Red Hat This forum is for the discussion of Red Hat Linux. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
01-14-2004, 01:34 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 27
Rep:
|
Why Even Upgrade to Fedora?
Everyone,
I know that this is probably a dumb question, but...
If we have the ability to upgrade all of our packages and even the kernel, why do we care if Red Hat stops support of RH9? What is the advantage of having a distro that is packaged all together? Can't we just upgrade the kernel and tools independent of the distro?
Chris
|
|
|
01-14-2004, 05:17 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: The Arctic
Distribution: Fedora, Debian, OpenSuSE and Android
Posts: 1,820
Rep:
|
You sure can. I dumped Fedora pretty quick and returned to RedHat 9. The only problem I see in sticking with RH 9 is that package availability may get a little harder as time goes by, unless you are cozy with compiling from source.
|
|
|
01-15-2004, 12:16 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 27
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Well I figure that as long as there are a few people out there still using RH9, that rpms will still be made. After all you can convert from other distros like debian, and it's not going anywhere.
On a side note... I had a very interesting phone call from Micro$#*t today. I got an email touting all of the security issues of the new 2003 server and I went ahead and got the free security kit for kicks. I had to fill in a questionaire stating other competing OS's I was considering, so of course I mentioned Linux. That was Monday. I got a phone call fom them today asking for more info and if I had any other special needs they could help with. I found it very amusing that they are calling people trying to pimp Windows to people considering Linux.
Having a low cost, highly reliable, robust and secure OS in Linux is awesome... but,
Blasting Window's Total Cost of Ownership, Security and Reliability records and cost... to Micro$#*t, long distance on their dime...
Priceless... I think I'm tearing up...
Chris
/dev/geek
I love this stuff!
|
|
|
01-15-2004, 05:21 PM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Distribution: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Posts: 120
Rep:
|
Quote:
Well I figure that as long as there are a few people out there still using RH9, that rpms will still be made.
|
I dont see that happening, already people with RH 7.2 are on the verge of insanity when it comes to packages. What Pcghost says is what is going to happen
King Nothing
|
|
|
01-17-2004, 02:40 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 27
Original Poster
Rep:
|
But RH7.3 was replaced by another RH...
If people really get fed up with Fedora, there's nowhere else to go with RH.
But I agree there's no way it'll get better. I just wonder what the longevity is going to be. People are still using 7.3.
Chris
|
|
|
01-17-2004, 08:36 AM
|
#6
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Devuan Beowulf
Posts: 514
Rep:
|
Well i upgraded to fedora a couple of days back, its gonna go back to 9 next.
Its the most messy version ive come across, errors all over the board. Games not working properly.
Id go back to slackware, but i couldnt get the network interface up in 9.1 and x wouldnt load (and spent 4 days trying to fix it).i guess i'll have to go back to 9.
PS. did i mention i left windows to get away from this reinstallation malarky/
|
|
|
01-17-2004, 02:22 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: The Arctic
Distribution: Fedora, Debian, OpenSuSE and Android
Posts: 1,820
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by chrisplinux
But RH7.3 was replaced by another RH...
If people really get fed up with Fedora, there's nowhere else to go with RH.
But I agree there's no way it'll get better. I just wonder what the longevity is going to be. People are still using 7.3.
Chris
|
This is exactly what lead me to give SuSE 9 a shot at ruling my desktop. As much as I liked Red Hat, their decision to abandon their desktop Linux offerings left a bad taste. I still use RH9 on several of my servers but the first time I encounter the effects of the loss of development in it, I will be changing distros on my servers as well.
For desktop use, SuSe wins all IMO. It is even well worth the money for the box set, partially to get the manuals and partially to support Novell.
|
|
|
01-19-2004, 12:09 AM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: USA, Tennessee
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 307
Rep:
|
In a word... stinks. Fedora has much work to get it to the Mandrake or others level. They was right there and then... Fedora emerged.
|
|
|
01-19-2004, 12:22 AM
|
#9
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 29
Rep:
|
Wouldnt they continue to make RPM's due to the fact that redhat will still offer Enterprise Linux and what not?
|
|
|
01-19-2004, 12:37 AM
|
#10
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 27
Original Poster
Rep:
|
PCGhost,
I have to agree about the SuSe. I just got the live 9.0 version and played with it over the weekend... pure gold. It was a very nice desktop arrangement. I too am considering it as an RH replacement. Can you tell me anything about their package management? Apt, yum or something else?
Chris
/dev/geek
|
|
|
01-19-2004, 03:46 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: The Arctic
Distribution: Fedora, Debian, OpenSuSE and Android
Posts: 1,820
Rep:
|
Package management is handled by YaST, which is similar in some ways to APT. I think it actually includes APT and/or YUM sources. There are lots of sources available and I would give it an A- overall. The minus is only for the search engine that is integrated into it.
The SuSE control center is great. You can have different settings for as many networks you normally connect to and can switch all settings back and forth with the click of a mouse.
The default install of SuSE 9 is a little bloated for server use, but it is pure magic on the desktop. I just do custom installs on my server to slim it down.
|
|
|
01-26-2006, 09:53 AM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Distribution: Fedora Core Since version 3
Posts: 193
Rep:
|
i've ran fedora 3 for 10 months, no problems, then the machine died, and fedora never booted again, knoppixed my data out, but stuff hasn't worked the same since.
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 01:23 PM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Shelbyville, TN, USA
Distribution: Fedora Core, CentOS
Posts: 1,019
Rep:
|
I think FC3 has been the best Fedora yet. I had so many problems with 4 that I had to junk it. I've actually been using CentOS and I've been very happy with that. Good package availability and it caters to my familiarity with RedHat.
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 04:03 PM
|
#14
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Distribution: Fedora Core Since version 3
Posts: 193
Rep:
|
fc3 is great, 4 is crap, nothing but trouble so far. i'll run 5 maybe (when it comes out) if its stable, for now fedora 3 is it for me. i've had friends do ok with 4, but because i am usaully running it on server hardware, 3 seems better and more stable
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 04:29 PM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,755
Rep:
|
Keep in mind that Fedora Core 3 and before have been discontinued and there are no more updates for them except security updates from the Fedora Legacy project. That's why you can't "just upgrade all the packages".
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|