Programming This forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
01-13-2004, 10:33 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: USA
Distribution: Fedora, CENTOS
Posts: 209
Rep:
|
Simple, small C++ IDE
Okay, I know this thread has been written about to hell and back in the forums but I've added a twist.
I'm looking for a small and simple IDE for C++ coding in linux. Now what I mean by small and simple is that it doesn't add excess files to your project directory.
I tried Anjuta and when I created my first test project, the folder contained 1.4Mb of stuff...and I hadn't even typed my first line of code yet! I had a similar experience with KDevelop 3.0.
Now, I can understand a few configuration files need to be created by the IDE but the fewer the better. Bloodshed-Dev C++ is the type of IDE I'm looking for, but isn't out for Linux (or at least I can't get the publicly available beta version to work for me).
I'd be happy to stick with KDevelop. I like the interface and I've been told that it's easy to configure. However the online documentation is spotty so I haven't been able to 'clean it up' so to speak.
Does anyone have suggestions for a 'clean-running' C++ IDE? Or maybe tips on streamlining KDevelop?
All advice is appreciated.
Thanks.
|
|
|
01-13-2004, 10:40 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian SID / KDE 3.5
Posts: 2,313
Rep:
|
You could always use Kate, ( which provides the editor for KDevelop ) separately, and write your own makefiles. Most of the extra stuff in the projects are configuring scripts, automake and autoconf for makefile.am and such. Once your project is ready for deployment you can create a distribution ( in the tools menu ) and you'll see a dramatic reduction in the number of files. so people can just ./configure, make, and make install, your program. Most IDE's do this to make it simple for the programmer.
|
|
|
01-14-2004, 01:55 AM
|
#3
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Chennai, India
Distribution: PCLinuxOS .92, FC4
Posts: 840
Rep:
|
I suggest that you try to learn Emacs. The effort is worth the rewards. If you learn emacs, or vim, you'll never have the need for any editor again in your whole life IMO.
|
|
|
01-14-2004, 03:00 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian SID / KDE 3.5
Posts: 2,313
Rep:
|
Emacs... or All the effort to learn LISP & Then get yourself a proper IDE and wonder why you bothered 
|
|
|
01-14-2004, 03:49 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Chennai, India
Distribution: PCLinuxOS .92, FC4
Posts: 840
Rep:
|
I don't think so. if you start using emacs, you won't be looking for another IDE at all, as you don't need any other. I've heard of some people joke that emacs unloads *nix from the memory before loading it, but I don't get the joke there. As you can do almost anything from emacs, if you become versed in its use, you will rarely go out of it.
|
|
|
01-14-2004, 05:06 AM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian SID / KDE 3.5
Posts: 2,313
Rep:
|
Trust me, 6 months of it, I'd had enough. Its almost a DE in itself, but damn awkward to use, but then again thats my opinion. What ever floats your boat... Thats the point of Linux anway 
|
|
|
01-14-2004, 05:17 AM
|
#7
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Chennai, India
Distribution: PCLinuxOS .92, FC4
Posts: 840
Rep:
|
Ya, that's the point, but you should not try to FUD new users about what they can love if they learn. At least, I think so. I started to use emacs after it was mentioned favorably in the forums, so I think the same may happen to others!
Also, IMHO emacs is the only complete programmer's IDE.
|
|
|
01-15-2004, 11:45 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Boston
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 92
Rep:
|
is there anyhting else besides emacs? I'm not a huge fan...
|
|
|
01-16-2004, 04:24 AM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian SID / KDE 3.5
Posts: 2,313
Rep:
|
You could try vim, gvim or Rhide.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|