MandrivaThis Forum is for the discussion of Mandriva (Mandrake) Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have installed Mandriva2007.My second hard disk,named as hdb,was not detected at installation time,after detecting that with harddrake,still it is not mountable,because,in configuring that,a message said to me that its' file system (already ntfs) must be changed,so i cancelled the configuration because,i need to use that when i am working with my first operating system (windows7)too (because more than 90% ofit consists of music and movie files)
Windows related partitions(ntfs) on hda(Mandriva is here too) are already mounted.
My question is:
-why file system on hdb must be changed?Because if ntfs is not use able by Linux,then how are they used in other(hda) disk?
-How do i solve this problem? Thanks
Distribution: Mandriva 2009 X86_64 suse 11.3 X86_64 Centos X86_64 Debian X86_64 Linux MInt 86_64 OS X
Posts: 2,369
Rep:
First why mandriva 2007 ?
Mandriva 2007 is rather old now ?
Why not the new version of mandriva being mandriva 2010 .
Where did you install mandriva sda or sdb ?
First why mandriva 2007 ?
Mandriva 2007 is rather old now ?
Why not the new version of mandriva being mandriva 2010 .
Where did you install mandriva sda or sdb ?
Hi
-Linux software (specially new versions) are not easily found in the country where i live.
-Internet download speed (specially on my home area) is very low and with disconnections and errors,so not easy to download.It took 5 years to get here !(Mandriva2007).
-Both Mandriva and windows7 are installed on the same hard disk (sda,or, hda)
Distribution: Mandriva 2009 X86_64 suse 11.3 X86_64 Centos X86_64 Debian X86_64 Linux MInt 86_64 OS X
Posts: 2,369
Rep:
Linux do not use NTFs as his file system but ex2 or ex3 or ex4 .
If you have installed mandriva on sda than it has changed a partition in linux native.
Which part open a terminal and give the command fdisk -l(L lower case ) as root or su or sudo to find out.
But linux can read a ntfs file system and even write on it
Linux do not use NTFs as his file system but ex2 or ex3 or ex4 .
If you have installed mandriva on sda than it has changed a partition in linux native.
Which part open a terminal and give the command fdisk -l(L lower case ) as root or su or sudo to find out.
But linux can read a ntfs file system and even write on it
Hi
Yes,but the dedicated space(on hda) to Mandriva was formatted and changed to ex3at installation time and now is as root(/) and nearly 600 MB was given to ./boot(also formatted and its' file system changed),and 1600MB for Swap ....all this was a (deleted) free space which formerly consisted of other Linux distribution software(ubuntu),and ex2,ex3,ex4....
I know that Linux can read and write on ntfs,but my question was,why Linux wants to change file system on the other hard disk(hdb)?and why doesn,t configure it without changing it?In other words,what is the reason for changing file system on this device,and why is that blocked now? and why can not be mounted? I regard hdb as a store,which (mainly)consists of music and movies(95%) and some downloaded but not installed windows program files,so this store if becomes formatted and file system changes from ntfs to other Linux desirable file system,then possibly windows will not be able to read that or write on that.I can not format that also because i have to back up all 150 GBs which would need a lot of time and raw DVDs.
Distribution: Mandriva 2009 X86_64 suse 11.3 X86_64 Centos X86_64 Debian X86_64 Linux MInt 86_64 OS X
Posts: 2,369
Rep:
How did you try to mount it as root ?
If a partition or drive is not describe in fstab than root is they only one who can mount or umount .
What is the contents you're fstab ?
Post it over here please .
I suspect you tell the installer to use windows partition to install your system, do you ? And the installer decrease the size of windows partition to let linux to be installed. But with windows 7, there is some hidden partition that is important for its boot. And if you override them, windows wont't boot again.
Mandriva can be downloaded as an usb key of 1Go, maybe it is enouogh for you, without use local hard disk. With a complete distribution on the key, you have all the tool to see what happen on your hard disk.
See in the bios, if some parameter for hard disk is not set other than ide.
How did you try to mount it as root ?
If a partition or drive is not describe in fstab than root is they only one who can mount or umount .
What is the contents you're fstab ?
Post it over here please .
Hello
I was not permitted to change its' properties,any way i changed its' description as repository device.
It was on /dev and a big lock on it. I typed:
chown <my name> /dev/hdb
The lock was removed,but still could not open that,i used find application to find the files on that,but did not succeed,because of some errors.
Again i used harddrake,but that still insisted on changing its' file system! Of course i didn,t agree with formatting or changing the file system on hdb .
Our friend backtolinux totally misunderstood me,possibly because of my weak description.
Thank you both again.
------------------------------------------------------
Counter: #504781
Hi,
yes I misunderstand you because you begun with "I have installed" and I understood "I have to install". Sorry, for my poor english.
When I re read your post, now, I suspect you don't have the necessary package to manage NTFS, in Mandriva 2007. As I know, it's since Mdv2008 that ntfs-3g (package to let you read/write on ntfs file system) is include in the distrib.
Maybe, you have to install ntfs-3g to let you manage ntfs FS?
Hi,
yes I misunderstand you because you begun with "I have installed" and I understood "I have to install". Sorry, for my poor english.
When I re read your post, now, I suspect you don't have the necessary package to manage NTFS, in Mandriva 2007. As I know, it's since Mdv2008 that ntfs-3g (package to let you read/write on ntfs file system) is include in the distrib.
Maybe, you have to install ntfs-3g to let you manage ntfs FS?
Hi
Answering your post is much easier,so i do it first:
Again it seems that still you haven,t read my original post:
Quote:
Windows related partitions(ntfs) on hda(Mandriva is here too) are already mounted.
so,it becomes clear that,ntfs,is already managed,but just on hda,and, not on hdb!
I have to try their guidelines,before i can reply to other friends.
Thank you all.
Last edited by irajjs; 02-11-2010 at 06:05 AM.
Reason: changing repeated word-----> but
what I understand : accessing ntfs partition under mandriva2007, produced always a message saying you have to change partition type, isn't it ?
under mandriva2007, there is a tool to manage the ntfs partition (i forget the name), but writting on with this tool is marked experimental. It's why i suggested you to install ntfs-3g, that is a released version to write more safety and to recognize all the version of ntfs file system.
It was just a suggestion
Disk /dev/hda: 80.0 GB, 80026361856 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9729 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 77 3263 25599577+ 7 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda2 3264 4538 10241406 7 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda3 1 9729 78148161 5 Extended
/dev/hda5 1 76 610407 83 Linux
/dev/hda6 4539 9510 39937558+ 83 Linux
/dev/hda7 9511 9729 1759086 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Partition table entries are not in disk order
Disk /dev/hdb: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hdb1 * 1 19457 156288321 42 SFS
Disk /dev/sda: 2005 MB, 2005925888 bytes
64 heads, 63 sectors/track, 971 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 4032 * 512 = 2064384 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 1 972 1959536
----------------------------
Quote:
600Mb is too much for /boot
--------------------------
There was a space,which was separate from other partitions and could not be integrated with other free spaces,which i used to use that as /boot
I new later that /boot does not need more than 100 MBs,but i did not want to leave a free space on hard disk which probably would be of no use,but for viruses!
Also i can use the excess space for enrichment and enhancement of /boot ,for example adding photos or sound or graphic...etc
------------------------------
Quote:
Your system will require about 5 to 10 gig as /
---------------------------------------------
I dedicated nearly 38 GBs to / (more than half full now)
home, was created automatically
Regards
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.