Mount ftp filesystem in RedHat Enterprise edition 5
Red HatThis forum is for the discussion of Red Hat Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Mount ftp filesystem in RedHat Enterprise edition 5
I am thinking about mounting a filesystem using ftpfs or 'ftpmount' on RedHat Enterprise Edition 5. I notice the ftpfs filesystem is not recognised nor is ftpmount available. Does anybody know if mounting ftp filesystems is supported fot use on RedHat Enterprise Edition 5 ?
Do you know any reliable RedHat sources for FUSE ? We are to some extent limited to who we can get our packages from - either just ORACLE or Red Hat basically
FUSE is available from dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/fuse/ and was recently added to vanilla kernel.org kernels. But if RHN and Oracle are your only two officially allowed sources I guess you can't have it. OTOH if it's just a question of convincing people of code maturity then nothing should keep you from setting up a test box, doing a code audit on FUSE, build it and see how it performs.
no NFS daemons on the target server and none likely to be forthcoming.
I've used curl which gives a kind of smoother solution to pulling down documents in any case. I presume this is a better solution than a virtual filesystem for a (relatively infrequent) upload frequency, no more than once an hour. Is there a greater network overhead with an FTP based VFS than for instance, say, a curl type interface ?
It is just a little unusual to be setting up something like this on a server that you do not have control over. No idea about the overhead but I would suspect that there is a good reason why NFS, samba, cifs, are generally used rather than the method you are suggesting.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.