[SOLVED] Not all ascii characters are showing in text editors.
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Those missing symbols aren't ASCII, they're Unicode.
Try setting your editor to view UTF-8, if possible. Although, in saying that, if an editor doesn't display the tulip emoji then I'm surprised it's showing the trash emoji.
If that doesn't work, change the font being used by the editor. Perhaps the font you're using (system font?) has incomplete coverage of Unicode symbols.
I tried a new font in LO Writer and Pluma. Also opened with Pluma and selected the UTF-8 option.
There's an 'add/remove character encoding option' in Pluma, I noticed this (image). Only Western is shown. I see no UTF-8 in the left column.
There's nothing wrong with your locale or your software. You just don't have a font with every unicode symbol, something which doesn't actually exist. Whatever font you're using, the designer evidently thought that Trash was worth having and Tulip wasn't. I don't have either in any of my fonts.
Actually, that application shows all the characters available. When you select a font, it merely gives that font preference when picking a character. For a display confined to the characters in one font only, use the character inserter in Writer.
AwesomeMachine was probably referring to GNOME Character Map, a GUI program that contains a drop-down list of fonts so one can see what characters are included in each font.
There's nothing wrong with your locale or your software. You just don't have a font with every unicode symbol, something which doesn't actually exist. Whatever font you're using, the designer evidently thought that Trash was worth having and Tulip wasn't. I don't have either in any of my fonts.
AwesomeMachine was probably referring to GNOME Character Map, a GUI program that contains a drop-down list of fonts so one can see what characters are included in each font.
So was I! As I said, it shows the characters from the selected font where available and from any other font where not. I've just checked, and I have the 2017 version 10.0.2.
Install some fonts with more symbols. On Debian, I install fonts-symbola and ttf-unifont and get pretty good symbol coverage.
I went to install fonts-symbola and that was all was needed. I can now see all of the characters in Pluma, LO Writer, etc. - regardless of what font I use.
Thank you Myk267.
Last edited by linustalman; 07-24-2018 at 03:24 AM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.