem has probably already been solved here and in other threads but I thought I'd say that I had the same problem when I tired to add support for my controller chipset as a module (2.6.7). Compiling it in the kernel fixed it.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.