LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Slackware (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/)
-   -   10.0, still stable or just forgotten (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/10-0-still-stable-or-just-forgotten-275139/)

trigggl 01-07-2005 04:38 PM

10.0, still stable or just forgotten
 
I'm glad Patrick is feeling better, but all his energy is being directed toward "current" and getting the next version out. Is 10.0 still stable? I feel like I'm on a solid block of ice that's drifting out to sea. Is it time to start upgrading to some of the current files? Should I wait for 10.1 to come out and upgrade to those files? Should I just save all my settings in the home directory and do a complete reinstall?

This is the first time Slackware has been my main distro when it was about to come out with a new version. Mandrake was my main distro previously. I tried Slack 9.1 briefly, but couldn't get dvd's to play quite fast enough. I figured that out and now Slackware 10.0 is my only distro.

It just feels really weird to see all these updates for current and nothing for 10.0. I get the feeling they just don't have time to keep up with them and that the 10.1 is the priority.

trey85stang 01-07-2005 04:45 PM

Re: 10.0, still stable or just forgotten
 
Quote:

Originally posted by trigggl
I'm glad Patrick is feeling better, but all his energy is being directed toward "current" and getting the next version out. Is 10.0 still stable? I feel like I'm on a solid block of ice that's drifting out to sea. Is it time to start upgrading to some of the current files? Should I wait for 10.1 to come out and upgrade to those files? Should I just save all my settings in the home directory and do a complete reinstall?

This is the first time Slackware has been my main distro when it was about to come out with a new version. Mandrake was my main distro previously. I tried Slack 9.1 briefly, but couldn't get dvd's to play quite fast enough. I figured that out and now Slackware 10.0 is my only distro.

It just feels really weird to see all these updates for current and nothing for 10.0. I get the feeling they just don't have time to keep up with them and that the 10.1 is the priority.

Slackware 10 is known to work.. I have never been a fan of current. I dabbled with it a bit when i first started using slackware.. but I have determined that th emost stable slackware setup is the default setup that 9.1 or 10 offers.

AxelFendersson 01-07-2005 07:19 PM

Re: Re: 10.0, still stable or just forgotten
 
Quote:

From the slackware-current changelog:
Tue Dec 21 19:07:25 PST 2004
More to come, including fixes in -stable. Still catching up...

What with illness, and then Christmas, I imagine things have been a bit busy lately. Presumably we'll be seeing a few patches for 10.0 soon.

On the other hand, I gather 10.1 isn't all that far away either.

reddazz 01-07-2005 07:32 PM

Slackware current is usually quite stable, because even though it includes bleeding edge packages, they are usually well tested, but some problems can happen. I think Slack 10.1 is due out soon, coz remember when Patrick was taken ill, preorders of Slack 10.1 were being taken at the Slackware online store.

trigggl 01-07-2005 11:16 PM

I suppose I'll just wait for the next release and then follow the instructions for upgrade at the Slackware site.

I guess I was just wondering if anyone had heard anything.

masand 01-08-2005 02:28 AM

hey i am going to download slackware ISOs today

so should i wait for 10.1 or should i go about downloading them

i haven't tried slackware yet and i have heard that it is awesome so i want to try it soon!

also do the 2 installation DISCs have the 2.6.7 kernel along with 2.4?? or are they in the other 2 source CDs

regards

cathectic 01-08-2005 02:39 AM

Quote:

so should i wait for 10.1 or should i go about downloading them
Get them now. No one except Pat knows when 10.1 will be released.

Quote:

also do the 2 installation DISCs have the 2.6.7 kernel along with 2.4
The 2.6.7 kernel is in the 'testing' folder on one of the first two discs (can't remember which one). You have to install Slackware 10 with a 2.4 kernel, then afterwards follow the instructions in testing/linux2.6.7/README.initrd to install it.

masand 01-08-2005 02:53 AM

thanx!!

tonight i will be downloading Slack
also how is slack different from slack-current
is that ,we should first get the slackware 10.0 then we can go about updating our packages??

regards

carboncopy 01-08-2005 04:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by masand
thanx!!

tonight i will be downloading Slack
also how is slack different from slack-current
is that ,we should first get the slackware 10.0 then we can go about updating our packages?

That is correct.

carboncopy 01-08-2005 04:18 AM

In addition.. I find Slackware a really good learning *nix. It adds to my versatility in meddling other distro, *BSD and Mac Os X as well.

masand 01-08-2005 05:15 AM

thank u all for ur prompt replies!!
i really cannot wait to lay my hands on those slackware CDs

regards

dhave 01-08-2005 07:31 AM

Re: 10.0, still stable or just forgotten
 
Quote:

Originally posted by trigggl
It just feels really weird to see all these updates for current and nothing for 10.0. I get the feeling they just don't have time to keep up with them and that the 10.1 is the priority.
trigggl,

I've found that Slack Current is perfectly stable. I had more problems when I used to use Fedora with daily updates.

It's not hard to go from Slack 10 to Current and then keep it current. I do it manually, reading over the changelogs when new stuff appears and selecting what I want to update. I've learned a lot about my system this way, and I feel that I'm getting the most out of Slackware and benefitting maximally from Patrick's considerable expertise.

eelriver 01-08-2005 02:40 PM

Pat only issues security patches for the last numbered release when a program is found to be vulnerable and a fix is avalible. I don't think he's been neglecting 10.0, there just hasen't been a need lately. He doesn't upgrade just because there's a new version, that's what -current is for.

ringwraith 01-08-2005 02:49 PM

eelriver, where did you get that from. If you look at the changelogs he is still doing security patches on 8.1 and newer. All of them are probably a bit behind right now due to reasons we are all aware of. Here are excerpts to show that 8.1 has the same as 10.0.

ftp://ftp.slackware.at/slackware-8.1/ChangeLog.txt
Sun Oct 31 17:54:02 PST 2004
patches/packages/apache-1.3.33-i386-1.tgz

ftp://ftp.slackware.at/slackware-10.0/ChangeLog.txt
patches/packages/apache-1.3.33-i486-1.tgz

eelriver 01-08-2005 03:45 PM

I mistyped when I said last numbered release, my intention was that he only issues security patches, not version upgrades for the numbered, ie. 10.0, releases.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 AM.