Quote:
Originally Posted by Skaperen
probably not. but maybe with an exchange of questions and answers, we can work that out. i wonder how well search engines will do that in 50 years. i wonder if the search engines, then, will know what i mean by that or will they also need to ask me.
|
No, that is not the best approach. Your original question is just vague and as it is written in the rules: "We're happy to assist if you have specific questions or have hit a stumbling point, however. Let us know what you've already tried and what references you have used (including class notes, books, and searches) and we'll do our best to help. "
Or you can check it here:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-...html#beprecise
Do not expect we will do the work for you (especially when we have no any idea what are you looking for)
And as it was already explained:
If you bothered to search, you should state what search terms you used, and what's wrong with the results you received.
Quote:
This does several things:
1) it would demonstrate that you're not just being lazy.
2) it helps the next person using those same search terms to find an answer.
3) it allows responders to provide useful advice instead of repeating what you've already dismissed.
|
And you still missed it. And we still don't know what do you mean by "easy to parse".
Also would be nice to know if you tried any of the suggestions arrived and if they are acceptable for you (or why not).
Up to know there was no any exchange of questions and answers, you still have not provided useful details.
And finally, a different way of thinking: the quality of the answer is close to the quality of the original post, so it is not worth formulating vague questions
