MEPIS This forum is for the discussion of MEPIS Linux. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
05-18-2007, 06:03 AM
|
#16
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Muncie, IN, USA
Posts: 58
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Hi TSloth,
I have been doing some experimenting and the next thing I am about to try is to install Xubuntu on that box.
Of course, being the compulsive sort that I am, I can't bring myself to pronounce Xubuntu as [zu'buntu] and have to pronounce it [||u'buntu]. (If doesn't mean anything to you, you are probably not alone. See http://isizulu.net/p11n/ and especially http://isizulu.net/p11n/sounds/xoxa.aif for the pronunciation of X in Zulu. )
Paul
|
|
|
06-06-2007, 11:18 AM
|
#18
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS
Posts: 515
Rep:
|
While not intending to replace MEPISLite, a new derivative of MEPIS was released today called AntiX.
http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=04279
You should also try Fluxbuntu as well.
|
|
|
06-07-2007, 08:37 AM
|
#19
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: canada
Distribution: SimplyMEPIS 6.5 final
Posts: 104
Rep:
|
AntiX is the new MEPISLite
Actually it is meant to replace MEPISlite. I am posting from antiX rc5 right now. Installed to hard drive and chainloaded through grub. It is MEPIS with fluxbox. It is based on 6.5. It is meant for older computers and is the fastest version of MEPIS I have ever used. Even quicker than 3.4.3. It takes a little getting used to coming from years of kde. After you do get used to fluxbox it isn't too bad. You still have the MEPIS installer and a lot of other MEPIS goodies. Well worth taking a look if you have an older box to play with.
|
|
|
06-07-2007, 11:16 AM
|
#20
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Houston, TX (usa)
Distribution: MEPIS, Debian, Knoppix,
Posts: 4,727
|
Make sure you give Xfce a fair trial, especially if you can upgrade to 256 MB RAM. It is a "real" Desktop Environment (DE), not just a WM (Window Manager).
I put Xubuntu on my #3 desktop to give Xfce a go. It ran much better after I did a 128 -> 256 upgrade. I could really get to like it a lot. Maybe not enough to switch from KDE where the resources will support it, but it's definitely in the running for the DE on the host OS (SM 6.0 or Etch) on my new "ultra" VM box.
In fact, Konqueror on my #1 desktop (SM 3.3.2) is acting up today, so I am posting this from Firefox 1.5 (barf!) in Xfce.
BTW, I thought that part of the "lite" in SM Lite was dumping OOo in favor of KOffice.
You should be able to start from either the old MEPISLite or the new AntiX & easily install Xfce. One thing to consider is the repo issue: My SM 3.3.2 runs fine, but I frequently can't add newer pkgs. -- APT reports something like "broken package" -- because those repos are no longer maintained. You could maybe solve the problem w/ pinning & a lot of work; but why bother? I just keep running 3.3.2 while I fine tune the plan & build for the VM box, accepting that there will be certain things that I can't have yet. Mostly these are not a big deal.
|
|
|
06-07-2007, 10:24 PM
|
#21
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Manorville, New York, USA
Distribution: siduction, openSUSE Tumbleweed
Posts: 379
Rep:
|
Here's an update....instead of Mepis lite...go to the mepis.com website or distrowatch and look for AntiX (antics). A new version based on the Mepis core that was designed to be used on older boxes. I haven't tried it yet myself, but i'm starting to read good things in the blogs about it.
|
|
|
06-08-2007, 11:55 AM
|
#22
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Greenville, SC
Distribution: Debian, antiX, MX Linux
Posts: 639
Rep:
|
XFCE, IceWM, Fluxbox, and others from MEPIS
Quote:
Originally Posted by archtoad6
Make sure you give Xfce a fair trial, especially if you can upgrade to 256 MB RAM. It is a "real" Desktop Environment (DE), not just a WM (Window Manager).
|
Agreed. XFCE is well worth giving a try if you want a full blown desktop environment that is much lighter than other desktop environments. KDE and GNOME consume considerably more resources.
Another desktop environment that is popular with those on the edge is Enlightenment. Don't be put off by the low sub 1.0 version number (0.17 last I saw). Elive is a Debian distro that uses it, and it works fine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by archtoad6
I put Xubuntu on my #3 desktop to give Xfce a go. It ran much better after I did a 128 -> 256 upgrade.
|
Xubuntu is one solid way to go.
Installing MEPIS, then putting on IceWM or Fluxbox, if you want a light window manager, or XFCE or Enlightenment, if you want a desktop environment, are all workable alternatives.
I had an AMD 400 MHz box with 128 MB of memory and neither KDE nor GNOME would run well (though they would crawl). IcwWM, Fluxbox, or XFCE worked fine and gave me more life with that box.
Feather (not active any more), DSL, and Puppy have all been effective on older hardware, too, but are not quite as rich in apps or packaging (though Puppy is quite clever with what it does have).
Quote:
Originally Posted by archtoad6
You should be able to start from either the old MEPISLite or the new AntiX & easily install Xfce.
|
I would advocate giving the MEPIS 6.5 based AntiX a try. Though it is called RC5, it is close to stable, basing on the stable MEPIS 6.5 and changing to the Fluxbox window manager in place of the desktop environment of KDE. Seems to me if that works for you it will be easy, maybe EASIER, plus you will have current software. Give it a try first, and resort to something else if that doesn't work out. The MEPIS testing repository on the first mirror site has it; some of the secondary MEPIS mirror sites did not have it earlier this week.
|
|
|
06-16-2007, 11:29 AM
|
#23
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Houston, TX (usa)
Distribution: MEPIS, Debian, Knoppix,
Posts: 4,727
|
Don't misunderstand me -- I don't advocate any 'buntu, rather the opposite. I just used Xubuntu as a fast way to get to Xfce up & running to see if I like it (I do).
If/when I put Xfce into "production" as the DE on my VM host box, it will be running on MEPIS, Debian, or perhaps AntiX.
|
|
|
06-16-2007, 02:31 PM
|
#24
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2006
Distribution: Mepis and Fedora, also Mandrake and SuSE PC-BSD Mint Solaris 11 express
Posts: 385
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by archtoad6
Don't misunderstand me -- I don't advocate any 'buntu, rather the opposite. I just used Xubuntu as a fast way to get to Xfce up & running to see if I like it (I do).
If/when I put Xfce into "production" as the DE on my VM host box, it will be running on MEPIS, Debian, or perhaps AntiX.
|
Why not just try to modernize the hardware?
Go to powerleap.com and they can tell you exactly what RAM and CPU is correct for your machine. Use their manual menu for this. My old Dell started life with 600 Mhz and 256 megabytes of RAM. Then I went directly from 98 to XP.... blah!!! Then I went to powerleap. Now I have 1.3 Ghz celeron and 768 megabytes of RAM.
My old machine has aged very well indeed. Today it also features a Promise SATA adapter and a SATA 2 drive, which was a chore to set up. I run XP and Mepis 6.5 with the greatest of ease. The switch to SATA did require me to switch from SuSE 10.0 to Mepis, however.
Last edited by mdlinuxwolf; 06-16-2007 at 02:46 PM.
|
|
|
06-17-2007, 02:19 AM
|
#25
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: canada
Distribution: SimplyMEPIS 6.5 final
Posts: 104
Rep:
|
AntiX is based on SimplyMEPIS 6.5
It uses fluxbox. IceWm if you want as well. It runs well on 128Mb of ram. I have it installed and it is lightning quick.
|
|
|
06-17-2007, 03:54 PM
|
#26
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS
Posts: 515
Rep:
|
While the desktop manager does lessen the RAM usage, it won't do you any good if you're running many services. However, MEPIS itself is pretty good on resources.
On older machines, the more "customizeable" distros tend to be better for older hardware because you can install exactly what you want. Gentoo would get the best out of your hardware, but the compile times would be extremely long.
Slackware or Arch Linux are also good choices as well as Debian (as I said before).
Or, AntiX, which I haven't personally tried, so I can't say anything from experience.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|