LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
|
05-23-2007, 11:33 PM
|
#1
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594
|
My browser, all day today: 'waiting for linuxquestions.org...' ..waiting.. waiting ..
Am I alone in being unable to browse LQ late last night and all day today?
My browser seems to resolve the site/IP address, but then when it normally would say '..transferring data from LQ..' it instead says '..waiting for LQ.' which it continues to do, loading and loading and loading until I stop it.
I didn't post this in Feedback & Suggestions because I have seen this happen once before, many months ago with another website I had been visiting regularly, and it turned out to be a DNS server issue unrelated to the site itself.
Also, I wouldn't put it past my cheap, slow, rural dial-up ISP to be screwing around with our service, because we're connected to the net all the time, and maybe they're blocking access to LQ from here to try to make me disconnect for a while .
Curiously, I am browsing LQ at this moment through a free proxy service, and it is all working just fine so I'm a tad baffled .
SVA
|
|
|
05-23-2007, 11:45 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware64 - 14.2 w/ Xfce
Posts: 1,631
|
I've been in and out of here all day, GrapefruiTgirl... no slowdowns for me.
|
|
|
05-23-2007, 11:52 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594
Original Poster
|
Well, using this proxy, it's fast as ever and working fine. But if I try to open LQ in an adjacent tab, without the proxy, it just hangs there, loading eternally.. loading.. loading.. never gets loaded.
Damn..
I'll be contacting the ISP if this keeps up through tomorrow
|
|
|
05-24-2007, 08:49 AM
|
#4
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: /USA/MI/Detroit/home
Distribution: MEPIS, antiX, RHEL
Posts: 105
Rep:
|
I had trouble submitting a reply yesterday morning (I gave up after two failed attempts) but it seems to be working now.
sleepy
|
|
|
05-24-2007, 11:03 AM
|
#5
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594
Original Poster
|
Obviously LQ isn't the source of the issue as I am 'here' right now (via a proxy, mind you) and it isn't a firewall issue. I can browse anything else I like, no problem.
Messenger programs work fine too.
Anyhow, I just emailed the ISP (their live chat service only supports I.Eeek.) and their 'Login to your account' page doesn't work lol. Hope I can report something conclusive later today..
|
|
|
05-24-2007, 12:12 PM
|
#6
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594
Original Poster
|
Well.. Here's the deal:
My ISP isn't the issue, and neither is LQ. The problem seems to have to do with a DNS server or network switch or something, located in New York. Where are LQ's servers anyways? I didn't think they were in/around N.Y. but..
Anyway, the ISP requested I do traceroute & ping to LQ, which I did. After 18 successful hops from me to Montreal, Ontario, Chicago, and New York, the trail goes dead -- in New York, as follows:
Code:
Hop
16 249ms 249ms 249ms 64.200.249.189
17 281ms 264ms 265ms nycmny2wcx3-pos14-0-oc192.wcg.net [64.200.240.25]
18 281ms 265ms 265ms nycmny2wcx1-pos1-0-oc48.wcg.net [64.200.68.161]
19 * * * Request timed out.
20 * * * Request timed out.
..//... trace complete.
.. and ping also fails from here.
Any ideas anyone? Is this an issue beyond my/our/your control?
Anyone in/around N.Y having troubles? Hmmmm...
MODS - If this would now be more appropriate in another forum, feel free...
Thanks.
|
|
|
05-24-2007, 03:23 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Distribution: Debian AMD64
Posts: 4,170
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrapefruiTgirl
Well.. Here's the deal:
My ISP isn't the issue, and neither is LQ. The problem seems to have to do with a DNS server or network switch or something, located in New York. Where are LQ's servers anyways? I didn't think they were in/around N.Y. but..
|
Buffalo, New York I believe, there have been times when I have had some slow downs/no connection to LQ but not often.
Quote:
Anyway, the ISP requested I do traceroute & ping to LQ, which I did. After 18 successful hops from me to Montreal, Ontario, Chicago, and New York, the trail goes dead -- in New York, as follows:
Code:
Hop
16 249ms 249ms 249ms 64.200.249.189
17 281ms 264ms 265ms nycmny2wcx3-pos14-0-oc192.wcg.net [64.200.240.25]
18 281ms 265ms 265ms nycmny2wcx1-pos1-0-oc48.wcg.net [64.200.68.161]
19 * * * Request timed out.
20 * * * Request timed out.
..//... trace complete.
.. and ping also fails from here.
Any ideas anyone? Is this an issue beyond my/our/your control?
Anyone in/around N.Y having troubles? Hmmmm...
MODS - If this would now be more appropriate in another forum, feel free...
Thanks.
|
Better than I usually get from my useless ISP I even had to change nameservers in my router because they have the most god awful ones I have ever used.
Code:
traceroute www.linuxquestions.org
traceroute to www.linuxquestions.org (64.179.4.146), 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 router (192.168.0.1) 1.135 ms 1.401 ms 1.023 ms
2 * * *
3 * * *
4 * * *
5 * *
|
|
|
05-24-2007, 05:22 PM
|
#8
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594
Original Poster
|
add more nameservers?
I'm trying to locate some more nameservers to add to my list, besides the two of my ISP. Can I do this?
And ultimately, will it help? Seems I need to use one somewhere off the normal beaten path from me to LQ.
Last edited by GrapefruiTgirl; 05-24-2007 at 05:24 PM.
|
|
|
05-24-2007, 05:50 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Distribution: Debian AMD64
Posts: 4,170
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrapefruiTgirl
I'm trying to locate some more nameservers to add to my list, besides the two of my ISP. Can I do this?
And ultimately, will it help? Seems I need to use one somewhere off the normal beaten path from me to LQ.
|
I use the www.opendns.org nameservers they are definitely much faster on my connection, though the nameservers will not help much with a broken/mis-configured router between you and LQ that is not what they do they just give you the IP not the route to it.
|
|
|
05-24-2007, 06:09 PM
|
#10
|
LQ Sage
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Saint Amant, Acadiana
Distribution: Gentoo ~amd64
Posts: 7,675
Rep:
|
I got sick and tired waiting for my ISP's nameserver to respond, too. I'm using a tiny program dnscache now, running in my router it sends out queries in its own and also caches them. Works like a dream.
|
|
|
05-24-2007, 07:11 PM
|
#11
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594
Original Poster
|
Thanks Happy-Tux ( Hello N.S. ) & Emerson -- I'll check into what both of you said.
I don't actually have a hardware router set up right now anyways, so nothing's misconfigured here at my end. It's somewhere in N.Y. where I cannot seem to get through. I just want to maybe add something as another backup to my nameservers file, so maybe my machine will take a route like a --> C --> B instead of the usual a --> b .
Update later --P.S. I did another traceroute, and got 3 hops further, to Buffalo, but still didn't quite make it to LQ!
|
|
|
05-24-2007, 07:27 PM
|
#12
|
Moderator
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
|
Weird. I have had no problems whether going directly to my ISP and then to LQ or going (via VPN) through Germany to LQ. I have moved this to LQ S&F as Jeremy may need to do some checks.
|
|
|
05-24-2007, 08:48 PM
|
#13
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,287
|
Periodically I have the same issue here in Aus. Never bothered with a traceroute.
Cancel and refresh usually fixes things - sometimes takes a couple of goes.
|
|
|
05-24-2007, 09:25 PM
|
#14
|
root
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,613
|
Adding name servers will not correct your issue, since the site is resolving fine for you. It looks like a (probably transient) issue in the cloud somewhere between your ISP and our uplink. If it persists, let me know.
--jeremy
|
|
|
05-24-2007, 09:41 PM
|
#15
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594
Original Poster
|
Thank you for that input Jeremy, though I wouldn't 'exactly' say it's resolving 'fine' -- the I.P. resolves, but I'm still using a proxy right now to actually reach the site with a browser, and traceroute is still failing. I do agree with your 'cloud' theory though, and will let you guys know one way or the other, if the problem persists or resolves itself (no pun intended) on its own.
Thanks again for this, and for a continuing job well done re: LQ
Sasha V.
EDIT:: I just tried again -- and for the first time in 2.5 days, I have actually got here without the proxy. The cloud/ether-fog has apparently lifted.
Woohoo!!
Last edited by GrapefruiTgirl; 05-24-2007 at 09:47 PM.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|