LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Slackware (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/)
-   -   build kernels; losing modules (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/build-kernels%3B-losing-modules-511746/)

mcnalu 12-18-2006 06:32 PM

build kernels; losing modules
 
I'm returning to slackware after many years away (8 years, I think). I've only been playing with it for a few days, but I'm getting into kernel building so as to make all the lovely hardware in laptop come to life.

However, I've hit an annoying problem - please excuse me if the answer is posted already, but I just couldn't find it.

After I've compiled a new kernel (no patches, just menuconfig
option changes) I find all my modules in /lib/modules have gone, specifically, alsa stuff and rt2500.o for my wireless device.

This isn't a big surprise as both are built outside /usr/src/linux. I can build them manually, and speed this up a bit with scripts, but it is an annoyance having to do this every time I build the kernel.

So, my question is: when I type "make modules", can I arrange things so that my alsa and rt2500 modules are built and installed too?

thanks

Andrew

osor 12-18-2006 06:38 PM

It depends. To install the modules, generally, you do “make modules-install” after they’re built. Alsa drivers should be in the kernel. Anything built outside the kernel (e.g., rt2500) will have to be rebuilt while running the new kernel.

willysr 12-18-2006 07:19 PM

correction:
"make modules_install"

gnashley 12-19-2006 12:26 AM

I usually rename the folder with my existing modules before running make modules_install. If you do that then you can copy the extra modules you need into the new module tree.

mcnalu 12-19-2006 03:07 PM

OK, thanks for the replies.

I do make modules_install, but it doesn't affect alsa or the rt2500 driver.

alsa did work "out the box" but it stopped working after my first kernel build, so I downloaded the source from the alsa website, which source now resides outside the /usr/src/linux dir.

Moving the /lib/modules dir out the way and then moving it back after the build doesn't help much because, for example, rt2500.o throws up errors with the newly compiled kernel - so I have to recompile it every time.

I just thought that I could somehow incorporate my modules to be compiled and installed
with make modules and and make modules_install.

gnashley 12-20-2006 12:11 AM

If you compile in support for "Set module versions" you can use modules which are compiled outside the kernel source tree. You can put them in a folder like /lib/modules/misc so they won't be removed when re-installing kernel modules.

onebuck 12-20-2006 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcnalu
OK, thanks for the replies.

I do make modules_install, but it doesn't affect alsa or the rt2500 driver.

alsa did work "out the box" but it stopped working after my first kernel build, so I downloaded the source from the alsa website, which source now resides outside the /usr/src/linux dir.

Moving the /lib/modules dir out the way and then moving it back after the build doesn't help much because, for example, rt2500.o throws up errors with the newly compiled kernel - so I have to recompile it every time.

I just thought that I could somehow incorporate my modules to be compiled and installed
with make modules and and make modules_install.

Hi,

You could just edit the 'Makefile' and add to the 'Extraversion=' a unique version level, ie; -1a or 1b ...

That way you would have a unique compile with /lib/modules/kernel-'Extraversion_level'. Your original kernel modules will remain. This will also prevent you from changing the original tree.

When I compile, I use '/home/build/linux' as my source therefore I don't have a problem with my builds. I always use the 'Extraversion' to give unique compiles.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 AM.