LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
This is just an informational question: why aren't there any Super Moderators for this forum? Other vBulletin-based forums that I've seen have members called Super Moderators, which is supposed to be a 'lite' version of root. Does the concept simply not apply here, or has jeremy simply never considered it/consdiered it and dismissed it?
I've noticed on other boards that are close to the same size as this one that having a Super Moderator available provides better moderator coverage. The coverage on this board is excellent, but on other boards the moderators are not always available to moderate. So the administrator promotes one of them to the position of Super Moderator, which gives them the ability to moderate any forum.
In no way am I implying that the moderation on this board is bad/poor/biased/wrong/incorrect. It was merely an informational question........
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
One is actually being considered to cover in cases when I am not around. I was just interested in your thoughts on the current mod situation. I think we have one of the best mod crews around. Thanks mods!
Quite frankly, with our current Moderators and the great coverage we have among them, we really wouldn't or don't need a supermod really. But I guess Jeremy having a backup "per se" wouldn't be a bad idea when he's unreachable in some cases.
I give two thumbs up for all the Moderators we have here..
I feel that the moderator crew at LQ is the best I've come across. All very helpful and very efficient. But the concept of a super-moderator also sounds good
I'm sure you're quite "super", MasterC - just like every other mod here
A thought: When jeremy does choose to promote one of the amazingly skilled mods here to the post of Super Moderator, I think he should have the title of "operator" and an avatar which looks like this: http://dynamic3.gamespy.com/~ff9/iko...s/supermod.gif
Originally posted by TheOneKEA I'm sure you're quite "super", MasterC - just like every other mod here
A thought: When jeremy does choose to promote one of the amazingly skilled mods here to the post of Super Moderator, I think he should have the title of "operator" and an avatar which looks like this: http://dynamic3.gamespy.com/~ff9/iko...s/supermod.gif
I just think it would be a cool thing to do.
Well that's basically the same image Jeremy uses except its back and white.
But I do believe Jeremy mentioned whoever becomes supermod, well, one day that is, their title will or might be "sudo"...
That's why I did it: the operator is black and white, because his duties are narrowly and well-defined, and root is colorful, because root can do whatever the hell it wants
thats what i figured, just didnt make since to make somone a supermod who would be lower than a mod or do i have it backwards?i have seen supermods on other boards and thought they were the forum gods so to speak...well anyway, just me two cents
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.