Looks like it could be a devfs issue... I'm not sure why. I know devfs resolves the "only hda-hdz and sda-sdz are supported" problem by creating that huge path as seen in your df output.
Are you (or is the computer in question) using devfs? I use udev, so that may be why I don't suffer from this issue. Why must your script use the /dev/hd_ notation; it should be able to handle the new naming scheme too.. they stand for the same thing.
Last edited by AngryLlama; 08-04-2005 at 09:22 PM.
|