Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I havent ran a 32-bit anything since Windows Vista came out with 64-bit. To me there just isnt any reason to run 32 bit, especially since both my desktop (self-built with Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2) and laptop (Dell Precision M4800, Core i7-4810MQ) have more than 4GB of RAM (both have 16GB.)
Last edited by ArazelEternal; 05-28-2018 at 12:03 PM.
I use Commodore OS 32 Bit ,well I made it.. in 2012 CUSA made a 64 bit version and I wanted it on my old IBM PC that was 32 bit so I made it myself and been updating it every scene that was in 2012. I will change it to 64 bit maybe in the next version but I like how you can use on older PCs too.
Last edited by spannernick1; 05-31-2018 at 12:00 PM.
I think 32 bits is still necessary for older machines (1 core or even some stupidly castrated by Intel 2 core machines!). GNU/Linux is their only salvation!
Distribution: Mainly Devuan, antiX, & Void, with Tiny Core, Fatdog, & BSD thrown in.
Posts: 5,487
Rep:
Whilst I personally am now all 64bit, I've just recently persuaded my sister (71) to convert her old Windows XP desktop over to Linux, so there is still definately a need for 32bit distros - luckily my own favourite has a 32bit version & that is what she is now using, which will make it easy for me to keep up to date.
A bump just to say that Lubuntu will no longer support 32bit from the next version. A surprising move since the distro is aimed at lower-powered machines. At the easier end, Mint 19.1 has just been released and still supports it.
A bump just to say that Lubuntu will no longer support 32bit from the next version. A surprising move since the distro is aimed at lower-powered machines.
I_think_ but cannot confirm this, that they only will stop releasing 32-bit IMAGEs (ISO files, just like ubuntu and kubuntu already have done), but UPgrading from a previous 32-bit install is still supported by both of these (and thus most likely by all ubuntu deratives). It _may_ be that that will change for the 20.04 LTS release, because by then it will become difficult to still support 32-bit for the next 5 years or so.
I'd be interested to see how many people still use 32-bit Linux distros on a regular basis. If you do so, please vote and also say which 32bit distro[s] you are using.
My machine (almost 10 years old HP Core 2 Duo with "only" 4 GB) never ran anything else and for the foreseeable future I don't think that's gone change.
BTW: Slackware 14.x, of course, although this PC first was installed with 13.1 (which was new at the time).
I was using an AMD Athlon (no-brand) with SW 12.2 at that time, that machine has since given up its services).
I use CentOS 7.6 64 bit on my main workstation, a couple or 3 other desktops, 3 servers and several virtual machines.
I use Ubuntu Mate 18.04 32 bit on an old Dell Latitude 2100 laptop which has been re-purposed as a music jukebox in my workshop. I also use that distro on 3 raspberry Pi computers which, although the processor is 64 bit, the available version of the OS is 32 bit. And with only 1 GB of RAM...
ONly use 64 bits everywhere, but 32 bits on few thin clients
Hi,
Strictly speaking I only work on 64 bits machines.
Even if I still use Fedora 26 i686 on HP thin clients, as they just allow access to Fedora 28 64 bits virtual machines, I hardly consider it a real use.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.