[SOLVED] Can I record the digital audio from motherboard
PuppyThis forum is for the discussion of Puppy Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It will be digital. The computer can't really record analog like an LP record might record. It records like an MP3.
See the Audacity manual for how to record sound. Your issue is complicated by what may be available in Puppy.
It may only record in digital but if I record something on audacity and clap my hands or speak near the laptop it picks it up and goes into clipping. The mic is set at zero in alsamixer.
I can tell you for definite now that Tahr does not use PulseAudio. No Puppy, to the best of my knowledge, ever has used it in default condition. The only 'Pups' that do, and which are not 'true' Puppies, are the DebianDogs....and these are based on the Debian LiveCD, customized to look and act like a Puppy. They are more truly Debian than Puppy, as they use Synaptic, apt-get, sudo, and all the rest of the 'traditional' infra-structure..
To call any Pup 'Ubuntu-based' or 'Slackware-based' is only true insofar as they are built using binaries from those distros. It's true that PulseAudio can be installed if the user so wishes, though in Puppy it has a horrible tendency to introduce more problems than it solves. One single situation which, by itself, underlines just how different Puppy is to the majority of 'mainstream' distros that standardized on PulseAudio quite some time ago.
For those situations where PulseAudio is called-for by certain apps, various well-documented 'workarounds' are from time to time employed.....more often than not variants on the 'apulse' libraries.
I agree with you that Jack would do what the OP wants; there are already several packages available for it, compiled to work with the majority of 'standard' Pups.....although there is, of course, quite a learning curve involved in getting the best out of it.
diode84, i think you are giving up too fast.
installing jackaudio is a process that requires reading some documentation - did you?
mike_walsh seemed to suggest that this (a documented way to install and use jackaudio) exists for puppy linux.
Quote:
Originally Posted by diode84
Mike I will try debiandogs.
i don't think this was meant as a recommendation; if puppy linux cannot provide you what you need, you can install virtually any (lightweight) distro.
many people recommend antiX for legacy hardware.
diode84, i think you are giving up too fast.
installing jackaudio is a process that requires reading some documentation - did you?
mike_walsh seemed to suggest that this (a documented way to install and use jackaudio) exists for puppy linux.
i don't think this was meant as a recommendation; if puppy linux cannot provide you what you need, you can install virtually any (lightweight) distro.
many people recommend antiX for legacy hardware.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.