LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-15-2004, 01:12 PM   #1
stan03
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 26

Rep: Reputation: 15
Suse or Mandrake?


*points to topic*

which one in your opinion is better and why? im a complete noob, so keep that in mind.
 
Old 02-15-2004, 01:33 PM   #2
Vigge
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Sweden
Distribution: SuSE 8.1+, RH 6+, Gentoo 1.4, MDK8+
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Depends, as always on you. I have used them both extensivly and I would go with SuSE anyday of the week.
 
Old 02-15-2004, 01:40 PM   #3
wslyhbb
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Distribution: Mandriva 2009.0 PowerPack x86_64
Posts: 150

Rep: Reputation: 15
Definitely Mandrake!
I love Mandrake 9.2, it is much easier to use. Mandrake has a thing called MandrakeUpdate that is sort of like WindowsUpdate to keep your distribution up to date. Mandrake is aslo very easy to install. Suse has a pretty good install too, it is different but Yast2 is nice. The thing I have against Suse is the lack of providing ISOs. When I got into Linux, I tried a bunch of different distributions (Suse, Lycoris, Caldera, and eventually Mandrake). Since I was starting out and just wanted to try a few different distros to see which one I liked best, I wanted to download it and install it rather than buy it. Suse allows you to install via FTP, just like the other distros, but then if you want to install it on many computers you have to go through that over and over again. Whereas if I had the ISO I could just use the CDs. I tried their LiveEval, which is an ISO. I never did actually perform the real install. I hope now that Novell owns Suse they will provide these ISOs soon. Suse is well known in the server industry, and is #2 of all the Linux distros. I like Novell, their purchase of Suse, their relationship with IBM, and the way they have handled the lawsuit filed by SCO (of which I hate).
 
Old 02-15-2004, 01:47 PM   #4
stan03
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 26

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
lol, i hate it when i get two conflicting answers i guess ill have to wait
 
Old 02-15-2004, 01:49 PM   #5
Spudley
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Berkshire, England.
Distribution: SuSE 10.0
Posts: 299

Rep: Reputation: 32
I'm using SuSE. But the main reason for that is because Mandrake refused to install on my machine.

When I first started, I tried a number of the distributions available at the time, and Mandrake was the only one I could get to grips with, so that was what I stuck for some time.... until I tried to install Mandrake 8, when it came out, and their new installer locked up on me.

So that's when I went to SuSE, and I've been with it ever since. But to be honest, I'd sooner be using Mandrake - I still like it better.
 
Old 02-15-2004, 01:52 PM   #6
DRHov99
Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Kennewick WA
Distribution: SuSE, Libranet,Debian,Mepis
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Exclamation

SuSE all the way. Mandrake 9.2 is the worst distro they have put out. It has caused more problems on more machines since it's inception then any other OS other then Windows.
 
Old 02-15-2004, 01:54 PM   #7
dustyd63
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Distribution: MDK 10.0
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
I'm also a newbie. Mandrake has been working out quite well for me on Microsoft's Virtual PC.
 
Old 02-15-2004, 02:01 PM   #8
davecs
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Barking, Essex, Britain
Distribution: PCLinuxOS and MX-Linux
Posts: 502

Rep: Reputation: 32
Ask 10 people and get 10 answers. It often depends on your hardware. I am using Gentoo but am the first to admit it is not easy for a newbie to install.

I used to use Mandrake (9.1) and I have to say that without it I would never have gained the knowledge to move onto Gentoo. Also as someone said, you can download CD-ROM image files (iso's) so have several goes at getting it right, as I did first time out.

I would try Mandrake Free Download Edition first, then you haven't committed too much if it doesn't work out for you...
 
Old 02-15-2004, 02:08 PM   #9
stan03
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 26

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
well i would rather just get the better distro rather than go through the trouble later. my friend has suse which i can borrow because he has moved on to gentoo, which is what i plan to do soon. thats why im asking about this
 
Old 02-15-2004, 02:23 PM   #10
LinuxSeeker
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Linuxland
Distribution: Ubuntu 5.10, KUbuntu 5.10, Mandrake 10.1 - Ubuntu 5.04 (Hoary)
Posts: 346

Rep: Reputation: 30
Mandrake 9.2, or, if you can wait a few months, Mandrake 10. I have tried both SuSe and Mandrake, I believe that Mandrake in far better than SuSe (any version), and more user friendly.
 
Old 02-15-2004, 02:26 PM   #11
stan03
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 26

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
can you give some examples please... thanks
 
Old 02-15-2004, 02:44 PM   #12
CanadianPenguin
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Distribution: Ubuntu "Hoary" - The best distro around by a long shot.
Posts: 116

Rep: Reputation: 15
I used Mandrake starting at about version 6.0. For my latest computer, I decided to go SuSE, and I like it much much better (I moved from Mandrake 8.2 to SuSE 8.2 so it should be a pretty fair comparison). I'm on SuSE 9.0 now, and it is great.
 
Old 02-15-2004, 02:46 PM   #13
no_leaf_clover
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Plymouth, UK
Distribution: MEPIS 2.4.3
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 0
I use SuSE 9.0 Pro on my desktop and Mandrake 9.2 on my laptop, I don't really see an advantage of using either, except the SuSE install program is nicer. The only reason I use Mandrake 9.2 is because it seems to be the only distro that works with my VIA graphics card on my laptop without crashing or giving me weird inexplicable graphics problems. Seeing as the packages you get to work on them are virtually the same it doesn't make a difference, I've seen a lot of sites that give Mandrake customised RPM's though, and less giving SuSE ones but maybe that's because of where I'm looking.
 
Old 02-15-2004, 03:18 PM   #14
oaksword
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Plymouth, UK
Distribution: Fedora 3 (DVD)
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: 0
I moved from suse to Mandrake

I like suse. But I like mandrake more. Suse indeed is a great distro. I have been working on suse 8.1 8.2, and some early editions(short time). SuSE has a nice face and great support tools e.g. YaST2. The best thing about SuSE, in my view of course, is the widely spreading. People can easily find packs for suse all over the Internet.
That, however, is the point I against Mandrake. You have to buy a set of cd/dvd or a membership, otherwise you will not get the specially packed software for Mandrake. Is that a big deal? Of course not, you can find any thing you need in many different forms. Download a source and build it.
I met Mandrake9.2 3 months ago, when download the iso from its site. It's the most profesional distro I have ever seen. (well I d't know how is suse 9 or RH9.2). You also have a whole bunch of tools to config your system, very easily.
Finally, I think the distro is only prepared for the new comming. Once you fall in love with Linux, you will want to build your own. At least I'm preparing to do so.
-oaksword
 
Old 02-15-2004, 03:35 PM   #15
burntwater
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Distribution: Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Smile

initially i used suse 7.1, then 8.0, i then switched to mandrake 9.0. have been happy with mandrake ever since (9.1, 9.2). the reason for the switch was (and still is) that i feel mandrake is easier to play around with than suse. have tried slackware (very nice, if minimalist) and fedora C1 very good as well.

mandrake 9.2 install from free download edition iso's was the best ever in my experience. detected all hardware etc. perfectly and the configuration part was really easy to do, nice logical and intuitive layout of settings etc.

recall that mandrake have committed to supplying free iso's in future. after the novell aquisition i am uncertain of suse stance on the matter, they didnt have free iso's before. mandrake have a wealth of apps available, check out plf.zarb.org for example, in addition to an excellent update tool

in the end it is up to you, try both, see what u like.

Last edited by burntwater; 02-15-2004 at 03:42 PM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SUSE and Mandrake to one PC kapa Linux - Newbie 2 12-29-2004 10:29 AM
FC vs SUSE vs MANDRAKE vs etc, HELP alphster Linux - Distributions 9 12-20-2004 06:14 AM
Mandrake or SUSE? powerpower Linux - Newbie 27 09-30-2004 09:01 PM
Mandrake vs Suse mykrob Linux - Software 1 09-16-2004 03:16 PM
Suse or Mandrake webwolf70 Linux - Distributions 4 08-16-2004 05:25 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration