LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Programming (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/programming-9/)
-   -   your editor of choice... (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/programming-9/your-editor-of-choice-70366/)

inkedmn 07-05-2003 06:32 PM

your editor of choice...
 
not trying to start any holy wars, honest.

please vote, reasons why are (obviously) optional...

2damncommon 07-05-2003 06:45 PM

You left out Pico/Nano. (But then I see this is in programming...)
I think you are trying to start a holy war.
:D

coolman0stress 07-05-2003 07:57 PM

I usually stick with the simplest.

On Linux: pico, kwrite.
On Win: notepad.

Tinkster 07-05-2003 11:35 PM

epm, not available outside OS/2 ... :/

In Linux: emacs with Else-mode

Cheers,
Tink

shellcode 07-05-2003 11:56 PM

in console: vim

in X: cooledit

it's nice, fast, and has good features.

yapp 07-15-2003 05:16 AM

Well I voted for vim. If you would have asked me this quesion earlier, vim would be my last choice. :p funny how things can change.

Just wondering: back in the Windows-XP days, I used TextPad a lot. It there anything that good and fast available in Linux too? Sure it exists, but never really looked good enough I think.

lokee 07-15-2003 07:35 AM

Vim has my vote, cuz it's small and efficient; it has only what I need to work(no useless things on the sides).
It's an text editor, only a text editor... Not a coffee, vaccum [...] machine like emacs

yapp 07-15-2003 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by lokee
It's an text editor, only a text editor... Not a coffee, vaccum [...] machine like emacs [/B]
hehe You've got my vote too :p but let's not start an vim-emacs here here shall we? :D

Tough, there is something I'd like to share with you: I once read the quote "Emacs is a great operating system, but it lacks good development". --hehe cute. But honestly, I never used emacs, so I believe I'm a little biased.

mad_ady 07-15-2003 09:02 AM

Under text mode I use the editor included with mc, under X, I use kwrite.

As for vim,emacs and the likes, I couldn't do anything useful with them because I couldn't understand how to use them!

mtb 07-15-2003 09:48 AM

Nedit. Sometimes i use vim, but needs a lot of time to be fully understood.

emence 07-15-2003 09:53 AM

If im in the console, i prefer either pico or vi, if im outside the console i prefer QUANTA PLUS..
QUANTA ROCKS IMHO

Nylex 07-15-2003 11:43 AM

Emacs here, don't like vi much.

Mara 07-15-2003 02:51 PM

So I'm first hare to say I don't like emacs and vim, I prefer something simplier - use joe in console, no preference in X.

Mathieu 07-15-2003 06:36 PM

I don't like Emacs and even less vi/vim.

In X, I use kwrite
In console, I use pico

HappyDude 07-15-2003 10:47 PM

Wheres Gedit?

fatman 07-16-2003 08:01 AM

Locally: emacs

Remotely: VIM

tincat2 07-17-2003 04:46 PM

joe works for the simple stuff i do, but i am impressed with the functionality of vim and emacs-for someone who knows what he or she is doing, they've got to be potent.

ionstorm 07-17-2003 05:12 PM

vim or Gvim depending upon what is available.

Daem0hn 07-17-2003 09:32 PM

in console, vim, in X hmmm, i dont really edit in X

alfy 07-18-2003 09:33 AM

I use vi for the same reason any working professional would.

I know that it will be on ANY *nix system I have to work on. I don't have to worry that someone didn't load some other editor that I "like".

In business, your not paid to "like" it. Your paid to DO it.

whansard 07-18-2003 09:42 AM

cat & sed

poloktim 07-20-2003 08:00 AM

I can't use vi or vim or emacs.

No matter how hard I tried.

In X: Nedit (it colours the code depending on the language extension, how cool!).
In CLI: Nano

lokee 07-20-2003 02:42 PM

vim colours the text too... :p

kev82 07-20-2003 02:57 PM

Quote:

cat & sed
LOL

Tinkster 07-20-2003 03:02 PM

Quote:

quote:cat & sed

LOL
That's what I thought ... even though
I might fancy that for the odd minor
modification of a system-file I certainly
wouldn't want to use this for coding ;)

Cheers,
Tink

green_dragon37 07-20-2003 03:05 PM

console: vi / vim it's the only way to go.

X: gvim (ooo, pretty colors)

Ian

synaptical 07-20-2003 03:08 PM

vi/vim so far. as a newb it's just so easy, q = quit, w = write, x = delete, p = put, esc = escape :p j points down and goes down, etc. i haven't learned emacs yet (all those control key combinations, yeck), but so far i see no need to as vim does everything i need and is intuitive in the ways mentioned. :)

slakmagik 07-20-2003 04:22 PM

Damn. Vim's kicking ass. I voted a long time ago but never posted (I do that a lot.) Just out of curiosity, I wonder how the people who voted for something other than Emacs or Vim would have voted if those were the only two choices? Because I use joe unless I'm using mc, so I use mcedit, unless I'm in X and then I pop up whichever one has whatever function I want (usually gedit) - but if I had to pick between the two, that'd be another vote for Vim.

-- Just noticed your sig, synaptical - off to edit my own. :D

LoungeLizard 07-20-2003 05:10 PM

I perfer VI but really does not matter to me, but I will say that when doing anything to config files I stay way from Pico cause it ads some special char that are not seen that can screw up a config file

2damncommon 07-20-2003 05:25 PM

It is best to use Pico/Nano with the -w (no word wrap) option when working with config files.
That is probably what was causing you problems, LoungeLizard.

nakkaya 07-21-2003 04:25 AM

i use emacs localy and remotly with ssh tunnelling yes emacs has a lot of add ons but these help you to do your work inside emacs without leaving the console or the window in x and you can customize every single thing to your taste thats wht makes emacs my editor of choice

aizkorri 07-21-2003 04:42 AM

emacs for coding, pico for everything else.

shishir 07-21-2003 06:44 AM

vim anyday...
simple , easy and customisable

zmedico 07-21-2003 12:26 PM

I like Kate but I use vi when I'm confined to the console.

jspenguin 07-21-2003 03:57 PM

I use Emacs. You would not believe how many files I've screwed up trying to use vim to edit them. I especially like the way Emacs will automatically properly indent a line of text whenever you press tab.

I do have a couple of complaints about Emacs, though.

The keyboard code to exit os C-x C-c. These keys are so close together that I'm always accidentally exiting Emacs. Also, there is no redo, so if you undo too much, you are stuck retyping your code.

Either way, it's better than having to press 'I' whenever you want to type something.

Tinkster 07-21-2003 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jspenguin
Also, there is no redo, so if you undo too much, you are stuck retyping your code.
From the emacs-help :*)
Code:

  Any command other than an undo command breaks the sequence of undo
commands.  Starting from that moment, the previous undo commands become
ordinary changes that you can undo.  Thus, to redo changes you have
undone, type `C-f' or any other command that will harmlessly break the
sequence of undoing, then type more undo commands.

Cheers,
Tink


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 PM.