LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Okay, I've searched the archives here and elsewhere related to 64-bit Linux flash plugins for mozillan browsers, and the common wisdom seem to be somewhere in the range of "you can't get there from here". Yeah, apparently I can do some wild contortions to maybe get a 32 bit browser installed, but that is a lame solution. Given the number of linux users who come here, there has to be a pretty high percentage that are similarly afflicted, so I can't help wondering why LQ would have a flash object of some sort (can't see it so I don't know what it is) on their page(s). Every time I go to a new page, I have to dismiss a dialog box that tells me I need a plugin (that is apparently unavaiable). That is getting old fast, and surely some advertiser is expecting people to see their stuff. It would be nice if, for now, LQ could have their sponsors use non-flash screen elements.
There, I've vented, and I feel better now. Thanks for listening.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
We held out longer than almost every site, but with even Google allowing flash now it was getting to be a losing battle. There are a variety of solutions for you, from Gnash to installing an extension that blocks flash code. Note that this is in no way Linux related, flash doesn't work on any 64-bit platform, including Windows XP with IE.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.