ProgrammingThis forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
If you held a gun to my head and told me to use vi, I would. I try, but it's a pain. If you held a gun to my head and told me to use EMACS, I'd say 'pull the trigger'. I tend to use joe like others have mentioned and I like nedit and gedit (simpleton here! ) in X. Gedit for simple plain text editing sometimes, because it has tabs and nedit doesn't and sometimes I like tabs. Both are pretty straightforward editors. You don't need RH9 to get gedit - it's part of gnome and, if you've got the right libs, you can run it alone. I haven't found a simple tabbed text editor that isn't part of gnome or kde, which sucks, as I'd like to do without those apps entirely.
I don't know if you were serious about EDIT but, either way, you might want to give mcedit a try - it's part of the mc file manager and is a version of cooledit. mc and mcedit paid attention to what was going on in DOS. Cooledit's kinda funky imo, but mcedit's okay.
Oh, and if you were seriously serious, just plug in dosemu and run EDIT, itself.
As usual, you have no shortage of choices - finding anything worth choosing's the trick.
One of these days I'll get the hang of vim, though. Maybe.
Then again, people knock DOS for inflicting edlin on the world but it's a straight rip of ed - Unix is actually to blame for that one - and line editors are actually easier to use than EMACS or Vim, both of which are actually just multi-line editors rather than screen editors. They are immensely powerful but that doesn't change the fact that they are fundamentally primitive - their evolution is defined by inferior hardware and screwed up networking limitations that no PC editor has ever had to suffer from. So the step up from edlin was not to some multi-line weirdness but to a true screen editor like EDIT. That's an inferior implementation, but as other DOS and Windows editors show - and as all newer Linux apps demonstrate by *being* screen editors - it's a superior class. Developers and users just need to stop treating them as inferior based on the low demands of most users and the mystique of EMACS and vi. Things like NoteTabLight are extremely powerful screen editors.
Ah. Well, I always found it a little *too* simple, though the Ctrl-P thing is sweet. Well, like I say, mcedit's not far removed and dosemu is an easy install - just grab the latest binary.
mcedit may try to indent you - I can't remember - but if it does, it's easily switched off, I think. And I agree with you - programs volunteering a lot of stuff I neither typed nor configured annoy me, too.
How about KWrite? Cool colours...indents only if you want it to indent...try it...personally i'd suggest using Emacs...it's a great IDE and what more, it's by Stallman himself...Vi is small, faster and easier...
Emacs is the worst editor ever created! It is so NOT user friendly! It has menu options that dont make sense....
For example.... the Files menu vs the Buffers menu... Shouldnt these just be 1 menu? What is it... a file or a buffer? Then... in the Buffers menu there is the List All Buffers option which PRINTS all of the "Buffers" to the screen! Dumb! Maybe the Authors of Emacs never heard about popup dialog windows? Again... Emacs is WAY too intrusive on the user... A good design would be to have it default to just a plain old text editor, then if the user desides to they can turn on options as they wish....
To the Author(s) of Emacs!...
1) Please study basic user friendly GUI design 101!
2) Learn what a popup dialog is!
3) Choose either File or Buffer terminology! Having both is very confusing! Ill make the choice for you... get rid of the Buffer terminology altogether!
4) Rearrange your menus so that they make sense! Customize, and Options DONT BELONG IN THE HELP MENU!
Originally posted by oopicmaster Emacs is the worst editor ever created! It is so NOT user friendly! It has menu options that dont make sense....
For example.... the Files menu vs the Buffers menu... Shouldnt these just be 1 menu? What is it... a file or a buffer? Then... in the Buffers menu there is the List All Buffers option which PRINTS all of the "Buffers" to the screen! Dumb! Maybe the Authors of Emacs never heard about popup dialog windows? Again... Emacs is WAY too intrusive on the user... A good design would be to have it default to just a plain old text editor, then if the user desides to they can turn on options as they wish....
To the Author(s) of Emacs!...
1) Please study basic user friendly GUI design 101!
2) Learn what a popup dialog is!
3) Choose either File or Buffer terminology! Having both is very confusing! Ill make the choice for you... get rid of the Buffer terminology altogether!
4) Rearrange your menus so that they make sense! Customize, and Options DONT BELONG IN THE HELP MENU!
Thanks.
The Voice of Reason
Nice reasoning...always easier said than done...Why don't you hack the code and make emacs more useful, user friendly and with those popup dialogs? No offense meant, but I think you are not using the complete features of emacs...it's not just an editor, its complete IDE. Well, I use Vim mostly, but sometimes I do code with emacs(Xemacs).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.