Plan 9 / 9front - Netsurf (browser) porting effort
Other *NIXThis forum is for the discussion of any UNIX platform that does not have its own forum. Examples would include HP-UX, IRIX, Darwin, Tru64 and OS X.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm not sure if Mozilla has proposed something recently. Yes, Mozilla was first way back when, but I don't know if they are proposing anything today that might compete with or be an alternate proposal to Google's client hints.
That's what I meant by de facto standard. If no other mechanism is proposed, Google's might become the "latest de facto" standard.
The Haiku browser seems to use WebKit, probably it detects the “Apple” substring.
I haven’t managed to try 9front with NetSurf just yet - too much stuff going on, currently. I’m curious for screenshots though!
Here's several. As you can see, images don't work yet, and if you look closely you might be able to see that cirno load and syscalls are almost 100% when loading a page. As far as building the browser, it didn't take long at all. Luckily I had git9 installed already.
Quote:
Originally Posted by YesItsMe
Ha, Netscape was first (“Mozilla/“)!
That's the user agent of plan9, even Netsurf uses that.
Looks like someone should work on fonts too...
Or rather, maybe the NetSurf libraries (Duktape, the HTML/CSS libraries et cetera) could be integrated in Mothra? Hmm.
Thanks.
Of course they know how to make themselves look like the good, privacy loving guys in this, when in reality they want to "fine tune" user data aquisition.
Looks like someone should work on fonts too...
Or rather, maybe the NetSurf libraries (Duktape, the HTML/CSS libraries et cetera) could be integrated in Mothra? Hmm.
Yes fonts would help. However right now I think the two most important things would be better img support, and speed, since it's painfully slow. I wouldn't be surprised if some components could be used to enhance Abaco and Mothra.
Distribution: Ubuntu 19.04 on Lenova ThinkPad T440
Posts: 141
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ondoho
Thanks.
Of course they know how to make themselves look like the good, privacy loving guys in this, when in reality they want to "fine tune" user data aquisition.
Yes, I agree with you completely. I did not mean to imply that I agree with, support or advocate for Google. I was just saying that if the industry does not try to create consensus, Google might create the latest de facto standard as a result of their size and influence. If that happens, everyone might just very well decide to captivate and follow. I think that would be a mistake as I agree that Google is good at making themselves appear to be altruistic but in fact are quite the sinister imp wreaking havoc.
I thought that it might be interesting for browsers to get involved now to create a fair standard that has design goals of insulation from the complex historical browser lineage and also privacy and so forth.
Perhaps other projects such as Plan 9 could be influential by partnering with browser authors who agree to build something standard, safe, private and robust. I think there might be strength in several projects supporting each other. A good OS like Plan 9, a reputable browser or browsers that work closely with the OS platform to deliver high performance, light-weight foot print and security, etc.
Meanwhile, I asked on the IRC about merging Mothra and NetSurf, and I was told that it probably wouldn't be worth the effort instead of writing a native UI from scratch. Well, good to know at least.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhimbo
Perhaps other projects such as Plan 9 could be influential by partnering with browser authors
The current version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux uses the 9P protocol to ensure integration of the virtual Linux drive...
Well, I haven't gotten around to trying Netsurf with 9front, because I'm having too much fun with Haiku. And WebPositive is a decent browser, but I'll have to check out the other options, too, I believe Netsurf is one of them.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.