SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
any experience with installing slackware on a machine running a celeron cpu??? just curious to know if there are any performance problems with those chips on linux.
i don't actually have one, but i saw a pc for sale on a newsgroup for 400 bucks and it's a celeron 1.7 ghz. i was just curious if people have run into problems with compiling and stuff.
>> The ones that are based on socket 478 are great!
For a desktop computer running linux, the celeron is a good chip.
But for the same price as a celeron chip you can get an AthlonXP that can really out preform the celeron. . .<<
Yes, in addition, looks like the new Celeron D and Sempron provide adequate performance/price - nice additions - we seem to be getting a reasonable deal these days re. processors and mainboards - all good
I just upgraded my 6 year old slackware based home server from an Intel PIII w/SE440BX motherboard to a celeron 2.0Ghz with an Intel D865GBFL motherboard, and I couldn't be happier. It runs very stable, is quiet, uses low power, and runs very cool, at least compared to my space heater...er...Athlon gaming system.
Your needs may vary, but these things are important to me due to the fact the machine is NEVER turned off, and the configuration will last me for my server needs for several years. If you want absolute price vs. performance and just plan on upgrading again within a year, go Athlon. But if you are looking for a higher quality and stable machine that you want to keep running for 3 or more years, definately go the Intel / Celeron route.
Yep, I like a good cool, long running system, but now the Xp based semprons look good too running less watts than the celeron, so another way to go perhaps...
The problem with Celerons and Durons is the dodgy motherboards sold with them, some ALI and SIS chipsets do give problems. The CPUs themselves work just fine.
The Celeron is really just a Pentium 4 (or 3, from that era), but with less cache and a slower bus. Theoretically you could overclock the bus and lower the multiplier to achieve similar performance, but that's beyond the scope of this thread.
reguardless of what the zelots for source based distros say (*cough gentoo*). Binary distros rarely run into problems having to do with archetecture compatability. especially running a 1.7ghz celeron which is basically a pentium 4 with a small cash.
Iv been running slackware 9.1 on a 500mhz celeron for about 9 months w/ no problems what so ever.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.