LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-11-2013, 11:15 AM   #121
ponce
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Pisa, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,097

Rep: Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174

Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
He first proposed the idea, so I don't see how you can say that he doesn't want to do it unless you know him personally.
but I haven't said that, please read again what I've posted.
 
Old 06-11-2013, 12:37 PM   #122
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponce View Post
probably if there were no stable branches, Greg would have more time for skating, snowboarding and to stay with the family so, personally (and considering also your thoughts, GazL), I hope there will be less LTS kernels in the future...
So, basically you are implying that GKH:

1) does not have enough time to do skating, snowboarding and being with the family (rather specific things, so I was assuming you know him)
2) would rather be skating, snowboarding and being with the family than working on the LTS kernel (would also require knowing him)

You either know him, or you made this up. That's basically what I'm saying.

Personally, I hope he does exactly what he wants to do, and has no pressure from me or anyone to do or not to do what he wants.
 
Old 06-11-2013, 12:55 PM   #123
ruario
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Oslo, Norway
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,557

Rep: Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761
@H_TeXMeX_H: Even if he is only assuming, it isn't an unreasonable assumption IMHO, particularly spending more time with the family (most people will tell you that they would prefer do this). No need to get all hot and bothered about ponce's comment. It is just that, a comment.
 
Old 06-11-2013, 12:57 PM   #124
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroX View Post
No problems here with the latest AMD beta driver (13.6) and custom kernel-3.9.4

Did you have to patch it or did it work out of the box? Haven't tried the Beta yet.
 
Old 06-11-2013, 01:02 PM   #125
BroX
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware64-current, SlackwareARM-15.0
Posts: 833

Rep: Reputation: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD View Post
Did you have to patch it or did it work out of the box? Haven't tried the Beta yet.
Out of the box. But --buildpkg failed so I installed it straight away using the --force
 
Old 06-11-2013, 01:04 PM   #126
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruario View Post
@H_TeXMeX_H: Even if he is only assuming, it isn't an unreasonable assumption IMHO, particularly spending more time with the family (most people will tell you that they would prefer do this). No need to get all hot and bothered about ponce's comment. It is just that, a comment.
Alright, but the comment bothered me, because I feel it detracts from the value of GKH's work, even tho it may have been said with good intentions.
 
Old 06-11-2013, 01:04 PM   #127
ponce
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Pisa, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,097

Rep: Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
So, basically you are implying that GKH:

1) does not have enough time to do skating, snowboarding and being with the family (rather specific things, so I was assuming you know him)
2) would rather be skating, snowboarding and being with the family than working on the LTS kernel (would also require knowing him)
not at all.
I've not implied anything of that, you are reading between the lines something I've never written or thought of and you are putting words in my mouth that I never told: please stop.
BTW, you can read about him here.
Quote:
Personally, I hope he does exactly what he wants to do, and has no pressure from me or anyone to do or not to do what he wants.
I'm hoping too that he will do what he wants to do.

actually I don't think I can pressure anyone to skate, snowboard or stay with his family, lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
Alright, but the comment bothered me, because I feel it detracts from the value of GKH's work
(beside the fact that I appreciate *A LOT* Greg's work -and also his musical tastes, BTW) sorry, but I really can't see how.

Last edited by ponce; 06-11-2013 at 02:16 PM.
 
Old 06-11-2013, 01:30 PM   #128
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroX View Post
Out of the box. But --buildpkg failed so I installed it straight away using the --force
Thanks, will give that a try. Nonetheless this card will be replaced ASAP.
 
Old 06-13-2013, 06:46 PM   #129
GazL
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 6,897

Rep: Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponce View Post
BTW, you can read about him here.
Interesting comment on Greg's google+ page on the latest release announcement:
Quote:
More stable kernel releases for you to play with:
3.0.82
3.4.49
3.9.6
something for everyone. Except you smart people, you all are running Linus's development tree, right? I thought so...
I'm not really sure how to take that as the result from my sarcasm detector is coming back as 'inconclusive'. It's been a common trend in Greg's public postings over the years that he finds the long-tail of kernels that remain in-use frustrating and he often encourages people to move to the more recent versions in his release announcements. Is he really suggesting that running from Linus' tree is the "smart" choice? The Release Candidates (especially the early ones) would to me seem to be far too risky and if you only track linus' official releases that means you're going 3 months at a time without security updates and other fixes (unless you identify and back-port them yourself). Or perhaps he's just saying that dumb people like me should be using the stable kernel. Unfortunately, I'm too dumb to figure out what he is saying.
 
Old 06-14-2013, 12:02 AM   #130
ponce
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Pisa, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,097

Rep: Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174
I think that it's a reshare of a Linux page gplus post: for what I understood those seem to be written by Linus himself, and seems he just likes to do smartass/funny announces

about security updates, I'm following -rcs since a while because I'm interested in the new namespaces features, and for what I have noticed on git, most of the fixes pushed in Greg's stable tree went also (sometimes before, sometimes after, but seemed to me a matter of days) in Linus' main one.

Last edited by ponce; 06-14-2013 at 04:00 AM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-14-2013, 04:15 AM   #131
GazL
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 6,897

Rep: Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018Reputation: 5018
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponce View Post
I think that it's a reshare of a Linux page gplus post: for what I understood those seem to be written by Linus himself, and seems he just likes to do smartass/funny announces
If that's the case, he also likes to refer to himself (or at least his git tree) in the 3rd person: "linus's tree", which is a little weird.

I'm not on g+ so I don't really know how these sort of pages work. Could the 'Linux' feed/page/userid (whatever it's called) possibly be shared between them?

... but on reflection I think you may be right. It does seem more his style.

Last edited by GazL; 06-14-2013 at 04:41 AM. Reason: Couple of typos and readded initial comment that ponce quoted.
 
Old 06-14-2013, 04:28 AM   #132
ponce
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Pisa, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,097

Rep: Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by GazL View Post
I'm not on g+ so I don't really know how these sort of pages work. Could the 'Linux' feed/page/userid (whatever it's called) possibly be shared between them?
Yes, it could be also, gplus pages can have multiple admins, maybe also some others besides Linus and Greg, really dunno for sure the author of that post: it just seemed to me a little weird too that Greg himself was resharing something he had written.
 
Old 06-14-2013, 07:40 AM   #133
hitest
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Void, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 7,342

Rep: Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746Reputation: 3746
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
Alright, but the comment bothered me, because I feel it detracts from the value of GKH's work, even tho it may have been said with good intentions.
I don't know, mate. I did not see anything negative in ponce's comment(it seems benign to me).
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-21-2013, 02:02 AM   #134
jtsn
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Posts: 922

Rep: Reputation: 480Reputation: 480Reputation: 480Reputation: 480Reputation: 480
I currently need four external kernel modules:
  • r8168.ko 8.036 and r8169.ko 6.017 from Realtek for their GbE NICs (in-kernel drivers are slow/broken since years and upstream doesn't care)
  • nvidia.ko for GPU support
  • vmmon for VMware Player

I made them work with Linux 3.8.13, but didn't try out 3.9 yet. Is the effort worth it or should I wait until -current moves to 3.10?
 
Old 06-21-2013, 05:00 AM   #135
willysr
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Jogja, Indonesia
Distribution: Slackware-Current
Posts: 4,661

Rep: Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784Reputation: 1784
I don't think -Current will move to 3.10 for Slackware 14.1
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
modversions.h and my sanity! stcinifeic Mandriva 1 05-28-2004 05:12 PM
samba sanity skywaterhulk Linux - Software 0 04-22-2004 08:13 PM
Question of sanity ch4s3r Linux - Newbie 3 02-29-2004 07:22 PM
I guess a simple backtracking problem spank Programming 15 08-27-2003 11:21 AM
in the name of a musicians sanity! leprechaun Linux - Newbie 3 02-17-2002 01:34 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration