LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > Programming
User Name
Password
Programming This forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game.

Notices


View Poll Results: Will QT-Free for Windows make you more likely to develop with QT?
Yes! 3 21.43%
I'll consider it. 4 28.57%
Windows isn't important to me and I already use QT. 5 35.71%
No! 2 14.29%
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-22-2005, 08:28 AM   #1
jtshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu @ Home, RHEL @ Work
Posts: 3,892
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 67
QT-Free for Windows


This is really just a news note. It seams as though TrollTech is Releasing QT 4.0.0 for Windows under the same "dual licensing" structure as it currently does the X11 and Mac versions. The GPL'd version of QT for Windows is close on the horizon. I'm going to give a round of applause for TrollTech for there ongoing support of the OSS community.
 
Old 02-22-2005, 08:32 AM   #2
jtshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu @ Home, RHEL @ Work
Posts: 3,892

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 67
I suppose I missed the obvious.. I already use QT and I will enjoy being able to port my applications to Windows easily... especially since it is the category I find myself in
 
Old 02-22-2005, 10:50 PM   #3
oldstinkyfish
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 148

Rep: Reputation: 15
From my understanding the only reason people are using GTk is because of its liscence, you can port it to M$ and you could make prorietary programs with it. Also, from what Ive read QT is much stronger than GTK? SO if Im not interested in selling software, The logical choice would be to learn to program with QT? Right? That is why I was going to learn how to program in GTK, was for its cross platform, not for profiteering.

Let me know if wrong

--Fish
 
Old 02-23-2005, 05:44 AM   #4
Mara
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,696

Rep: Reputation: 232Reputation: 232Reputation: 232
oldstinkyfish, you're right. GTK is LGPL, Qt is GPL. It means GTK programs can be commercial. Qt ones - only if you buy a license.

I'm using both and in Qt you program faster and it has more functions (but not many more). GTK has certain features Qt lacks, however.
 
Old 02-23-2005, 02:13 PM   #5
oldstinkyfish
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 148

Rep: Reputation: 15
Is it just me MARA, or does the KDE folk, seem to be more organized? Well for a beginner you need as much handholding as you can get, where GTK seems to be fragmented. What do you think of documentation?
 
Old 02-24-2005, 03:27 PM   #6
Mara
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,696

Rep: Reputation: 232Reputation: 232Reputation: 232
GTK has quite good docs, the references. it's true that GTK has one, GDK another and glib the third one but you don't use all three at the same time usually.

With Qt docs I have usually 'how is this widget called?'-type problems but it's also very good. Like the examples.
 
Old 02-24-2005, 03:44 PM   #7
jtshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu @ Home, RHEL @ Work
Posts: 3,892

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 67
I have to admit I'm not nearly as knowledgeable about GTK as QT. Does GTK provide all os-inspecific networking/file io commands? With QT you can literaly use the same code from Windows, to MacOS (native, not MacOS-X11), to Linux. Is that possible with GTK?
 
Old 02-24-2005, 04:21 PM   #8
Mara
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,696

Rep: Reputation: 232Reputation: 232Reputation: 232
There's such possibility, but not in GTK itself - in glib. The reference says it works for Unix systems, but Windows version is not fully implemented at this time. Haven't tries it, so can't tell you the quality of it.
 
Old 02-24-2005, 06:48 PM   #9
jtshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Distribution: Ubuntu @ Home, RHEL @ Work
Posts: 3,892

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 67
The first thing that really appealed to me about QT was that I could write code that worked natively in Aqua and X11 as well as have file i/o and network support without having to write two different versions of the code gui's or backends. The windows port just makes it even more appealing as a lot of people I know are still stuck in Windows and like to use some of my software.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help me be free of Windows thef0x82 Linux - Newbie 6 01-28-2005 10:41 AM
Free C/C++ Compiler for Windows? testforechozero Programming 6 08-19-2004 09:29 PM
Will you still use linux, if Windows is free? chinaundead General 68 04-19-2004 07:14 AM
Windows Free !!! JayCnrs LinuxQuestions.org Member Success Stories 21 08-30-2003 10:16 PM
Ready to be Windows FREE!!! scottwest2 LinuxQuestions.org Member Success Stories 2 07-03-2003 02:40 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > Programming

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration