LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-06-2004, 02:54 PM   #1
kiko
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 47

Rep: Reputation: 15
bare.i bareacpi.i of 30-JAN-2004


I got several times system failure during booting/installation with the content the processor's registers printed on da screen recently while trying to install by booting with bare.i/bareacpi.i diskett.

Any one else experienced that ?

Spec:
asus tx97-e, IDE ibm/maxtor 4 gb HD (LBA mode)..
 
Old 02-06-2004, 03:17 PM   #2
DrOzz
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Sydney, Nova Scotia, Canada
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 4,185

Rep: Reputation: 60
i'm having problems trying to decifer exactly what your trying to get across ....
are you getting a successful boot with errors during the boot ?
or is the boot just failing at some point ?

and are you able to post the errors you are receiving ?
 
Old 02-06-2004, 03:30 PM   #3
kiko
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 47

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I got 1 or 2 times succesfull boot, but when I tried setup it goes woes LIKE kernel error with those CPU register printed on screen.

But most time even often failed to boot bare.i n booting with bareacpi.i failed not predictable, sometime ater inserting install.1 sometime even in the middle of booting bareacpi.i after entering "ramdisk hdd=ide-scsi" ..

I installed a usb 1.1 controller on mobo, but it has been took off from mobo. Several modification on BIOS setting also, reset back still a little modification that "I don't think responsible.

The purpose of the post is to get confirmation whether someone got the similar problem with bare.i bareacpi.i, I almost can not remember to have such errors with previous bare.i of 01-DEC-2003 ??
 
Old 02-06-2004, 10:53 PM   #4
kiko
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 47

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
It was my mistakes, I used fdformat to format all the disketts, that is a little bit harmless, but I used stfdprm to set other parameter 1440/720 for fdformat (see also /etc/fdprm, it is of 1994) ! So fdformat must be using that bad parameter to format the disketts. That could be the cause of the mal/failing to boot the fdformat formatted disketts.

Now after reformated the disketts with dos-format, I can boot with them bare.i, install.1, install.2, null problemo..
But one prblem still exists, the network.dsk disk of few days ago that i got from slacksite was still of DEC-2003 n used kernel 2.4.23. Those newer bare.i, install.{1,2} are compiled with 2.4.24, so when I used that old network-disk to try to load the 8139too module, it failed to load somehow.

I then stole a network.dsk form zuuls.slw.. current-tree, it is newer (JAN-2004), I got it also to load 8139too succesfully, but somehow when I try to mount an exported nfs directory, it said:

Portmap: not registered ... (like that exported 10.x.y.z:/path/to/current-tree not exported or unvisible to him), n I couldn't find any /etc/rc.d/rc.portmap script somewhere ?

I even tried to force setup to use that exported dir but it failed with the same error. I can ping from the installing host to the exporting host, no error, 100% answered/replied, any clue ?

----
N, u know wut ?

Slackware is definitive the winner, undoubtfully ..

N

Winner take all !!

Last edited by kiko; 02-06-2004 at 11:13 PM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
bareacpi.i vs bare.i robert_edwards Slackware 2 03-07-2005 06:40 PM
Changing from bareacpi.i to bare.i Shagrath239 Slackware 4 02-10-2005 04:32 PM
LQ security report - Jan 27th 2004 Capt_Caveman Linux - Security 2 01-30-2004 09:29 PM
bare.i or bareacpi.i for my toshiba laptop? grassapa Slackware 1 09-28-2003 10:24 AM
bare.i or bareacpi.i for toshiba laptop? grassapa Linux - Laptop and Netbook 1 09-27-2003 07:36 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration