ProgrammingThis forum is for all programming questions.
The question does not have to be directly related to Linux and any language is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have a script, and I'd like to have it echo the standard output to a file; similar to using tee. However, I don't want to force the user to use tee or any file redirection. I want the script to do all of it by itself. Obviously, the simplest answer would be to copy every echo statement. Then change one of each pair so it's redirected to the file.
Another option would be to have a script wrapper. That is, have the wrapper script call the intended script, but add the necessary tee command.
Am I right in thinking there's a better/more elegant way of doing this?
The only other thing I can think of is to echo everything to the file then "cat" or "less" the file at the end. This is probably no good if the script is slow or hangs at all.
Yeah, other people might be using this script, and it might also take a while to run. So, delaying the output might encourage widespread use of Ctrl-C and complaints that my script "hangs". So it would be a mixed bacg waiting until the end of the script and cat'ing the log file as visual output.
I like crabboy's take. That's basically what I was looking for, but just didn't make that mental leap.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.