ProgrammingThis forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
yeah I'm sure it was that function.
I commented out the code in the function and fpath stayed the same
I've fixed the problem by changing process_dir from allocating memory to fpath myself to having it a static character arrary.
so instead of char *fpath; fpath = malloc(etc.......)
its
char fpath[MAXPATHLEN]
unfortunatley this isn't as efficient as the first way I tryed.
since paths are of variable length.
but it does work
I'd still like to know why memory allocated to fpath was changed or corrupted by a function that was outside the scope of that variable.
and shouldn't have access to it.
yup I changed that while I was trying to figure out the other problem to
malloc(sizeof(char) * (strlen(name) + 1));
you could leave out the sizeof(char) since it is just 1
but that's just he way I was taught and I guess its good if the size of a char was to ever change for some reason. thanks for the input
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.