LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-13-2019, 07:28 AM   #1
tfrei
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Fargo
Distribution: slackware 14.2
Posts: 103

Rep: Reputation: 18
Which version 32-bit or 64-bit for new install?


I've used slackware as a desktop os for a long time. I'm just a desktop user --not a developer. I've looked for a thread that discusses 32-bit vs 64-bit versions but couldn't find any. I usually install my slackware on a 7 year old lenevo laptop. My question is whether I should use the 32-bit version or the 64-bit version? Given the age of the laptop, I'm leaning toward the 32-bit version since 14.2 32-bit has been working fine so far. Am I missing something by not installing the 64-bit version when the new slackware release comes around?
 
Old 03-13-2019, 07:39 AM   #2
sevendogsbsd
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2017
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,252

Rep: Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011
If your hardware supports 64 bit, I would go with 64 bit. 64 bit supports more memory than 32 and if Slackware drops 32 bit support, you are done at that point. There are arguments about 32 vice 64 (in support of 32) but IMHO, these are nonsense. If your hardware is 32 bit, you have no choice.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-13-2019, 08:43 AM   #3
allend
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Melbourne
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0
Posts: 6,370

Rep: Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748
If you have 4GB of RAM or less, then the additional address space of 64 bit is not an issue. One argument for 32 bit is that the compiled size of programs is less than for the 64 bit equivalent.
However 32 bit is now a legacy architecture. There have been reports of issues with 32 bit kernels, that do not occur on 64 bit kernels, which I suspect reflects less complete testing.
For example, LibreOffice would not start on 32 bit due to a stack gap issue,
and
resume from hibernate not working due to a clash with kaslr.
So, I am with @sevendogsbsd, "If your hardware supports 64 bit, I would go with 64 bit."
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-13-2019, 08:50 AM   #4
sevendogsbsd
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2017
Distribution: FreeBSD
Posts: 2,252

Rep: Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011Reputation: 1011
Good points allend: had not thought about the < 4GB memory situation and also the compiled app size: folks may have limited disk space. I have operated with large amounts of ram and disk space for so long I tend to forget these things.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-13-2019, 10:45 AM   #5
fatmac
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Upper Hale, Surrey/Hants Border, UK
Distribution: Mainly Devuan, antiX, & Void, with Tiny Core, Fatdog, & BSD thrown in.
Posts: 5,479

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
If yours is a 64bit computer, even with only a couple of GB of ram, use the 64bit version.

(I use 64bit O/S on my netbooks, with only 2GB ram, quite happily.)
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-13-2019, 11:05 AM   #6
tfrei
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Fargo
Distribution: slackware 14.2
Posts: 103

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 18
Thanks everyone for your reply.
 
Old 03-14-2019, 10:11 AM   #7
Lysander666
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2017
Location: The Underearth
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 2,178
Blog Entries: 6

Rep: Reputation: 2470Reputation: 2470Reputation: 2470Reputation: 2470Reputation: 2470Reputation: 2470Reputation: 2470Reputation: 2470Reputation: 2470Reputation: 2470Reputation: 2470
Quote:
Originally Posted by allend View Post
For example, LibreOffice would not start on 32 bit due to a stack gap issue,
I think we need to tweak this statement ever so slightly, it's Libre Office Base. I use Libre Office 5 Writer on my 32bit machine and it runs perfectly.
 
  


Reply

Tags
32-bit, 64-bit



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Valve officially confirm a new version of 'Steam Play' which includes a modified version of Wine LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-22-2018 02:05 AM
VirtualBox starting as 32 bit on a 64 bit device which doesn't acknowledge the existence of a 32 bit vbox (installed 64bit) QuantumChaos Linux - Virtualization and Cloud 3 02-23-2017 06:49 AM
which is best, 32 or 64 bit version for a new Mint 18 install ? james2b Linux - General 17 11-07-2016 03:53 PM
[SOLVED] Install the 32 bit version and the 64 bit version, on multilib system. Knightron Slackware 12 12-02-2013 09:23 PM
Which version of 32 bit redhat will install on IBM xSeries 366 (64 bit)? Hello123 Linux - Hardware 2 09-14-2005 05:50 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration