LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-21-2005, 09:11 PM   #1
BarfBag
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 100

Rep: Reputation: 15
darkstar login:


Slackware newbie here.

I installed Slackware (10.2) on an old Pentium II someone gave me.

The problem is, I don't know the login name and password! I didn't fill in anything for it during the instalation, but it's asking for one. It boots, and I see "darkstar login:" but again, I have no clue what to put there. What do I do?

BTW - Just a little heads up, SUSE runs slower then Winblows XP on a Pentium II (400 MHz, 512 MB of RAM). Yep, I installed XP just to see how it would perform. It sucked, but not as much as SUSE. O.o That's why I'm going for Slackware. SUSE's still my favorite distro, but NEVER install it on an old system.
 
Old 11-21-2005, 09:18 PM   #2
Linux.tar.gz
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Paris
Distribution: Slackware forever.
Posts: 2,534

Rep: Reputation: 100Reputation: 100
Login is root. The password is the one which is asked at the very end of installation.
 
Old 11-21-2005, 09:20 PM   #3
rkelsen
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 4,445
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553Reputation: 2553
Re: darkstar login:

Quote:
Originally posted by BarfBag
The problem is, I don't know the login name and password! I didn't fill in anything for it during the instalation, but it's asking for one. It boots, and I see "darkstar login:" but again, I have no clue what to put there. What do I do?
Username: root
Password: just hit enter if you didn't set one upon installation

Got me the first time I ever installed Linux too...
 
Old 11-22-2005, 01:11 AM   #4
davidsrsb
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 current
Posts: 770

Rep: Reputation: 33
darkstar is the default machine name.

Maybe from the John Carpenter SciFi movie?
 
Old 11-22-2005, 04:18 AM   #5
Lim45
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Northern England
Distribution: Debian Wheezy 64-bit
Posts: 128

Rep: Reputation: 15
Bit of Slackware trivia here, from slackbook.org:

Quote:
Darkstar

The default hostname in Slackware; your computer will be called darkstar if you do not specify some other name.
One of Patrick Volkerding's development machines, named after "Dark Star", a song by the Grateful Dead.
Easy enough to change if you want to, but I rather like it.
 
Old 11-22-2005, 09:51 AM   #6
2damncommon
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Calif, USA
Distribution: PCLINUXOS
Posts: 2,918

Rep: Reputation: 103Reputation: 103
Quote:
BTW - Just a little heads up, SUSE runs slower then Winblows XP on a Pentium II (400 MHz, 512 MB of RAM). Yep, I installed XP just to see how it would perform. It sucked, but not as much as SUSE. O.o That's why I'm going for Slackware. SUSE's still my favorite distro, but NEVER install it on an old system.
YAST eats up a huge amount of resources on a slow PC.

I was running a home server on a Pentium 100 with 64MB RAM (text mode).
Originally running Debian Woody it ran fine.
I thought I would try Suse 9.1 and utilize YAST. I had to create a swap partition for the install program to use and after install many YAST functions took minutes. It was not acceptable at all.
Both installs were base systems in text mode with about the same minimal programs. The big difference was the YAST overhead.

Just prior to doing an upgrade I was running a Celeron 500 with 256MB RAM and Suse 9.1. It was okay but I had to drop into ICE rather than KDE to even start Mplayer. Again Mplayer ran fine in Debian Woody on the same PC.

YAST creates overhead to begin with that is not present in Slackware.
 
Old 11-22-2005, 10:35 AM   #7
mjjzf
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Valby, Denmark / Citizen of the Web
Distribution: Slackware 14.1
Posts: 879

Rep: Reputation: 39
I always change the prompt as one of the first things after installing. I have a couple of things I always but in ~/.bashrc. So I don't see much of darkstar...
 
Old 11-22-2005, 12:30 PM   #8
Cogar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: It varies, but usually within 100 feet of a keyboard.
Distribution: Fedora 10, Kubuntu 8.04, Puppy 4.1.2, openSUSE 11.2
Posts: 1,126

Rep: Reputation: 52
Thank you for asking the question. I was also wondering who "darkstar" was. I did a search and found nothing until today.
 
Old 11-22-2005, 12:35 PM   #9
Cogar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: It varies, but usually within 100 feet of a keyboard.
Distribution: Fedora 10, Kubuntu 8.04, Puppy 4.1.2, openSUSE 11.2
Posts: 1,126

Rep: Reputation: 52
Re: darkstar login:

Quote:
Originally posted by BarfBag
BTW - Just a little heads up, SUSE runs slower then Winblows XP on a Pentium II (400 MHz, 512 MB of RAM). Yep, I installed XP just to see how it would perform. It sucked, but not as much as SUSE. O.o That's why I'm going for Slackware. SUSE's still my favorite distro, but NEVER install it on an old system.
Did you try running one of the "lighter" windows managers with SUSE instead of KDE or GNOME? FVWM seems to run a lot faster than KDE--and it looks nice (to me) as well.
 
Old 11-22-2005, 12:50 PM   #10
chrisortiz
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Distribution: Slackware, and of course the super delux uber knoppix universal live recovery cd
Posts: 429

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
The problem is, I don't know the login name and password! I didn't fill in anything for it during the instalation, but it's asking for one. It boots, and I see "darkstar login:" but again, I have no clue what to put there. What do I do?
umm, i've never messed with SUSE.... I kinda thought loggin in was the first step. Did they throw a point and click gui in SUSE (like Mandrake) or something?

Last edited by chrisortiz; 11-22-2005 at 01:06 PM.
 
Old 11-22-2005, 01:01 PM   #11
Cogar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: It varies, but usually within 100 feet of a keyboard.
Distribution: Fedora 10, Kubuntu 8.04, Puppy 4.1.2, openSUSE 11.2
Posts: 1,126

Rep: Reputation: 52
Quote:
Originally posted by chrisortiz
umm, i've never messed with SUSE.... I kinda thought loggin in was the first step. Did they throw in a point and click gui (like Mandrake) or something?
The post was referring to Slackware 10.2 after it was installed. When you start the system, you can get the command line prompt "darkstar login:"
 
Old 11-22-2005, 01:14 PM   #12
dive
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,467

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
But you can change host and domain name in network setup. Mine is currently TheVoid
 
Old 11-22-2005, 07:27 PM   #13
Woodsman
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Distribution: Slackware 14.1
Posts: 3,482

Rep: Reputation: 546Reputation: 546Reputation: 546Reputation: 546Reputation: 546Reputation: 546
Quote:
BTW - Just a little heads up, SUSE runs slower then Winblows XP on a Pentium II (400 MHz, 512 MB of RAM). Yep, I installed XP just to see how it would perform. It sucked, but not as much as SUSE. O.o That's why I'm going for Slackware. SUSE's still my favorite distro, but NEVER install it on an old system.
I use Slackware 10.1 with KDE 3.3.2 on two "old" boxes: a 400 MHz K6-III+ with a 66 MHz FSB and a 350 MHz PII Deschutes with a 100 MHz FSB. Both with 256 MB of RAM and 40 GB Barracuda IV hard drives. The K6 box uses a Diamond Stealth 3D 3000 video card with 4MB of RAM and the PII uses an AGP Creative Labs Voodoo Banshee with 16 MB of RAM. Neither box is a screamer by today's standards.

With my current installation, screen response without X is as fast as I could want. In X/KDE I am quite content with the screen response. I suspect I'll see a nudgingly improved response when I update to KDE 3.4.3. My NT4 OS is still faster by comparison (sigh), but my experience lays to rest the old fallacy that KDE is bloated and can't run on "old" boxes. I'm happy without spending a lot of buckazoids on bleeding edge hardware.
 
Old 11-28-2005, 06:26 AM   #14
lockout
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Riga, LV
Distribution: Slackware/Gentoo
Posts: 26

Rep: Reputation: 15
Anyway if u dont manage to boot into slackware without knowing password there always is a backdoor.
1. Boot into box with any available rescue disc (e.g. slackware cd2) or linux live cd.
2. Mount ur root partition.
3. Open ur mnted root partition, open /etc/shadow. The first entry usually is teh root user entry. Delete anything thereis between first and second colon (':') -
was:
Quote:
root:$1$4O81ng34$vAF0tZR29RoQ71:13028:0:::::
becomes:
Quote:
root::13028:0:::::
4. reboot ur box
5. when asked for login just enter 'root' at the prompt and hit enter. Viola! No password required!

Duhhh.. just dont tell u allready didnt knew this :^)
 
Old 11-29-2005, 01:39 PM   #15
Furlinastis
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Ball of Confusion
Distribution: Artix,Arch,Slackware,Bluewhite64
Posts: 261

Rep: Reputation: 40
Quote:
Originally posted by lockout
Anyway if u dont manage to boot into slackware without knowing password there always is a backdoor.
1. Boot into box with any available rescue disc (e.g. slackware cd2) or linux live cd.
2. Mount ur root partition.
3. Open ur mnted root partition, open /etc/shadow. The first entry usually is teh root user entry. Delete anything thereis between first and second colon (':') -
was:
becomes:
4. reboot ur box
5. when asked for login just enter 'root' at the prompt and hit enter. Viola! No password required!

Duhhh.. just dont tell u allready didnt knew this :^)
That's way to easy. Is there a way to make shadow unwritable, so nobody can change it once the passwords are set?
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Darkstar Login Bengooch7 Linux - Newbie 6 04-24-2005 08:54 AM
darkstar login? (9) zokter Slackware 3 08-26-2003 04:51 PM
darkstar login? BmxFace Slackware 6 07-04-2003 04:36 PM
Darkstar login Gnux Slackware 10 07-03-2003 04:17 PM
DarkStar login bebleu Slackware 5 05-16-2003 04:56 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration