Mandriva This Forum is for the discussion of Mandriva (Mandrake) Linux. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
10-09-2004, 05:22 AM
|
#1
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Kathmandu, Nepal
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0
Posts: 14
Rep:
|
Mandrake 9.1: Is it too old for me to install?
I wanted to install Linux on my intermediate-class system. I had to select a distro, and since I'm already running Mandrake 8.2 on my old system, Mandrake seemed to be a good choice for the other, more powerful (but not too powerful PC).
I just wanted to know - does anyone use Mandrake 9.1 anymore? Will I have problems installing software (failed dependencies)? Does everyone already have 10.0/.1?
If it isn't (and because I can't find Mandrake 10 here and my connection's too slow to download), which other major distro would be recommend?
I already have Mandrake 9.1 ISO from a magazine cover-DVD 
|
|
|
10-09-2004, 05:26 AM
|
#2
|
Moderator
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
|
9.1 is perfectly good. You could always set your urpmi sources to the 10.2 repositories and do an upgrade that way. The beauty of Linux is that it's all upgradable in one way or another.
|
|
|
10-09-2004, 05:39 AM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Kathmandu, Nepal
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0
Posts: 14
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Oh, really? I can use 10.2 RPMs with 9.1?
That's great! :d
Last edited by livatlantis; 10-09-2004 at 05:41 AM.
|
|
|
10-09-2004, 05:55 AM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Outlying D.C.
Distribution: Mandriva
Posts: 2,090
Rep:
|
No there are too many dependancies to do that.
In effect you must upgrade your whole system anyway.
Check out some of the places that provide copies of the Mandrake Distro disks for 1.99 USD if your connection is too slow.
Don't bother with a non-current release, especially if you have a slow connection, as you'll be downloading updates forever.
|
|
|
10-09-2004, 06:45 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Kathmandu, Nepal
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0
Posts: 14
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Ah  Thanks for the tip as well...
|
|
|
10-09-2004, 06:47 AM
|
#6
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Kathmandu, Nepal
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0
Posts: 14
Original Poster
Rep:
|
How about Red Hat 9.0.
I don't want to install Fedora Core, so how's that one?
|
|
|
10-09-2004, 03:51 PM
|
#7
|
Moderator
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
|
Now that one is too old - Fedora is effectively RH 10 (just a bit more bleeding/cutting edge.
|
|
|
10-10-2004, 07:31 AM
|
#8
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Kathmandu, Nepal
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0
Posts: 14
Original Poster
Rep:
|
I'm not so much interested in Fedora. I'm more into Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, so I think I'll install 9 first and later upgrade to RHEL 
|
|
|
10-10-2004, 03:13 PM
|
#9
|
Moderator
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
|
RHEL is quite a costly alternative to RH9 - I'd say go for Whitebox Linux. It's RHEL without the RH branding and so is free to download.
|
|
|
10-11-2004, 03:24 AM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: France
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 1,897
Rep:
|
Hello,
I have a laptop with Mandrake 9.1; my tower PC used to use 9.1, too. This version is one of the most stable Mandrake ever created.
Also, I used some 10.0 packages on my 9.1 box before I switched. But many packages will require too many dependencies. On the other hand, I very commonly use 9.1 packages on my now-10.0 box, because Mandrake10.0 is missing a good number of -devel packages if you only have the 3CD-set.
Yves.
|
|
|
10-15-2004, 04:59 AM
|
#11
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Kathmandu, Nepal
Distribution: Red Hat 8.0
Posts: 14
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks for all the input  My attempt at installing RH9 destroyed my Master Boot record. Anyway, that's was Partition Magic's fault. I'll attempt installing again. I haven't yet decided on a simple, powerful distro.
How's Debian? I know there are no RPMs, but apt-get sound's good. What say you? 
|
|
|
10-16-2004, 11:39 AM
|
#12
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: London
Distribution: Susi 9.1, Man10 amd64, Man10.1
Posts: 243
Rep:
|
Hang on you want to install a really dated mandrake and then you ask about another distro.
Load mandrake 10.1 and if it's a problem of money load the 3 iso's of 10.1 and boot from that.
Really, you cannot ask the community to start helping you with such an old distro, when there ars so many fixes that have gone by and the present 10.1 is leading edge.
Who's being unfair?
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|