Red HatThis forum is for the discussion of Red Hat Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Yeah - so I have CENTOS 5 installed and I need to test some stuff using the latest version of FF (2.0.0.6) & well, the latest version RHEL / CENT has available that I can find is 1.5.x. So I download the latest version via tarball from Mozilla.com and extracted the directory. The directory I just extracted matches exactly with /usr/bin/firefox which I assume is the directory that calls my outdated version.
Can I simply just overwite the files with the latest versions I extracted from the tarball or will this mess something up?
Thanks for the link - sadly that sounds like a mess. Installing Firefox 2.0 in a different path than Firefox 1.5 and making sym links all over the place...Ugh - I simply would like to replace the old version with the latest version. Should be as simple as that but I think for what it's worth, I'll stick with 1.5.
So you're saying that if I download the above src.rpm and run that following command, in 30 minutes I will have an installable RPM file that will "replace" my outdated version?
Distribution: RHEL/CentOS/SL 5 i386 and x86_64 pata for IDE in use
Posts: 4,790
Rep:
As long as you meet the dependencies required by the resulting binary firefox rpm and spec file for building, Yes. The time will vary somewhat depending on your CPU speed, memory and etc. The command listed in my earlier reply is issued after installing the source rpm file;
Have you tried to get an rpm of firefox 2 for fedora7 and install it in centos5? I did a similar think with thunderbird 2.0 (its rpm for fedora 7) and installed it on a redhat 5 platform and it worked. Able to use thunderbird 2.0 on rhel5...... well I think it should also do for firefox.
---------
Biggest problem in compiling is having the dependencies... a pain. Well hope you get it to work!
@lenard
gee that src is for fc8.... fedora core 8? 8 already? wow... so fast...
Last edited by chickenjoy; 09-17-2007 at 09:08 AM.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.