LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-17-2005, 04:16 AM   #16
win32sux
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380

Quote:
Originally posted by Jaxån
As long as I gave an answer to the question, it should read "Fine". If you put RTFM in your "answer", it should prob. be read as the other interpretation.

RTFM can be interpretated in may ways. Both "Read The Fine Manual" and "Read The F*cking Manual", and both are right answer. That is the answer is in the manual. The most important things you could learn, is where you self can look up the information. But sometimes you can't figure it out, or find it. That's when to ask.
dude, RTFM manual stands for READ THE F*CKING MANUAL - PERIOD... the "F" doesn't stand for "fine" or "fantastic" or "friendly" or "familiar" or "fabulous" or "fancy" or none of that, you don't get to invent your own meaning for the "F" and then expect everyone to somehow magically "know" which meaning you've given the "F" when you bust-out a RTFM on a thread...

terms like "fine/friendly" are used when giving the acronym's definition: it's done that way so people can figure out the letter "F" without needing the ACTUAL "F word" spelled-out for them in the slang dictionary or wherever you got your "fine" idea...

the acronym doesn't change "as long as you gave an answer to the question" or anything like that... please don't use terms like RTFM unless your objective is in fact to be rude... this ain't slashdot, okay?? thanks...


Last edited by win32sux; 05-17-2005 at 04:29 AM.
 
Old 05-17-2005, 04:28 AM   #17
freakyg
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Distribution: LFS 5.0 and 6.1
Posts: 705

Rep: Reputation: 30
Code:
/dev/hda1   /windows   vfat        defaults,owner,users,rw  0   0
you might try this also.......works fine for my LFS and Slackware partitions...........
 
Old 05-17-2005, 05:24 AM   #18
wpyh
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Beijing
Distribution: Slackware 9.1 but FUBAR with packages I compile myself, and OpenBSD (not exactly a distro) on QEMU
Posts: 153

Rep: Reputation: 35
Funny debate about RTFM...

It works with and without "defaults". After looking at the man page, well, "defaults" seem to be a bit dangerous... But it doesn't work without umask=0.

As for the directory/files executable bit, you can look up the man page.
 
Old 05-17-2005, 06:40 AM   #19
win32sux
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380
Quote:
Originally posted by small_boy22
Is it possible to mount a FAT32 partition and have only the DIRECTORIES to have the execution allowed???
Because when i mount my fat32 partiotion i get everything inside to be executable !!!!!!!!that's bad...
i think you can do it if you specify a dmask and adjust your umask accordingly:
Quote:
umask=value
Set the umask (the bitmask of the permissions that
are not present). The default is the umask of the
current process. The value is given in octal.

dmask=value
Set the umask applied to directories only. The
default is the umask of the current process. The
value is given in octal.

fmask=value
Set the umask applied to regular files only. The
default is the umask of the current process. The
value is given in octal.

Last edited by win32sux; 05-17-2005 at 07:07 AM.
 
Old 05-17-2005, 04:53 PM   #20
Jaxån
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 142

Rep: Reputation: 15
win32sux: Oh, you did a RTFM, how nice .
If you then tell where you get the information, everyone will actually learn something usefull for later use. Nice...
As I wrote earlier, to teach (inform, enlight, whatever) newbies where to look for information is the best you can do to help. Could even be better than givning the answer. But if you don't want to be rude, you should also give an answer.
And the it's was you who interpreted my answer as rude. I think you can give a polite answer with an RTFM in it. And you could be really rude without using RTFM. It's all in the readers eye (and mind, like where beauty is).

And english isn't my first language.

End of Story, I unsubscribe this thread.
 
Old 05-18-2005, 01:05 PM   #21
win32sux
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380
anyways, i'd like to point-out to anyone reading this that there's actually THREE separate issues on this thread... i'm posting them again in the hope that it will help get everyone's issues resolved, as right now there's still no confirmation that any of the issues have been resolved even though there have been several replies for all the issues...

the first issue is (obviously) the first post of the thread - the OP hasn't posted again (yet)...

it's the vfat issue:
Quote:
Originally posted by aje
I have two vfat partitions that are shared between slackware and windows. I can access the drives and contents on them fine as root, but not as user. My fstab line for the drives read as follows:

Code:
/dev/hda1        /windows         vfat        defaults,umask=000        0   0
How must I modify this line to access the drive as a user?
the second issue is ntfs-related, posted by wpyh here:
Quote:
Originally posted by wpyh
This is a bit off-topic, but I had to use umask=000 in fstab or I won't be able to access my ntfs partition. Is that ok? I've disabled ntfs write support in the kernel, btw.
the third issue is small_boy22's question regarding directories on vfat:
Quote:
Originally posted by small_boy22
Is it possible to mount a FAT32 partition and have only the DIRECTORIES to have the execution allowed???
Because when i mount my fat32 partiotion i get everything inside to be executable !!!!!!!!that's bad...
IMHO it would be a good idea if we could specify which of the posters (aje, wpyh, and small_boy22) we are addressing when we contribute our two cents on the thread... this way we can have better organization and we will have a better chance of finding solutions to all three issues (in case they haven't already been found)...

oh, and BTW: aje, wpyh, and small_boy22 please don't forget to confirm that your issues have been resolved (and which method resolved them) if that's the case...

just my ...


Last edited by win32sux; 05-19-2005 at 01:41 AM.
 
Old 05-22-2005, 12:34 PM   #22
wpyh
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Beijing
Distribution: Slackware 9.1 but FUBAR with packages I compile myself, and OpenBSD (not exactly a distro) on QEMU
Posts: 153

Rep: Reputation: 35
It seems to be resolved:
/dev/hda3 /mnt/hda3 ntfs ro,noauto,user,umask=0 0 0
thanks
 
Old 05-22-2005, 08:43 PM   #23
aje
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Internet
Distribution: Slackware 10.1
Posts: 177

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Sorry I hadn't come back to post whether or not a solution worked. I did a reboot and my fstab was working fine ... Is it normal to need to reboot to sort of "refresh" fstab information? My fstab line for the drive(s) now read:

Code:
/dev/hda1        /windows         vfat        defaults,umask=000        0   0
/dev/hdb1        /media           vfat        auto,rw,umask=000        1   0
 
Old 05-22-2005, 08:53 PM   #24
slackMeUp
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Slack-where?
Posts: 654

Rep: Reputation: 30
LOL...

You never remounted the partitions did you?

After making a change in fstab that is?

hehe... I bet not.

 
Old 05-22-2005, 10:09 PM   #25
win32sux
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380
Quote:
Originally posted by aje
Sorry I hadn't come back to post whether or not a solution worked. I did a reboot and my fstab was working fine ... Is it normal to need to reboot to sort of "refresh" fstab information? My fstab line for the drive(s) now read:

Code:
/dev/hda1        /windows         vfat        defaults,umask=000        0   0
/dev/hdb1        /media           vfat        auto,rw,umask=000        1   0
you wouldn't necessarily need to reboot (although that would work), you'd just need to remount the partitions... in your case:
Code:
umount /windows
umount /media
mount /windows
mount /media
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SAMBA - VFAT local mount for all user write access... dolvmin Linux - Software 13 12-21-2006 03:50 PM
9.3 finally OK (inc user access to USB drives) had corrupted / bad CD's 1kyle SUSE / openSUSE 0 08-30-2005 03:09 AM
automount vfat partition with rw access for any user Simon Bridge Red Hat 12 05-26-2005 08:37 AM
vfat drives and garnome tfdml37 Linux - Software 5 02-28-2004 01:11 PM
cant access mounted drives when logged in as a user Shantesh Linux - General 1 12-25-2003 08:07 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration