LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > Programming
User Name
Password
Programming This forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-24-2003, 12:39 PM   #16
david_ross
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Scotland
Distribution: Slackware, RedHat, Debian
Posts: 12,047

Rep: Reputation: 79

vi on the cli and kate in kde
 
Old 10-24-2003, 02:54 PM   #17
Mega Man X
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Solaris, DSL
Posts: 5,339

Rep: Reputation: 65
Nobody here has recommended pico or nano yet . Very easy to use too
 
Old 10-24-2003, 04:18 PM   #18
oopicmaster
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 154

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
But Seriously... EMacs has to be THE WORST editor ever created by man!

Ahem...

Its not a BUFFER... its a File... GEEZUUZZZ!

Oh yeah... let me Switch Buffers!.... Uh....Crap!

But there are those who swear by Emacs...

Why you say?

Simple.... Because human beings can get used to crap!

It doesnt mean that it isnt crap... just because you are used to it!

I mean DAMN.... I can get used to living in a Cave.... that doesnt make it the Taj Mahal!
 
Old 10-24-2003, 04:26 PM   #19
oopicmaster
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 154

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Pico is definitely better than EMACS... .Although Pico still makes the same mistake of calling a FILE a buffer.

Neither PICO, Emacs, or vi are better than EDIT in Windows! Linux needs an EDIT clone!

Bluefish is good... BUT... it doesnt have a NON X version, so I cant use it from the command line when Im not running X.... sigh!

Last edited by oopicmaster; 10-24-2003 at 04:34 PM.
 
Old 10-24-2003, 04:40 PM   #20
david_ross
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Scotland
Distribution: Slackware, RedHat, Debian
Posts: 12,047

Rep: Reputation: 79
Quote:
Originally posted by oopicmaster
Neither PICO, Emacs, or vi are better than EDIT in Windows! Linux needs an EDIT clone!


Why not write on yourself or hack the code of pico or emacs and change the text from "BUFFER" to "FILE"?
 
Old 10-24-2003, 05:07 PM   #21
Claus
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Santiago de Chile
Distribution: Debian testing/unstable
Posts: 74

Rep: Reputation: 15
JAVA programmers generally are so disordered...

Man! Identation is the key!
 
Old 10-24-2003, 05:45 PM   #22
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
If you held a gun to my head and told me to use vi, I would. I try, but it's a pain. If you held a gun to my head and told me to use EMACS, I'd say 'pull the trigger'. I tend to use joe like others have mentioned and I like nedit and gedit (simpleton here! ) in X. Gedit for simple plain text editing sometimes, because it has tabs and nedit doesn't and sometimes I like tabs. Both are pretty straightforward editors. You don't need RH9 to get gedit - it's part of gnome and, if you've got the right libs, you can run it alone. I haven't found a simple tabbed text editor that isn't part of gnome or kde, which sucks, as I'd like to do without those apps entirely.

I don't know if you were serious about EDIT but, either way, you might want to give mcedit a try - it's part of the mc file manager and is a version of cooledit. mc and mcedit paid attention to what was going on in DOS. Cooledit's kinda funky imo, but mcedit's okay.

Oh, and if you were seriously serious, just plug in dosemu and run EDIT, itself.

As usual, you have no shortage of choices - finding anything worth choosing's the trick.

One of these days I'll get the hang of vim, though. Maybe.

Then again, people knock DOS for inflicting edlin on the world but it's a straight rip of ed - Unix is actually to blame for that one - and line editors are actually easier to use than EMACS or Vim, both of which are actually just multi-line editors rather than screen editors. They are immensely powerful but that doesn't change the fact that they are fundamentally primitive - their evolution is defined by inferior hardware and screwed up networking limitations that no PC editor has ever had to suffer from. So the step up from edlin was not to some multi-line weirdness but to a true screen editor like EDIT. That's an inferior implementation, but as other DOS and Windows editors show - and as all newer Linux apps demonstrate by *being* screen editors - it's a superior class. Developers and users just need to stop treating them as inferior based on the low demands of most users and the mystique of EMACS and vi. Things like NoteTabLight are extremely powerful screen editors.
 
Old 10-24-2003, 08:01 PM   #23
oopicmaster
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 154

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
JAVA programmers generally are so disordered...
Im not strictly a JAVA programmer, Im a VB, C, C++, Pascal, JAVA, Assembler programmer with 18+ years of coding experience on PC platforms.

I always indent my code. However, I do not want an editor to force me to do so in a manner in which the editor sees fit.

Quote:
don't know if you were serious about EDIT but
Yes Im serious, if you go to a command prompt in Windows, and type EDIT, it brings up a plain simple text editor....
 
Old 10-24-2003, 08:53 PM   #24
slakmagik
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,113

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Ah. Well, I always found it a little *too* simple, though the Ctrl-P thing is sweet. Well, like I say, mcedit's not far removed and dosemu is an easy install - just grab the latest binary.

mcedit may try to indent you - I can't remember - but if it does, it's easily switched off, I think. And I agree with you - programs volunteering a lot of stuff I neither typed nor configured annoy me, too.
 
Old 10-24-2003, 09:10 PM   #25
oopicmaster
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 154

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Yep, I also hate cars that do that too!

Like some cars automatically unlock ALL the doors depending upon how you turn the key in the door lock!

Whos DUMB idea was that?

I call this kind of thing.... being "Technically Rude".... a person shouldnt be made to feel stupid by using a product.

This is one area where Microsoft has made MAJOR contributions to the computing industry... the whole standardized look and feel, thing.
 
Old 10-25-2003, 12:27 AM   #26
linksocc
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: US
Distribution: Mandrake 9.0 1st/9.1 2nd/Gentoo 1.4 now
Posts: 313

Rep: Reputation: 30
Nano for console and BlueFish for X!!!
 
Old 10-25-2003, 06:49 AM   #27
vanquisher
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 126

Rep: Reputation: 15
How about KWrite? Cool colours...indents only if you want it to indent...try it...personally i'd suggest using Emacs...it's a great IDE and what more, it's by Stallman himself...Vi is small, faster and easier...
 
Old 10-25-2003, 10:28 AM   #28
oopicmaster
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 154

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Emacs is the worst editor ever created! It is so NOT user friendly! It has menu options that dont make sense....

For example.... the Files menu vs the Buffers menu... Shouldnt these just be 1 menu? What is it... a file or a buffer? Then... in the Buffers menu there is the List All Buffers option which PRINTS all of the "Buffers" to the screen! Dumb! Maybe the Authors of Emacs never heard about popup dialog windows? Again... Emacs is WAY too intrusive on the user... A good design would be to have it default to just a plain old text editor, then if the user desides to they can turn on options as they wish....

To the Author(s) of Emacs!...

1) Please study basic user friendly GUI design 101!

2) Learn what a popup dialog is!

3) Choose either File or Buffer terminology! Having both is very confusing! Ill make the choice for you... get rid of the Buffer terminology altogether!

4) Rearrange your menus so that they make sense! Customize, and Options DONT BELONG IN THE HELP MENU!


Thanks.

The Voice of Reason
 
Old 10-25-2003, 11:07 AM   #29
vanquisher
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 126

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by oopicmaster
Emacs is the worst editor ever created! It is so NOT user friendly! It has menu options that dont make sense....

For example.... the Files menu vs the Buffers menu... Shouldnt these just be 1 menu? What is it... a file or a buffer? Then... in the Buffers menu there is the List All Buffers option which PRINTS all of the "Buffers" to the screen! Dumb! Maybe the Authors of Emacs never heard about popup dialog windows? Again... Emacs is WAY too intrusive on the user... A good design would be to have it default to just a plain old text editor, then if the user desides to they can turn on options as they wish....

To the Author(s) of Emacs!...

1) Please study basic user friendly GUI design 101!

2) Learn what a popup dialog is!

3) Choose either File or Buffer terminology! Having both is very confusing! Ill make the choice for you... get rid of the Buffer terminology altogether!

4) Rearrange your menus so that they make sense! Customize, and Options DONT BELONG IN THE HELP MENU!


Thanks.

The Voice of Reason
Nice reasoning...always easier said than done...Why don't you hack the code and make emacs more useful, user friendly and with those popup dialogs? No offense meant, but I think you are not using the complete features of emacs...it's not just an editor, its complete IDE. Well, I use Vim mostly, but sometimes I do code with emacs(Xemacs).
 
Old 10-25-2003, 11:07 AM   #30
oopicmaster
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 154

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Heck... Maybe I will just write an editor myself...

Does anyone know of any good Text based windowing libraries out there for C++?

Thats where all of these editors EMacs, vi,joe,pico, nano, etc, are lacking...

I WANT TO HIT ALT-F-X to exit the editor DAMMIT!

I WANT THE EDITOR TO ASK THE RIGHT QUESTIONS! Instead of "Do you want to Lose your changes" I want the editor to ask "Do you want to Save"

I WANT POPUP DIALOG BOXES!

I WANT A FILE CALLED A FILE... NOT A BUFFER!

I WANT MY STATUS BAR AT THE BOTTOM NOT THE TOP!

INSTEAD OF ^O-WriteOut, I WANT ^S-Save

INSTEAD OF ^W-Where is I WANT ^F-Find and ^R-Find/Replace and in Find/Replace I WANT TO SPECIFY TO REPLACE ALL CASE SENSITIVE!

I WANT TO USE THE SAME EDITOR IN TEXT OR X MODE!


Am I asking too much?
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
text editors for solaris sunOs 5.9 ranger225 Solaris / OpenSolaris 1 11-30-2004 01:42 AM
what are the 'best' text editors (for C, html, js, etc) name_in_use450 Linux - General 4 08-31-2004 08:01 AM
GUI vs text editors R00ts Programming 9 07-20-2004 05:01 AM
Text mode php editors?? friendklay Programming 3 04-21-2004 02:49 PM
Text editors Penguin Dropout Programming 6 06-16-2003 10:22 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > Programming

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration