PuppyThis forum is for the discussion of Puppy Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Does the source have a configure file?
I usually just do a ./configure followed on completion of that by make.
Nah, no configure script.
I tried compiling it on puppy again and this time it actually started to compile, but failed. (sorry, didn't bother to write down the error)
Then I applied the 2.6.29 patch from broadcoms site and tried compiling again, but it still failed.
I know you can't help much without the errors, so I'll post them later. But if anybody has been able to compile this on on upup, please let me know how you did it.
OK, the error was caused by a missing /usr/src/linux-2.6.29.4/include/linux/bounds.h
I noticed that there was a bounds.h in /usr/src/linux-2.6.29.1/include/linux, so I copied it over to 2.6.29.4.
After that, the driver successfully compiles.
The only problem now is I get a kernel panic every time I "modprobe wl"
Any ideas?
It just might be a compiling kernel mismatch.
I clicked on my upup-476.iso, to mount it and then clicked on upup-476.sfs to mount it.
then I navigated to lib/modules.
It showed a folder for the kernel that was 2.6.29.3.
So that would mean the wrong kernel source was used to compile the driver.
You can verify the kernel version used in upup 476 by navigating to /lib/modules and see what kernel version was used by the name of the folder.
If it does not match your kernel source sfs file you have a kernel incompatibility.
It just might be a compiling kernel mismatch.
I clicked on my upup-476.iso, to mount it and then clicked on upup-476.sfs to mount it.
then I navigated to lib/modules.
It showed a folder for the kernel that was 2.6.29.3.
So that would mean the wrong kernel source was used to compile the driver.
You can verify the kernel version used in upup 476 by navigating to /lib/modules and see what kernel version was used by the name of the folder.
If it does not match your kernel source sfs file you have a kernel incompatibility.
2.6.29.3?
Thanks, I'll check that out.
Could've sworn it used 2.6.29.4, but maybe I made a mistake.
EDIT:
Quote:
'upup-476.iso' is the standard Jaunty Puppy build, kernel 2.6.29.4.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.