SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I can recommend TightVNC, it works on Linux and Windows x86 and it should be possible to make it work on Mac OS X x86 too. I've got it working on little-endian MIPS too but it doesn't work on big-endian architectures such as SPARC.
Be sure to use 32-bit binaries because the 64-bit ones have crash bugs. Because of these two issues I'm thinking of porting TightVNC to modular Xorg.
I can recommend TightVNC, it works on Linux and Windows x86 and it should be possible to make it work on Mac OS X x86 too. I've got it working on little-endian MIPS too but it doesn't work on big-endian architectures such as SPARC.
Be sure to use 32-bit binaries because the 64-bit ones have crash bugs. Because of these two issues I'm thinking of porting TightVNC to modular Xorg.
I know of NX and that it's even much faster and lighter. But ever since I started porting Slackware to MIPS and SPARC, I've become much more conscious of architecture-dependent software in general and binaries in particular.
I'll try to build the sources that are available and see if I can get those working across all three architectures. If that doesn't work out I'll try the official binaries on x86 and let you know how well those work.
I know of NX and that it's even much faster and lighter. But ever since I started porting Slackware to MIPS and SPARC, I've become much more conscious of architecture-dependent software in general and binaries in particular.
I'll try to build the sources that are available and see if I can get those working across all three architectures. If that doesn't work out I'll try the official binaries on x86 and let you know how well those work.
I've tried FreeNX and boy oh boy is it great!
I don't think I can ever go back to VNC again. Using NX is almost like sitting at the computer, even though it's connected using a standard ADSL connection. It's amazing!
And it comes with clients for Linux, OSX and Windows.
So did you install it yourself or did you just try a live CD such as Knoppix?
I'm thinking of building (Free)NX packages, because I know how great it is (not actually having tried it yet). But it would be nice if NoMachine wasn't so focused on a few architectures, even though they depend on the support revenue that they generate that way. I'll try to contact them to see what the possibilities are for official Linux support on non-x86 architectures.
I know from experience that NoMachine is not cooperative when it comes to supporting non-X86 architectures... when we were teaming with the dutch reseller of NX technology some time ago, it would have given us a big advantage over our competition when we could offer x86_64 builds of NX binaries but even that proved impossible...
So did you install it yourself or did you just try a live CD such as Knoppix?
I'm thinking of building (Free)NX packages, because I know how great it is (not actually having tried it yet). But it would be nice if NoMachine wasn't so focused on a few architectures, even though they depend on the support revenue that they generate that way. I'll try to contact them to see what the possibilities are for official Linux support on non-x86 architectures.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.