BodhiThis forum is for the discussion of Bodhi Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
But I don't think it's going to happen. They already include Firefox with the apppack release. And the regular releases they want to keep small and let people install whatever browser they want. People can then remove epiphany if they want.
Epiphany isn't a good choice. It's updated less frequently than something like Firefox or Chromium. A web browser is one of the most important thing that needs to be getting regular security updates...Pale Moon can be a good compromise, since it's just Firefox without the bloat...
counterpoint: It doesn't matter since the user is expected to install a "real" browser, just like they're expected to install a PDF reader. Therefore, the smallest footprint that supports the App Center is the best choice.
I've suggested palemoon as the default browser actually, its what I use as primary browser on my legacy machine. They did add it to bodhi repos tho, as its not in ubuntu repos, to allow for easy install.
This release (5.1) is the first one with epiphany. They used to include an even worse browser, midori, the old versions wouldn't even work on many websites. At least it seems like this epiphany browser works.
But yeah the point of bodhi is install whatever browser you like. I personally use Firefox as my primary browser, but also have Chrome installed for when I need another browser as a sanity check for flakey website, or when I want to cast youtube or voice search.
I use several browsers on my PCS, and I use Pale Moon as my default on my Win 10 desktop. I did recently replace Midori with Epiphany and so far I like the move. Epiphany seems more reliable compared to Midori and I access this forum with it. My opinion: Epiphany is a better default install choice. Tab behavior is good from the get go. 'Seems' leaner and faster, too. Again, I also have Firefox, Vivaldi (sometimes printing from a web page gives me trouble in this browser), and Falkon (my default search browser w ASK.com in bodhi).
My opinion: Epiphany is a better default install choice.
+1
Bodhi should be, and is, as lightweight as possible by default. Epiphany is therefore a fine choice. You can simply install Firefox, Chromium and/or Chrome etc. afterwards.
Epiphany freezes up computers as I have gotten several complaints from friends & family they are calling Epiphany a piece of useless junk.
I have never had Epiphany freeze my computer when I used it for a couple days, but it does use a Lot of memory which slowed down the PC.
I found that Falkon is a good lightweight Web Browser.
I would point out that Firefox, Web, and Midori (and the various variants of them such as Pale Moon, Waterfox, etc) are the only browsers out there not using chromium code at the present time. We should support any and all of these.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.