Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
03-27-2005, 04:43 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Distribution: Xubuntu, Mythbuntu, Lubuntu, Picuntu, Mint 18.1, Debian Jessie
Posts: 1,207
Rep:
|
bandwith tester
There's a bandwith testing extension that I use with Firefox 1.0.2. Having DSL, I've never been able to download faster than 90 kb/s (even late at night) with wget. Bandwith tester indicates a max speed of 230 kb/s (this is based on 5 small test downloads). How is this possible on a pc with 1 user (I'm not on any network except for the internet)?
Last edited by linuxhippy; 03-27-2005 at 05:07 PM.
|
|
|
03-27-2005, 05:12 PM
|
#2
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870
|
what's your DSL speed supposed to be??
post the link to the extension so we can try it and compare results...
Last edited by win32sux; 03-27-2005 at 05:15 PM.
|
|
|
03-27-2005, 05:44 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Distribution: Xubuntu, Mythbuntu, Lubuntu, Picuntu, Mint 18.1, Debian Jessie
Posts: 1,207
Original Poster
Rep:
|
That's a good question-I know that last year Verizon was saying it would be 100 kb/s depending on your location. Not sure if they increased it.
The extension link is here: https://addons.update.mozilla.org/ex...Windows&id=178
|
|
|
03-27-2005, 09:34 PM
|
#4
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870
|
okay, i tried the extension... i'm on a 320Kbps connection and the extension reported i was at 70Kbps which is insane, LOL... i imagine the server where the files are hosted isn't optimized for bandwidth tests (you need a lot of bandwidth and server speed for that kinda thing) or something... i don't know...
but if i wget this file:
http://cowbox.coe.uky.edu/pub/slackw...7.0-i486-4.tgz
i get a download speed of at least 40KB/s, and since i'm supposed to have a 320Kbps conection that means i'm fine (320 kilobits = 40 kilobytes)...
BTW, i've found the road runner tests work well:
http://www.new.rr.com/TechTips/speedtest/speed.asp
http://www.satx.rr.com/support/speedtest/speed.asp
of course no bandwidth test will never be 100% accurate...
just my two cents...
Last edited by win32sux; 03-27-2005 at 09:36 PM.
|
|
|
03-27-2005, 09:39 PM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870
|
BTW, if your wget never gets passed 90K then maybe your connection is currently around 720Kbps (90 * 8 = 720)... and if that's the case then the 230Kbps that the firefox extension reported is probably bogus, like the 70Kbps that it gave me on my 320Kbps connection...
|
|
|
03-27-2005, 09:45 PM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Montana
Posts: 304
Rep:
|
Eh, I'd stay away from that. It seems to be giving me really low/weird results even though I'm on a 45Mbps EDU.
Try this site instead: http://www.broadbandreports.com/stest
EDIT: As a reference: (poor results on dslreports tonight )
2005-03-27 21:46:54 EST: 8351 / 2166
Your download speed : 8551581 bps, or 8351 kbps.
A 1043.8 KB/sec transfer rate.
Your upload speed : 2218152 bps, or 2166 kbps.
And from the item you posted:
Results: ~477.5Kbps
Last edited by BrianW; 03-27-2005 at 09:50 PM.
|
|
|
03-28-2005, 12:39 AM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Distribution: slackware-current
Posts: 379
Rep:
|
For the most part bandwith testing is not very accurate. It depends on the location of the server. A server may be slow a particular day or hour becuase of to many people downloading. It also depends on the particular route you happen to take. To many factors to be an accurate test.
I'd say the best way to get a true representation of you download speed is to go to some domain that you know these factors are minimal and download a big file from them. Go to the really well know domains... microsoft.com is one
|
|
|
03-28-2005, 06:01 AM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Distribution: Xubuntu, Mythbuntu, Lubuntu, Picuntu, Mint 18.1, Debian Jessie
Posts: 1,207
Original Poster
Rep:
|
320 kilobits = 40 kilobytes
Why? Is there a link that explains bandwith speed?
|
|
|
03-28-2005, 06:12 AM
|
#9
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Haarlem, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware, FreeBSD
Posts: 178
Rep:
|
1 byte consists of 8 bits, so to convert from Kilo BITS per second (which is used to specify line speeds) to Kilo BYTES per second you have to devide it by 8.
|
|
|
03-28-2005, 06:13 AM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware (current); Gentoo (newbie)
Posts: 142
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by linuxhippy
320 kilobits = 40 kilobytes
Why? Is there a link that explains bandwith speed?
|
These are the basic computer units.
1 byte = 8 bits
1 KB (kilobyte, ie 1024 bytes) = 8 kb (kilobits, ie 8096 bits)
To convert from bits to bytes, just divide by 8.
eg. I'm on a 5 Mbps pipeline. In bytes, that translates to roughly 600 KB/s
|
|
|
03-28-2005, 07:41 AM
|
#11
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Finland
Distribution: Arch and Maemo (N900)
Posts: 32
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by major.tom
These are the basic computer units.
1 byte = 8 bits
1 KB (kilobyte, ie 1024 bytes) = 8 kb (kilobits, ie 8096 bits)
To convert from bits to bytes, just divide by 8.
eg. I'm on a 5 Mbps pipeline. In bytes, that translates to roughly 600 KB/s
|
And to determine your maximum download speed, you need to take into account that TCP/IP spends a few bits here and there for just packet header information like packet destination, origin and such. The payload part (where the data you're downloading is) of a TCP/IP packet is 80-90% (?) size of the whole packet. And that's why my 8Mb doesn't download 1000kB/s.
Oh, and - unless you're talking about an ethernet connection - that's not enough. Most of us here prolly have xDSL, and that's not transparent either, it takes a certain amount of control data too.
Last edited by nitroid; 03-28-2005 at 07:42 AM.
|
|
|
03-28-2005, 04:42 PM
|
#12
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870
|
Quote:
Originally posted by linuxhippy
320 kilobits = 40 kilobytes
Why? Is there a link that explains bandwith speed?
|
sure, here's a link:
http://www.speedguide.net/read_articles.php?id=115
keep in mind that usually when you use a capital "B" it stands for "byte" and a lowercase "b" stands for "bit"...
like:
KB = kilobyte
Kb = kilobit
bits are usually used to measure connection speeds... bytes are usually used to measure file sizes and download speeds...
i have a 320 kilobit per second connection... my maximum download rate is 40 kilobytes per second...
hence, a person with a 56K (56Kbps) dial-up modem would be able to download at a max rate of 7KB/s (56 / 8 = 7), but we know that the actual (FCC??) limit for those devices is around 53K and add to that all the overhead and well any dial-up user that gets something like downloads at 5.x KB/s has a VERY GOOD connection... from what i've seen they tend to hover more around 3.x and 4.x due to factors like line noise, etc... but you get the point... bits for connections... bytes for files and downloads... usually... hehe...
|
|
|
03-28-2005, 06:56 PM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Distribution: Xubuntu, Mythbuntu, Lubuntu, Picuntu, Mint 18.1, Debian Jessie
Posts: 1,207
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Very informative-thanks all!
Oh, when I had a dial up ISP and US Robotics 56k Performance Pro modem, I would get 5.x kilobytes per second for a download. Guess I have a VERY GOOD connection with Verizon wires!!
I'm in USA-I read that in Japan they are provided with twice the bandwith then I currently have (I get 720 kilobit per second connection) for half the price (I pay $30/mo + $2 tax)!
Anyone from Japan here that can verify that?
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|