LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-27-2004, 03:23 PM   #1
tigerflag
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Distribution: PCLinuxOS 2012.08
Posts: 430

Rep: Reputation: 30
3 Q's about version 10


I'm waiting for my Slack subscription to arrive. I'm on dialup, so if a lot of stuff is broken I won't be able to download big programs like KDE to fix it.

1. Has anybody successfully changed the screen resolution to 1280x1024 after installing? Some people are having font rendering problems and it "might" be related to a default 1024x768 resolution. They can't seem to set it any higher. I know my fonts look like c**p at 1024x768, and if that's the best I'll be able to achieve, I won't try the new v.10...

2. Is the Alsa version that comes in the default installation compatible with the 2.4.26 kernel? If I try the 2.6 kernel, will I need to download a different Alsa package?

3. I have a / partition on /hda, and a separate /home partition for users on /hdb. Will /home be rendered useless when I upgrade from KDE 3.1.4 to the new 3.2.* version? I've heard of people having to delete their .kde config file and losing all their data. I can't afford to do that...

I'd appreciate hearing from people about these things. Thanks!

Siri Amrit
 
Old 06-27-2004, 03:28 PM   #2
miqorz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Slackware Current
Posts: 12

Rep: Reputation: 0
I'm using a resolution of 1400x1050 and my fonts look great..

Also ALSA works fine here.. so.. hope that helps.
 
Old 06-27-2004, 03:30 PM   #3
tigerflag
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Distribution: PCLinuxOS 2012.08
Posts: 430

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
What kernel are you using?
 
Old 06-27-2004, 03:31 PM   #4
miqorz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Slackware Current
Posts: 12

Rep: Reputation: 0
2.6.7
 
Old 06-27-2004, 03:32 PM   #5
tigerflag
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Distribution: PCLinuxOS 2012.08
Posts: 430

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Gawd, that was fast! Thanks!
 
Old 06-27-2004, 03:55 PM   #6
AxelFendersson
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Darkest Oxfordshire
Distribution: Arch, Slackware
Posts: 184

Rep: Reputation: 32
Re: 3 Q's about version 10

Quote:
Quoth tigerflag:
1. Has anybody successfully changed the screen resolution to 1280x1024 after installing? Some people are having font rendering problems and it "might" be related to a default 1024x768 resolution. They can't seem to set it any higher. I know my fonts look like c**p at 1024x768, and if that's the best I'll be able to achieve, I won't try the new v.10...
I'm running in 1152x864 and my fonts look fine.

Quote:
tigerflag also asked:
2. Is the Alsa version that comes in the default installation compatible with the 2.4.26 kernel?
Yep. 2.4.26 is the default kernel in Slack 10, and the default ALSA package is compiled for it. It works fine for me.

Quote:
tigerflag also asked:
If I try the 2.6 kernel, will I need to download a different Alsa package?
Yes. It's in /testing/packages/linux-2.6.7 , along with the 2.6.7 kernel itself, and the appropriate modules and headers.

Last edited by AxelFendersson; 06-27-2004 at 03:57 PM.
 
Old 06-27-2004, 04:00 PM   #7
rotvogel
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 534

Rep: Reputation: 30
My screen resolution is 1280*1024 and my fonts are okay. Even alsa is working for me using a 2.6.7 kernel and a Soundblaster live value. I didn't download any alsa package.
 
Old 06-27-2004, 04:46 PM   #8
tigerflag
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Distribution: PCLinuxOS 2012.08
Posts: 430

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thanks, y'all. Now, can you tell me if you tried upgrading KDE for an existing /home partition?
 
Old 06-27-2004, 05:46 PM   #9
gargamel
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Distribution: Slackware, OpenSuSE
Posts: 1,839

Rep: Reputation: 242Reputation: 242Reputation: 242
Hi!

1. I have 1280x1024 after running xorgconfig. Default is 1024x768 as this is the maximum for frame buffer. Which is used as it is generic, meaning that it works just on just about every hardware you might think of. Frame buffer is the default in many Linuces, nowadays, because it gives you a desktop on just about any system, without having to go through the X config process. If you want good performance, higher resolutions, or 3D, you'll have to replace the frame buffer based default X configuration with a specific configuration for your hardware.

2. Default kernel is 2.4.26. It comes with ALSA libs and modules. In /testing there is kernel 2.6.7, also with pre-compiled ALSA binaries. The first one works great on my old P120 classic laptop, with the latter I experienced a couple of problems due to the fact that I have onboard sound and a PCI soundcard, as well, in my desktop system. With onboard sound it works mostly ok, while configuration for the soundcard go lost when there is no sound for a few minutes. ALSA then switches to onboard sound and forgets about the configuration of the soundcard, it seems. No big problem, as I now just use onboard sound, but definitely a bug. Kernel 2.6.7 is accompanied by pre-compiled ALSA binaries in /testing. No need to download anything.

3. KDE upgrade. In fact it can go wrong when there are conflicts between new and old configuration files. Identify what config files you need from .kde and other hidden directories. Candidates for backup certainly are .kde/share/config. But I think that configuration can easily be redone in KDE. More important, IMO, are the data in apps. KOrganizer saves your appointments there, and you don't want to miss a date, do you? ;-)
I'd rename .kde to something like .kde_sav, look for other files and dirs (visible or hidden), then do the upgrade, and finally restore config and app data from .kde_sav.

Have fun!

gargamel
 
Old 06-27-2004, 07:07 PM   #10
Shade
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Burke, VA
Distribution: RHEL, Slackware, Ubuntu, Fedora
Posts: 1,418
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 46
You should save your current xorg.conf or XF86Config file and it'll work exactly the same as before.

Hosing your .kde directory will only cost you most of your kde preferences, rather than any actual data -- apart from say your appointments, noted above.

Alsa works great for me, but I rolled my own 2.6.7

--Shade
 
Old 06-27-2004, 07:14 PM   #11
tigerflag
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Distribution: PCLinuxOS 2012.08
Posts: 430

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
thanks, gargamel (again).
I'll try to backup everything I can.

Shade wrote:
" Hosing your .kde directory will only cost you most of your kde preferences, rather than any actual data -- apart from say your appointments, noted above."

Would I lose bookmarks, address book, etc? Settings are easy enough to put back, but I have a TON of bookmarks and not exactly sure where they are to save them.
 
Old 06-27-2004, 07:34 PM   #12
Shade
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Burke, VA
Distribution: RHEL, Slackware, Ubuntu, Fedora
Posts: 1,418
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 46
Your bookmarks are kept in .kde/share/apps/konqueror/bookmarks.xml


--Shade
 
Old 06-27-2004, 07:57 PM   #13
Mephisto
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Washington D.C, USA
Distribution: Slack 12, Etch, Gutsy
Posts: 453

Rep: Reputation: 31
Why do you need to upgrade Alsa? I don't doubt you but I did a fresh install fo Slack 10 last night and immediately upgraded to 2.6.7 from Kernel.org. Sound is working fine without any further updates.
 
Old 06-27-2004, 08:55 PM   #14
Toth
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 83

Rep: Reputation: 15
ALSA is included in the 2.6 kernel tree. When configuring the kernel, you'll be able to compile in (optionally as modules) ALSA support for your sound card. In 2.4 this had to be done by compiling modules not in the 2.4 kernel tree.

If you install the generic 2.6.7 kernel in /testing, you'll have to use the alsa-driver package in the same directory because Pat separated the ALSA modules from the other modules for whatever reason.

If you compile the 2.6 kernel from the source at kernel.org though, just select the right options during compile time and you don't need to worry about any alsa-driver package.
 
Old 06-27-2004, 09:13 PM   #15
tigerflag
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Distribution: PCLinuxOS 2012.08
Posts: 430

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Thank you. This is most helpful.

Siri Amrit
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Regarding distribution + kernel version + gcc version + glib version. JCipriani Linux - General 8 04-19-2008 02:54 PM
Just some Q's klunk Linux - Newbie 4 02-13-2005 11:40 PM
New here and got some Q's chivas Linux - Newbie 8 03-19-2004 11:36 AM
a couple Q's.... adam_boz *BSD 1 12-06-2002 12:33 PM
Smoothwall Q's LinuxDude Linux - General 4 08-31-2002 04:43 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration