LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Linux in general is often perceived (outside the community) as an old and outdated "thing", LinuxQuestions.org emphasizes that feeling. Not only does it lack the "Web 2.0" look, but it also lacks the behavior. While the current system definitely works, its not visually appealing.
On an similar note, the more Ajax I see, the more I want to play with the site and see what other Ajax stuff I can find, static sites are obsoletes to me.
This of course is based on my own taste and preferences but hope others will agree
The only change to the look I would suggest would be embedding fonts from the Google Font directory rather than specifying Microsoft fonts in the CSS. My reasoning is not aesthetic or technical: it's ideological. It would be step towards breaking Microsoft's forgotten monopoly.
I second that. No unnecessary clutter, clean and functional.
Actually, this is a help site, and not Facebook/Myspace for Linuxers, so no need for the "Web 2.0"-look.
I'm ok with the site using the default vBulletin style but it would be nice if a few extra themes were installed for registered users to be able to select in their personal forum options. I find the long hours I spend at a computer a whole lot easier when using pastel colours for text on dark backgrounds, the look of Sublime Text or Bespin.
I didnt know about that site thank you. Can I assume that every question and answer posted here is mirrored in linuxexchange.org?
I didnt mean JS fireworks when you submit a reply, -knowing now about linuxexchange.org makes this suggestion invalid, but for clarification- what I meant is that 1) I see the same VB look in so many places that I got bored of it, and 2) Some nice features would be nice, like ajax post, multi quote for instance...
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
A couple notes:
* We actually use AJAX pretty heavily at LQ, including for the quick post.
* As part of the next major code upgrade, the site will get an updated look... but we'll continue to stay focused on a fairly minimalist design.
* LinuxExchange does not in any way mirror LQ content - it's a different site with different goals and completely different paradigm.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.