ProgrammingThis forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game.

Notices

Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.

You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!

Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.

Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.

Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide

This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.

Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.

well, if by random you mean pseudo-random then yes using rand() would be the way to go. But, as there is no truly random number (other than maybe radioactive decay), it depends on how random you want it. I recommend you at least seed rand with say an integer from /dev/random or /dev/urandom.

Yes, on your system, with your word length, and a number of other nonportable assumptions, as well as using the modulo operator to select a subrange, a classic beginner's error.

well yours returns a floating point for no reason.
that also means it has to do a (potentially slow)floating point to integer conversion.

Yes, and most uses for rand() in modern times require a float or a double. There is an equivalent integer version, but it doesn't see much use these days.

There *is* a way to get a decent random number out of rand() only using integer ops, but it's painful.

1. Figure out the number of bits B in the next highest power of two of (max - min). If (max -min) happens to already be a power of two, that's nice.
2. Figure out how many meaningful bits rand() can produce. That's relatively easy by counting how many times you have to unsigned right shift to make RAND_MAX zero. Be careful you don't count too many or else entropy goes through the floor.
3. Extract the top B meaningful bits from the rand() call.
4. If that produced a number less than (max - min) you're done. If not, call rand() again until you get a number less than (max - min).

This, of course, assumes that (max - min) < RAND_MAX.

LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.