Red HatThis forum is for the discussion of Red Hat Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm trying to install the newest Snackamp rpm and this is what I've done and what's happening:
Currently installed:
snackamp-2.2-4.fdw.test.rh90.noarch.rpm with
libsnack-2.2.7-1.0.rh9.dag.i386.rpm
uses tcl 8.3
Works, but a bit buggy. So I'd like a newer version
Trying to install:
snackamp-3.0.2-1.dag.src.rpm
Step 1: rebuilding the snackamp-3.0.2-1.dag.src.rpm
error message reads:
error: Failed build dependencies:
tcl >= 8.4 is needed by snackamp-3.0.2-1.dag
Step 2: Install required tcl packages
rpm -ivh tcl-8.4.5-7.i386.rpm tcl-devel-8.4.5-7.i386.rpm
Says it conflicts with:
file /usr/share/man/mann/unset.n.gz from install of tcl-devel-8.4.5-7 conflicts with file from package tcl-8.3.5-88
and a bunch of other stuff related to tcl-8.3.5-88
Step 3: try to upgrade current tcl package instead
rpm -Uvh tcl-8.4.5-7.i386.rpm tcl-devel-8.4.5-7.i386.rpm
Get this message:
[root@localhost tcltk]# rpm -Uvh tcl-8.4.5-7.i386.rpm tcl-devel-8.4.5-7.i386.rpm
warning: tcl-8.4.5-7.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2
error: Failed dependencies:
libtcl8.3.so is needed by (installed) tuxracer-0.61-19
libtcl8.3.so is needed by (installed) compat-db-3.3.11-4
libtcl8.3.so is needed by (installed) expect-5.38.0-88
libtcl8.3.so is needed by (installed) isdn4k-utils-vboxgetty-3.1-62
libtcl8.3.so is needed by (installed) postgresql-tcl-7.3.2-3
libtcl8.3.so is needed by (installed) postgresql-pl-7.3.2-3
libtcl8.3.so is needed by (installed) tk-8.3.5-88
libtcl8.3.so is needed by (installed) expectk-5.38.0-88
libtcl8.3.so is needed by (installed) pvm-gui-3.4.4-12
libtcl8.3.so is needed by (installed) ruby-tcltk-1.6.8-5
libtcl8.3.so is needed by (installed) tclx-8.3-88
libtcl8.3.so is needed by (installed) tix-8.1.4-88
libtcl8.3.so is needed by (installed) tkinter-2.2.2-26
libtcl8.3.so is needed by (installed) csound-4.24-1
libitcl3.2.so is needed by (installed) tix-8.1.4-88
libitk3.2.so is needed by (installed) tix-8.1.4-88
itcl is needed by (installed) tix-8.1.4-88
Step 4: search for libraries
slocate libtcl8.3.so
/usr/lib/libtcl8.3.so
have it
slocate libitcl3.2.so
/usr/lib/libitcl3.2.so
have it
slocate libitk3.2.so
/usr/lib/libitk3.2.so
have it
have them all.
Step 5: Try to force upgrade
rpm -Uvh --force tcl-8.4.5-7.i386.rpm tcl-devel-8.4.5-7.i386.rpm
warning: tcl-8.4.5-7.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2
error: Failed dependencies:
Force does the same thing as Upgrade.
How do I get around this?
Any help would be appreciated.
P.S. I'm not really the King of Japan.
But I'd like to be.
If that doesn't work, I guess I'll try to
rpm --nodeps -e tcl
and install the newer packages.
It will most likely render the dependency packages unusable, but what the hey, I'll just upgrade them. However, I see a potential dependency Catch-22 nightmare that might occur if I need to go that route.
It's good practice I suppose, because I'm sure I'll see this problem again if I continue to RH, Fedora, or any RPM based distributions.
Once again thanks for the input.
I'll reply in a bit on what happened.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.