LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
My feedback: Everything is working great for me. Only minor complaint is there are (at this moment of posting) a few gif files still being served from static.linuxquestions.org (facebook.gif, reddit.gif) which technically still makes this a partially-encrypted connection. But I imagine you are still in transition.
Regarding performance: I don't know if your CDN gives you any control over this, but I read somewhere that the performance for AES is a lot better in terms of server cycles and and bandwidth for 128-bit over 256. You might consider downgrading to 128-bit AES and see if that helps. Wikipedia and even google.com only provide an RC4 cipher with 128 bit symmetric key length.
Hi. I hate to be the annoying mosquito that keeps buzzing, but I keep hoping to get an LQ that provides a fully encrypted browsing experience, and my tools are still showing a broken connection. Specifically, every time I open a page it makes a connection to account.thequestionsnetwork.org on port 80: