Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You can see it here. There is very clearly a section titled "Why Debian should default to systemd". I suggest you start there. Slightly OT: Also keep in mind that a faster boot is not a goal. It is simply a side affect of other improvements. It's as if someone were to make a car that's more fuel efficient, scores better at safety tests, and rides smoother, and just happens to be faster...and people only say "But my car is already fast enough! Why do I need a faster car when mine is sufficiently quick?" |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"Systemd is moving strongly in the direction of configuration-less system (i.e. “empty /etc/”). So /etc/fstab might be empty on a system with a GPT partition table, with partitions mounted in appropriate places based on their type id. This means that the configuration of the common one-machine-one-disk setup becomes even simpler." This doesn't sound good to me? I like being able to configure a system...I think systemd has done itself a disservice by some of these assumptions |
Quote:
And even then, the systemd dependency situation is not at all how you make it out to be. Nor is the weldedness of any lids or whatever else you're trying to be cheeky about. Don't take my defense of systemd the wrong way. I don't really care about what happens in Slackware because I will learn to live with whatever it is (and I have faith in the team's processes). But the FUD/ignorance in these parts is pretty embarrassing; I expect more from a group of Slackware users. |
At first, it is systemd, not systemD, not SystemD. You may not like it, but at least spell it correctly.
Reading this and the other thread, I seriously think that we may need a "Your hatred on systemd here"-Megathread in the Slackware forum. What is up with all this? And why does it look like that the people most opposing systemd seem to be those that are the most uninformed about it? Is it too hard to read the systemd documentation and come up with the answers to questions like "Sure makes a person wonder why someone would reinvent the wheel then."? The reasons why systemd was/is developed are clearly pointed out. I just can say the same as previous posters have already and quote PV: Quote:
Just like fatalfrrog says: Quote:
|
|
Quote:
Mostly uninformed? Look I am going off what I have read up about systemd as well as the general consensus of how everybody feels about it. I also have read up about what it does, and what the person who created it intends to do with it which is push it to every single distro. Now I am not sure if you have been reading ReaperX7's responses, but it sure seems as though something unnecessary has been created to fill a need which does not exist. Many others believe this exact same thing (in the forum as well as in other forums in general). What I am amazed about is that a Moderator out of everyone on the forum could be showing aggression such as this. I believe I have every right to talk about systemd if I want to. I have not seen anything written anywhere in this forum banning certain topics of threads (unless you could point me toward them or create them for me.). I also have said nothing about the developer. If I would have known that this thread would have caused such an uproar I would have never have created it. Better yet... why dont you just close it instead of letting it continue? You are a moderator for a reason right? Requesting a close for this thread. Marked it as solved. Waiting for close. |
Quote:
Quote:
I say we close this troll hole. |
Quote:
Thanks for your contribution. |
People, please relax. This is like a bad episode of Trek TOS. The whole crew is going mad from mods on the bridge right down to us red shirts. It's not your fault, it's just a subspace anomaly. Let's all go orbit some other planet until we feel better.
On the upside, 14.1 must be in damn good shape if there's only this shit to worry about. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 PM. |