LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Red Hat
User Name
Password
Red Hat This forum is for the discussion of Red Hat Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-13-2004, 07:56 AM   #1
manub
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Naples, Italy
Distribution: Redhat 9.0
Posts: 35

Rep: Reputation: 15
smp kernel without multiprocessor ?


I've installed RedHat 9 on my system. However, when booting, GRUB makes me select also for a smp kernel.

Red Hat Linux (2.4.20-8smp)
Red Hat Linux-up (2.4.20-8)
Windows XP

I don't know if it's normal, either because I have got only a processor. I'm running an Athlon XP2400+ (oc'ed to 2600+, 166x12.5) with a A7N8X Deluxe motherboard (nVidia nForce2 400 based). Is this normal ? Why should I use smp kernel instead of the normal one and/or viceversa ?

Perhaps this is a stupid question ... but I'm also in trouble with SATA drivers (I'll do a post later) and perhaps it can help. Thanks in advance.

Last edited by manub; 03-13-2004 at 08:05 AM.
 
Old 03-13-2004, 08:09 AM   #2
TBC Cosmo
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Distribution: Fedora 10, CentOS 5.4, Debian 5 Sparc64
Posts: 356

Rep: Reputation: 43
It does'nt harm anything to run the SMP kernel, but if you dont want to see it, remove the entry from /boot/grub/grub.conf, or just change default to 1 instead of 0 in there.
 
Old 03-13-2004, 08:13 AM   #3
manub
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Naples, Italy
Distribution: Redhat 9.0
Posts: 35

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
ok, but I'm wondering how it happens ... with my previous motherboard, based on a VIA chipset, I can't select it. perhaps it's due to dual-channel memory ? and what kernel is more accurated for my system ? sorry for my English, of course
 
Old 03-13-2004, 08:25 AM   #4
TBC Cosmo
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Distribution: Fedora 10, CentOS 5.4, Debian 5 Sparc64
Posts: 356

Rep: Reputation: 43
Look here for details, I'm not a hardware expert by any stretch, but perhaps your setup us capable of hyperthreading? It looks like Redhat gave you that option because it thinks your motherboard is SMP capable. I would run that kernel just to see if it works for you.
 
Old 03-13-2004, 08:30 AM   #5
manub
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Naples, Italy
Distribution: Redhat 9.0
Posts: 35

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Ok, thanks for the link. However I'm still curious of what can it bring in order of performance increasing ... and I'm really wondered about my CPU and MOBO supporting SMP ... if anybody know something deeper in hardware specs, please reply (and really sorry for my English !).
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any reason to keep a non-smp kernel installed on a smp FC3 machine? jim-j Fedora 2 03-12-2006 07:06 AM
smp kernel: uncompressing Linux ..ok booting the kernel krissb Linux - General 1 11-16-2005 06:31 PM
Kernel-Patch Debian Logo 2.6.2 not correctly working for custom kernel 2.6.11 smp deepclutch Debian 3 06-27-2005 03:59 AM
kernel 2.6.x SMP a68254 Debian 4 11-12-2004 12:58 AM
SMP Kernel Help kbud Linux - Hardware 1 11-04-2003 09:20 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Red Hat

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration