LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > Programming
User Name
Password
Programming This forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-27-2008, 03:22 PM   #1
itnaa
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Distribution: CentOS 4.4 (2.6.9-42.0.2.ELsmp)
Posts: 55

Rep: Reputation: 15
Choice between 64-bit XP & Vista


Hi Folks,

Need to install a Windows based 64-bit OS on a workstation. I'm familiar with XP and would rather opt for an XP 64-bit version. However, would like to put aside personal preferences (especially since familiarity only shouldn't be the only criteria), and check into whether Vista 64-bit is better. Ran a search on XP 64-bit and quite a few articles seem dated (couple of years or so), so am not clear as how it stands up against Vista (particularly performance-wise).

Would appreciate any comments on choice between 64-bit XP or Vista. Many thanks...
 
Old 05-27-2008, 03:51 PM   #2
indienick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: London, ON, Canada
Distribution: Arch, Ubuntu, Slackware, OpenBSD, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,853

Rep: Reputation: 65
This is definitely a tricky question, for several reasons:
  • Microsoft just released its final service pack (SP3) for Windows XP, and I am fairly certain they have declared Windows XP is no longer supported.
  • Vista is a piece of junk; I have had the unfortunate experience of having to use it. It looks nice, but then again, so does Mac OS X.
  • Vista has a massive footprint on the drive when compared to Windows XP. More stuff means more fluff, which means more seek time, which means a slower response time on the system.
  • Windows XP has been around long enough that most of the anti-virus programs out there have managed to tack down any serious virus threats.
  • Vista is somewhat clunky in operation, even on powerful machines; I have been able to get Windows XP to run on a Pentium 2 @ 450MHz.
There are some points. What's more, since this post is in the "Programming" section of LQ, I am under the impression this question is being asked so as to pick a platform to target development towards. My suggestion would be to just use the .NET framework as it is then up to Microsoft to maintain it (the runtime) and not the actual program. The problem with native compilation is that there are *slightly* too many factors that can futz up a native compile process. Sticking to a runtime (with a bytecode compile process) greatly increases the number of valid platforms your program can run on (supplying the runtime provider has targeted those systems). If you're worried about decompiling of the bytecode, a quick Google search can lead to several tools that will take your .NET bytecode, and make it native.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fedora/vista dual boot - partimage: restored vista - vista won't let me log on redmoon zero Linux - General 1 12-31-2007 07:21 PM
Vista=smelly & Vista!=awesome dohpaz General 4 02-16-2007 09:22 PM
kernel choice & other questions coolblue Linux - Newbie 1 05-05-2005 03:43 AM
mandrake10.1 after upgrade kde3.3&gnome2.8 simple loginwith no choice & no desktop msalimane Mandriva 3 11-22-2004 08:27 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > Programming

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration