being able to recompile packages is important, pls fix all non building packages
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Yes, that is why Slackware is still around as the oldest actively maintained distro - because its developer sticks to his master plan and does not run around in an air of chaos and panic like those other distros.
nether dose slack ware jump on the latest bad idea band wagon ie s*d
Distribution: slackware, slackware from scratch, LFS, slackware [arm], linux Mint...
Posts: 1,564
Rep:
While compiling slackware-current there's still a special case: gst-plugins-base0
I compiles fine on x86_64 but not on x86: need a patch from LFS only for that case.
Distribution: slackware, slackware from scratch, LFS, slackware [arm], linux Mint...
Posts: 1,564
Rep:
Another special case: kate
If you try to compile it solely on a pure slackware-current x86 or x86_64, it fails with the following message:
-----------------------
sip: ::KFontChooser ctor argument 5 has an unsupported type for a Python signature - provide a valid type, %MethodCode and a C++ signature
make[2]: *** [addons/kate/pate/sip/CMakeFiles/python_module_PyKate4_kate.dir/build.make:64: addons/kate/pate/sip/kate/sipkatepart0.cpp] Error 1
make[2]: *** Suppression du fichier ��addons/kate/pate/sip/kate/sipkatepart0.cpp��
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:3513: addons/kate/pate/sip/CMakeFiles/python_module_PyKate4_kate.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:141: all] Error 2
kdebindings:kate failed to build.
-------------------------
But when you compile it in a complete Slackware From Scratch system, it builds fine by adding the following patch to kate's patch:
-----------------------
cat > cmake-policy.diff << "EOF"
Author: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>
Description: Update cmake version & policy.
Set cmake_mininum_required to match kdelibs policy and enable newer cmake
policies.
Forwarded: not-needed
Last-Update: 2016-06-19
I wonder if I should mark this thread as resolved, and start a new one, something Slackware CI (continuous integration)
but I do not know how huge the interest on such a topic is
Glad to see you got things working and happy. I totally get not wanting to deal with learning then new math all the time. I avoided uefi too until I went NMVE up to that point I used the legacy mode; booting systems off sata. When I switched to nmve I was kinda forced at that point not wanting to deal with altering LILO itself.
I can tell you this. Its a few steps to get elilo working but once it is its super to deal with a working system. So if you take the effort at some point or on some future system to getting EFI to see elilo once you get beyond that point you'd probably find the 'new' to actually be a minor improvement.
Glad to see you got things working and happy. I totally get not wanting to deal with learning then new math all the time. I avoided uefi too until I went NMVE up to that point I used the legacy mode; booting systems off sata. When I switched to nmve I was kinda forced at that point not wanting to deal with altering LILO itself.
I can tell you this. Its a few steps to get elilo working but once it is its super to deal with a working system. So if you take the effort at some point or on some future system to getting EFI to see elilo once you get beyond that point you'd probably find the 'new' to actually be a minor improvement.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.