I guess a simple backtracking problem
I want to make a small program that doe the following:
I read a variable k= an the program generates the following: for k=6 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 ..... 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 5 ..... and so on the program has to generate an array with 5 component that summed equals k, and it has to arrange them in all the possibilities. Sorry for my mathenglish :) I`m sorry if this is kinda` lame question but I can't figure it out. I'm new to this field. Maybe you can help me with some hints or with some pieces of code in C/C++. Thanx a lot and again sorry. 
you lost me with the pattern on the second part with the 5's and 1's

He needs to generate a matrix that contains every possibility where the sum of each row equals the variable K.
0 0 0 0 6 == 0+0+0+0+6=6 0 0 0 6 0 == 0+0+0+6+0=6 . . . 1 1 1 1 2 == 1+1+1+1+2=6 and so on... 
that is exacly what i mean... could you help me ?

Would we be doing your school/university homework?
(if not, I apologize for asking) 
nope... a friend ask me to help him and make a program. The program is bigger than this it includes other pieces of code. I was only stoped by this problem.

just iterate through all the numbers from 00000 to 99999 and sum their digits one by one, if they pass, keep them. I can do this in python in one line (but it's ugly as hell and I wouldn't recommend doing it all on one line):
Code:
>>> [str(x).zfill(5) for x in range(100000) if sum(map(int,list(str(x)))) == 6] 
this looks a lot like a compter science assignment so im not gonna do it, im just gonna give you a rough idea on the algorithm i would use. assuming each row is n big.
lets take k=3, 3 can be writen as 0+3, 1+2, 2+1, 3+0, 2 can be written as 0+2, 1+1, 2+0, etc you get the idea. you could write a recusive function that breaks a number k down into a+b, that terminates at depth n then you just need to print the numbers it produces, its a bit brute force but it should work. if you can convince me this isnt an assignment i'll provide you with some code. 
Nice solution.

hko: thankyou :D especially since ive never done computer science or in fact any computer classes at all. totally self taught.
strike: i notice youve made the the assumption that k<10 
It's very tricky really,
say if you've got the number 75 or so if you've got for example an array 1,74,0,0,0 then you've got to find what exact four numbers will add up to 74 eg, 1,34,20,10,10 now you've got that what three numbers add up to 40 1,34,18,12,10 or what two numbers add up to 22 1,34,18,11,11 and so on and on, you get what I mean, there's a good few combinations and permutations in there. 
[code]#include<iostream.h>
int s[20],n,mat[15][5],je=0,key=0; void baga() { for(int i=1;i<=5;i++) mat[je][i]=s[i]; if(s[5]==0) key++; } int chk() { int su=0; for(int i=1;i<=5;i++) su=su+s[i]; return(su==n); } void part(int ka,int n) { int i; s[ka]=n; if(chk()) { je++;baga(); } for(i=1;i<=s[ka]1;i++) { s[ka]=s[ka]i; part(ka+1,i); s[ka]=s[ka]+i; } } main() { cout<<"n=";cin>>n; part(1,n); int j; for(int i=1;i<=je;i++){ for(j=1;j<=5;j++) cout<<mat[i][j]; cout<<endl; } }[\code] I really don't have a way to convince you that this is not an asigment. I`m from Romania and school didn't start... and I'm the second year of highschool... and they don't bother me at school with this kindda problems. The code that I provided up will be included in a much bigger program so excuse the useless variables. This program doesnt generate all the solution that I want: for n=6 6 0 0 0 0 and then it jumps to the next solution 5 1 0 0 0 I need also 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 .... Maybe you could help me adapt the code to do that what I want THX 
umm, i have no idea what you attempting to do in that code, maybe if you used some better variable names and code tags(should have been /code not \code). please dont copy this, try and implement what i said above before you read this.
Code:
#include <iostream> <edit> changed it to a reference after all, i started thinking about large n, without the reference lower bound=4n(2+n), with reference lower bound=12n, thats quite a big difference for large n. 
Quote:
At any rate you can still use the same algorithm to do it, it just won't be as easy as using ndigit numbers. However, if you don't just use ndigit numbers, you would have to first construct the list to test, and if you're going to do that then what you should do is just do the "does the sum add up to x?" test at the creation time. 
Quote:

All times are GMT 5. The time now is 01:38 PM. 