LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-06-2005, 07:36 PM   #1
megadeth
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 x64
Posts: 136

Rep: Reputation: 15
Dependency Question


Quote:
root@localhost:~# rpm -ivh --force LimeWireLinux.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
/bin/bash is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
/bin/sh is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
j2re >= 1.4.1 is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
libX11.so.6 is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
libXext.so.6 is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
libXss.so.1 is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
libXt.so.6 is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
libc.so.6 is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
libdl.so.2 is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
libgcc_s.so.1 is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
libm.so.6 is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
libpthread.so.0 is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
librt.so.1 is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
libstdc++.so.5 is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2) is needed by LimeWire-free-4.8.1-0
root@localhost:~#
I never had this problem in Fedora. Doesn't Slackware come with latest program dependiencies installed? I had no problem with Fedora. What do I need to do? I understand the GLIBC part, but what is the other stuff I need?
 
Old 04-06-2005, 07:58 PM   #2
egag
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,721

Rep: Reputation: 53
well...with Slackware you do not really use rpm prog.'s
can't you compile it from source ?

...or maybe find a Slack-package for it.

egag
 
Old 04-06-2005, 08:26 PM   #3
cathectic
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: UK, Europe
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 761

Rep: Reputation: 35
Slackware is not Fedora. RPMs are not its native package format, and consequently, Slackware does not have an RPM database and therefore cannot handle the dependencies. You must either:

1) Get hold of the program in *.tgz form
2) Compile from source
3) Use rpm2tgz to convert the RPM to a Slackware package
4) Install the rpm with '--nodeps'

Having looked at the LimeWire website, 1 & 2 are out (but keep in mind for future reference). Therefore, I would go with 3 - convert the rpm to a tgz package using rpm2tgz, then install (using the command 'installpkg') the tgz file.

Last edited by cathectic; 04-06-2005 at 08:27 PM.
 
Old 04-06-2005, 09:10 PM   #4
megadeth
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Fedora Core 4 x64
Posts: 136

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks. I got it to work with rpm2tgz. I thought Slackware didn't come with any dependencies because of the first problem, but now I know it is loaded. Anyways, can I do this with Openoffice also? I want to install the 2.0 beta, can I do that rpm2tgz?
 
Old 04-06-2005, 09:31 PM   #5
BrianW
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 297

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
A better idea for openoffice would be to use the premade Slackware 10.1 package available from LinuxPackages.net, if you do use rpm2tgz from all the RPM's you download from openoffice.org I believe you need to delete the 2 menu packages for RH and SuSE and then also do a few more modifications and symbolic links to get OO2 Beta working.
http://www.linuxpackages.net/search_...ffice&ver=10.1
 
Old 04-06-2005, 10:27 PM   #6
zab
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Big Apple
Distribution: FC
Posts: 12

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally posted by cathectic
Having looked at the LimeWire website, 1 & 2 are out
You're more than welcome to compile LimeWire from source, if you're into that kind of thing. Instructions are at http://www.limewire.org
 
Old 04-07-2005, 10:14 AM   #7
masonm
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Following the white rabbit
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 2,300

Rep: Reputation: 90
You really need to get in the habit of using available slackware packages instead of rpms as this will save you from future headaches.

It's always a good idea to use the package system designed for the distro you're using.
 
Old 04-07-2005, 10:38 PM   #8
alagenchev
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian, Ubuntu
Posts: 223

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
You really need to get in the habit of using available slackware packages instead of rpms
I have an even better idea- install everything from source, that will save you so many problems, it's not even funny, it is also much easier to install than some stupid RPMs or packages, just an advice from me- install checkinstall and then all you have to do is
./configure
make
checkinstall

and you can uninstall using pkgtool, as a matter of fact checkinstall will tell you how to uninstall after installation. Install Open Office from source, I didn't have any problems whatsoever.
 
Old 04-12-2005, 07:33 PM   #9
octinum
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: Slackware 10.1
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 15
Well, installing from sources is not always that easy I think. I am not too deep in Linux, and particularly Slackware(learning fast, though ), so sometimes I can't handle errors given after ./configure script, or some things happen which I don't understand. Example? I compiled arts from sources "just for fun", and i had fun indeed; didn't work, so I fell back to the original Slackware pack I had..
BTW, is that openoffice....tgz package faster than the normal "distro-independent" one?
 
Old 04-12-2005, 07:47 PM   #10
alagenchev
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian, Ubuntu
Posts: 223

Rep: Reputation: 30
I can't compare between the tgz package on slack and the distro independent package on slack, because I have only installed it from source on slack. But it seems like my OpenOffice runs faster on slack than any other distro, so I can't tell if it's from the distribution, or because it is compiled from source. There is a difference though. My OpenOffice used to run slower on FC and SuSe, where I used packages.
 
Old 04-13-2005, 04:25 PM   #11
octinum
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: Slackware 10.1
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 15
I use the installation files from openoffice.org, Slack starts it a little bit faster than SuSE(which I used previously), but it still takes 12 seconds or more, after clicking on the button.

PS: I didn't want to open a topic just for this, should I??
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New mplayer dependency question Iacchus Linux - General 1 05-18-2004 03:00 AM
dependency question jax8 Linux - Newbie 2 03-31-2004 08:39 AM
Dependency question... madiyaan Linux - Newbie 4 06-03-2003 02:27 PM
RPM dependency question tarballed Linux - Software 5 05-13-2003 11:11 AM
Dependency Question ? g0dzuki99 Linux - General 5 12-13-2002 08:58 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration