SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Well I bought this EVGA'sbabe (newegg's reference and more pics) like 2 weeks ago. Works flawlessly
I'm using the latest 8774 nVidia Drivers, I was using this beta driver but I was getting oversized fonts on KDE (anyone knows why?)
The card had bundled a game, Hitman: Blood Money. Really nice as I wasn't expecting it. I liked the game I had only played Hitman II before.
Latest games I have run on Slackware 11.0, all of them at 1280x1024 as that is my monitor's limit (I need a bigger one)
-- UT2004 maxed out, damn smooth game even that it's supposed to be not so new
-- Doom3 High Quality FSAA 4x, Aniso 8x
-- Quake4 the very same as Doom3
Presently, I find the new slack 11 much better for games, as I kind of figured it would with the xorg upgrade.
However, I've had a few screen melt's on exiting KDE just to go to run level 3 that I use as default, I don't use the KDE or any graphical log-on screen. There are times that I drop down to cli and I have absolutely nothing on screen but black. Hitting control+Alt+f6 get's me to a prompt, well usually. Sometimes, I have to hit ctrl+alt+del.
I get this spammed about 500 lines or so in my /var/log/xorg.0.log alot:
Quote:
(II) Loading extension ATIFGLRXDRI
(II) fglrx(0): doing DRIScreenInit
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is 10, (OK)
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is 10, (OK)
drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID PCI:3:0:0
I've had the graphics driver reset itself 2x while playing Unreal Tournament 2004, I did not lose the connection to the game server, or lose the game tho Thank god, I was winning too.
I'm not sure, but I may try out what Mr. Pat V describes in the "Changes & Hints.txt" file:
Quote:
* If you have an ati radeon card and are experiencing problems with
it locking up, there is a patched set of ati modules at
/extra/x11-radeon-patched/ - if you are not experiencing problems, then
don't install this, as it does tend to cause problems if you weren't
already having them...
I'm not locking up, but I am having video failures.
I'm using the latest ATI drivers.
I would say that for the first page of this thread, for section ATI to definitely clarify that it's for Slackware 10.2 only.
For slack 11.0 you still need the fstab entry, and you now need to download the 32bit installer file: "ati-driver-installer-8.29.6.run" whereas before we only used the "fglrx_6_8_0-8.29.6-1.i386.rpm"
Another important note about ATI is the 'glxgears' now really shows no good method of predicting how good drivers are for us anymore.
Added the "Slackware 10.2 only." disclaimer on first post.
Looks like I'll have to revisit everything for 11... Whenever it gets done downloading the DVD image, I'll do a fresh install on my Intel box, then my Nvidia one, then I'll pull the Nvidia card out, enable the SIS chip, and try that, too.
Results will be added/posted as soon as I can get them here.
Last edited by cwwilson721; 10-12-2006 at 02:15 PM.
Great thread... My first ATI experience (toshiba notebook): I put all kernel drm stuff as modules, installed the ati drivers, put the tmpfs line in my fstab and it all worked fine.
Great thread... My first ATI experience (toshiba notebook): I put all kernel drm stuff as modules, installed the ati drivers, put the tmpfs line in my fstab and it all worked fine.
Many thanks.
Thanks for the kudos.
What Distro are you using? If Slackware, which version?
Has anybody used the info here for a distro other than Slackware?
I want to see if this info helps other distros too, and if most of the info also works in Slackware 11... I'm still downloading it...8+ hours to go...
....Has anybody used the info here for a distro other than Slackware?....
Some time ago, I got nVidia cards working on a couple of Suse 10.1 installations, I wanted to try the XGL stuff.
Though this was done on the Slackware way, pretty straightforward, and I think this "method" should work on any distro. I didn't want to mess up with yast-like wizards or such:
-- I downloaded the driver from the nvidia site
-- Shut down X server
-- Executed the file, and let it make its magic for some seconds
-- Tweak the xorg.conf file a little (SuSE had some modelines that made the screen flicker a lot in any resolution, just commented them out, were not needed at all)
-- startx again and that's it.
Though that's my unique experience with other distros besides Slackware. I don't have the time nor the patience to make them work like Slackware does in the first install. I think you all slackers shall understand me
I could work fine on Suse10.1 and XGL enabled around 2 weeks but then I had to come back to Slackware when yast decided to upgrade KDE, failed outright and left me without my konsole (no one takes my konsole away ya hear me!?). I erased SuSE's partition the same day.
Yup! just did a fresh install of Slack 11.... I bought the dvd but the laptop wouldn't read it!! haha! so I had to download disk 1! Now looking at lovely xfce desktop mmmm. Thanks again.
Location: Northeastern Michigan, where Carhartt is a Designer Label
Distribution: Slackware 32- & 64-bit Stable
Posts: 3,541
Rep:
I'm running Slackware 11.0, kernel 2.6.18, and have installed ATI's proprietary drivers using ati-driver-installer-8.29.6.run, and, pretty much, things work like I'd hoped. The card is a Radeon X300 series and my tube is a Samsung SyncMaster 955DF (all of which was automagicially detected and written to xorg.conf. I added
Section "DRI"
Mode 0666
EndSection
to xorg.conf and
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
to /etc/fstab.
glxinfo reports direct rendering: Yes.
So far, so good.
The tube is supposed to be capable of 1600x1200 (Smasung says this is the max), 1280x1024, and so on down to butt-ugly. It's looking like the ATI driver will not support 1600x1200, but it defaults to 1792x1344, followed by 1280x1024 and so on. Problem is, the tube starts and displays 1792x1344 but it's offset to the left -- I can correct that with the controls and get the display centered but that ain't gonna work so hot when I boot (shudder) XP on the rare occasion I need to (shudder). This isn't a Big Deal, but I like resolution at 1600x1200 where 1280x1024 looks gunky and I'm wondering if there's some (convenient) way to "fix" that; so far no luck with the documentation.
I did try adding
Modes "1600x1200" "1280x1024"
in the "Screen" section added to xorg.conf and got 1280x1024 (for what that's worth).
Anyway, thanks to others with helpful hints about direct rendering and ATI's proprietary drivers -- this turned out to be simpler than I'd ever have thought.
Any hints about this would be appreciated.
Oh, yeah, the ati-driver-installer-8.29.6.run, file just installs.
fglrxinfo displays:
display: :0.0 screen: 0
OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: RADEON X300/X550 Series Generic
OpenGL version string: 2.0.6065 (8.29.6)
And fgl_glxgears reports:
Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer
875 frames in 5.0 seconds = 175.000 FPS
1054 frames in 5.0 seconds = 210.800 FPS
1050 frames in 5.0 seconds = 210.000 FPS
I'm running Slackware 11.0, kernel 2.6.18, and have installed ATI's proprietary drivers using ati-driver-installer-8.29.6.run, and, pretty much, things work like I'd hoped. The card is a Radeon X300 series and my tube is a Samsung SyncMaster 955DF (all of which was automagicially detected and written to xorg.conf. I added
Section "DRI"
Mode 0666
EndSection
to xorg.conf and
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
to /etc/fstab.
glxinfo reports direct rendering: Yes.
So far, so good.
The tube is supposed to be capable of 1600x1200 (Smasung says this is the max), 1280x1024, and so on down to butt-ugly. It's looking like the ATI driver will not support 1600x1200, but it defaults to 1792x1344, followed by 1280x1024 and so on. Problem is, the tube starts and displays 1792x1344 but it's offset to the left -- I can correct that with the controls and get the display centered but that ain't gonna work so hot when I boot (shudder) XP on the rare occasion I need to (shudder). This isn't a Big Deal, but I like resolution at 1600x1200 where 1280x1024 looks gunky and I'm wondering if there's some (convenient) way to "fix" that; so far no luck with the documentation.
I did try adding
Modes "1600x1200" "1280x1024"
in the "Screen" section added to xorg.conf and got 1280x1024 (for what that's worth).
Anyway, thanks to others with helpful hints about direct rendering and ATI's proprietary drivers -- this turned out to be simpler than I'd ever have thought.
Any hints about this would be appreciated.
Oh, yeah, the ati-driver-installer-8.29.6.run, file just installs.
fglrxinfo displays:
display: :0.0 screen: 0
OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: RADEON X300/X550 Series Generic
OpenGL version string: 2.0.6065 (8.29.6)
And fgl_glxgears reports:
Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer
875 frames in 5.0 seconds = 175.000 FPS
1054 frames in 5.0 seconds = 210.800 FPS
1050 frames in 5.0 seconds = 210.000 FPS
Might take a little bit to add this post in. The post is getting a little long...lol
Location: Northeastern Michigan, where Carhartt is a Designer Label
Distribution: Slackware 32- & 64-bit Stable
Posts: 3,541
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tronayne
The tube is supposed to be capable of 1600x1200 (Smasung says this is the max), 1280x1024, and so on down to butt-ugly. It's looking like the ATI driver will not support 1600x1200, but it defaults to 1792x1344, followed by 1280x1024 and so on.
I figured it out.
The aticonfig utility (sort of equivalent to xorgconfig) makes a back up of the existing /etc/X11/xorg.conf file then adds entries to xorg.conf for the ATI drivers.
What it does not do (apparently) is query the display (as xorgconfig does) and set the ModelName,HorizSync and VertRefresh values in the ATI Monitor section of xorg.conf; I believe (could be wrong) that without those variables set the driver dynamically drives the display to its maximum capability and I needed to tone it down a little.
So, I got the specifications for my display and added them to the ATI Monitor section like this:
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.