Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
06-13-2013, 03:25 PM
|
#181
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2005
Distribution: Slackware, RHEL
Posts: 1,271
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by willysr
|
I went ahead and applied this patch, but it did not fix the issue. Getting the same behavior still unfortunately.
|
|
|
06-13-2013, 07:16 PM
|
#182
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Jogja, Indonesia
Distribution: Slackware-Current
Posts: 4,795
|
You need to apply 2 commits, not just the commit i posted before
I tested with git release and it seems to fix the issue here. Hopefully they will make a new release ASAP
|
|
|
06-13-2013, 10:06 PM
|
#183
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2005
Distribution: Slackware, RHEL
Posts: 1,271
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by willysr
You need to apply 2 commits, not just the commit i posted before
I tested with git release and it seems to fix the issue here. Hopefully they will make a new release ASAP
|
Ah, good to know. Hopefully, that will be released soon.
|
|
|
06-17-2013, 05:20 AM
|
#184
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2005
Distribution: Slackware, RHEL
Posts: 1,271
|
Went ahead and built mate-screensaver from the latest git branch. As you reported, everything now works as it should!
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
06-17-2013, 07:24 AM
|
#185
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Jogja, Indonesia
Distribution: Slackware-Current
Posts: 4,795
|
i have tested and currently used mate-screensaver from git repository for now as it works as intended, but i will until they released it as tarball before updating the git repository
|
|
|
06-17-2013, 07:57 AM
|
#186
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2005
Distribution: Slackware, RHEL
Posts: 1,271
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by willysr
i have tested and currently used mate-screensaver from git repository for now as it works as intended, but i will until they released it as tarball before updating the git repository
|
I just got impatient. Ha, ha! It was frustrating me having to enter my password every 5 minutes or so.
|
|
|
06-17-2013, 08:19 AM
|
#187
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,311
Rep:
|
Thought I'd try it (on Slack64 14.0), even though I've said some sarcastic things about Gnome in the past. Might be growing on me. Seems OK, so far.
|
|
|
06-17-2013, 09:35 AM
|
#188
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: 127.0.0.1
Distribution: Slackware and OpenBSD
Posts: 740
Original Poster
Rep:
|
@BrianL - glad to hear it. The thing I like about MATE versus regular old GNOME 2 is how stripped down it is. For example, I never liked how Evolution seemed to be so tied in to GNOME but since the MATE developers are keeping it light and simple, it's pretty easy to keep it modular and relatively small. All the base packages are only about 47MB IIRC.
|
|
|
06-18-2013, 12:23 AM
|
#190
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Pensacola, FL
Distribution: Slackware64® Current & Arch
Posts: 1,092
Rep:
|
Anyone else seeing when opening Places > Computer > and trying to open a physical drive you are greeted with this error:
Unable to mount location
Can't mount file
|
|
|
06-18-2013, 12:29 AM
|
#191
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Jogja, Indonesia
Distribution: Slackware-Current
Posts: 4,795
|
Yes, it happened here as welll
|
|
|
06-18-2013, 12:37 AM
|
#192
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 234
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SqdnGuns
Anyone else seeing when opening Places > Computer > and trying to open a physical drive you are greeted with this error:
Unable to mount location
Can't mount file
|
Same here. I suspect that is because mate tries to mount that drive, but it's already mounted by the system, so it fails instead of just opening it. If you attach any USB storage device, that drive can be mounted or accessed via Places > Computer just fine. I think there should be a way to at least hide your local drives from Computer? Because I also use mount to link some directories together, and Computer displays these as well so my Computer is kind of polluted: http://atviras.lt/mwf/attach/57/7957/caja.png
Also, sometimes when unmounting my pen drives from caja I used to get error, cannot access computer:/// but that seem to be gone now (not sure if it disappeared after xdg-open patch or after update to 1.6.1).
|
|
|
06-18-2013, 12:47 AM
|
#193
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Pensacola, FL
Distribution: Slackware64® Current & Arch
Posts: 1,092
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Totoro-kun
Same here. I suspect that is because mate tries to mount that drive, but it's already mounted by the system, so it fails instead of just opening it. If you attach any USB storage device, that drive can be mounted or accessed via Places > Computer just fine. I think there should be a way to at least hide your local drives from Computer? Because I also use mount to link some directories together, and Computer displays these as well so my Computer is kind of polluted: http://atviras.lt/mwf/attach/57/7957/caja.png
Also, sometimes when unmounting my pen drives from caja I used to get error, cannot access computer:/// but that seem to be gone now (not sure if it disappeared after xdg-open patch or after update to 1.6.1).
|
Yup, no problems with a thumbdrive. Fortunately I have not received any errors removing various thumbdrives.
I'd love to see a polished version of Mate included with the next Slackware release. I have played Mint's version of Mate and enjoy using it.
|
|
|
06-18-2013, 01:02 AM
|
#194
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Pensacola, FL
Distribution: Slackware64® Current & Arch
Posts: 1,092
Rep:
|
|
|
|
06-18-2013, 01:03 AM
|
#195
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2010
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 234
Rep:
|
I did a quick search, and it seems there is similar issue in Linux mint too: http://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopi...f=206&t=123474
Also, there is a tip for Linux mint to hide them, but I cannot find such place to be able to configure drives showed in Computer:
Quote:
In addition to the Computer and Home icons, Linux Mint adds an icon to the desktop for every removable drive that you attach to your system. The icons can be hidden by these steps:
Go to Menu > Applications > Preferences > Desktop Settings
Untick Computer, Home and Mounted Volumes, then close the window.
The drive icons as well as Computer and Home icons will then disappear from the desktop. Remember that you can always access the drives from Menu > Places.
|
http://www.techsupportalert.com/cont...te-edition.htm
I remember simmilar issue in Thunar some time ago. Then people used to solve this problem by configuring udisks to hide certain drives: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=882105
but this solution did not work for me:
Quote:
Well, after perusing the source for udisks, I got the LVM hidden at least. The answer is in the section 7 manpage for udisks:
UDISKS_PRESENTATION_HIDE
If set to 1 this is a hint to presentation level software that the device should not be shown to the
user.
So, I made a new rule in /etc/udev/rules.d:
KERNEL=="sda2", ENV{UDISKS_PRESENTATION_HIDE}="1"
Where sda2 is my LVM. It's gone now! smile Network is still here, though. I'll be working on that one next.
As for the "refreshing" dbus question, I think I should just create another thread for that, so I'm marking this one as [SOLVED].
Thanks for the tip on udisks, R00KIE.
|
Maybe in Slackware we need different syntax for udev rules? Or Mate does not use udisks?
EDIT!!** Do not mind about tip for Linux Mint. It is meant to hide volumes and other icons from desktop and you can do that easy via dconf-editor > org > mate > caja > desktop and untick some fields there **!!
Last edited by Totoro-kun; 06-18-2013 at 01:10 AM.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|